Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Strengths and Weaknesses of Primary School English Language Teaching Programs in Turkey: Issues Regarding Program Components

Pages
325–347
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All these issues seem to be persistent over all the ELTPs, thus they call for careful consideration and action for the improvement of further program changes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:162; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Century Schoolbook"; panose-1:2 4 6 4 5 5 5 2 3 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:4.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; line-height:15.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Century Schoolbook",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;} p.Ejal-Abstract-Text, li.Ejal-Abstract-Text, div.Ejal-Abstract-Text {mso-style-name:Ejal-Abstract-Text; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-next:Normal; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:4.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; line-height:12.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Century Schoolbook",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;} @page WordSection1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> Today, the ability to communicate in English is a need brought about by the globalization process encompassing developments in many fields such as science and technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To address this need, English language teaching programs in Turkey (henceforth ELTP) underwent substantial changes within the larger curriculum reform movements taking place in 1997, 2006 and 2013, the last of which is also called the 4+4+4 education system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All these issues seem to be persistent over all the ELTPs, thus they call for careful consideration and action for the improvement of further program changes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:English language teaching program · evaluation · language teaching

Abstract

<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:162; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Century Schoolbook"; panose-1:2 4 6 4 5 5 5 2 3 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:4.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; line-height:15.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Century Schoolbook",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;} p.Ejal-Abstract-Text, li.Ejal-Abstract-Text, div.Ejal-Abstract-Text {mso-style-name:Ejal-Abstract-Text; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-next:Normal; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:4.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; line-height:12.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Century Schoolbook",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;} @page WordSection1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> Today, the ability to communicate in English is a need brought about by the globalization process encompassing developments in many fields such as science and technology. To address this need, English language teaching programs in Turkey (henceforth ELTP) underwent substantial changes within the larger curriculum reform movements taking place in 1997, 2006 and 2013, the last of which is also called the 4+4+4 education system. In these ELTPs, major differences were based on primary school English language teaching and learning. However, there is a growing claim that these ELTPs did not achieve the intensions in equipping primary school students with the necessary communicative skills in English. Thus, this integrative literature review study aims to explore the results of the evaluation studies so as to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each ELTP regarding such program components as aims and outcomes, content, materials, and testing and assessment. In line with this, studies conducted to evaluate the 1997, 2006 and 2013 ELTPs were examined thoroughly, and their findings were identified for the analysis. The analysis of the studies showed that problems with the ELTPs under evaluation included not carefully written aims and outcomes failing to include all domains. It also reveals problems with the selection and design of the content and materials which failed to be adequate and effective. Lastly, reliance on paper-based assessment even failing to include productive skills is seen to be another problem. All these issues seem to be persistent over all the ELTPs, thus they call for careful consideration and action for the improvement of further program changes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERARSLAN, A. (2018). Strengths and Weaknesses of Primary School English Language Teaching Programs in Turkey: Issues Regarding Program Components. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 325–347. https://ajindex.com/articles/284855

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alkan, M. F., & Arslan, M. (2014). Evaluation of the 2nd Grade English Language Curriculum, Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Dergisi, 4 (7), 87-100.
  2. Alparslan, A. M. (2014). The Antecedent of Job Satisfaction from the University and Extra-Role Behavior: A Survey on Mehmet Akif Ersoy University. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6 (11), 82-101.
  3. Arı, A. (2014). Teacher Opinions about Evaluation of 6th Grade English Lesson Curriculum in Primary Schools. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 7 (2), 172-194.
  4. Arıbaş, S., & Tok, H. (2004). Evaluating the Problems Encountered in Foreign Language Instruction in the First Level of Elementary School. In XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı (pp. 6–9).
  5. Malatya. Aslan, Y. (2016). Comparison of Primary School Foreign Language Curricula of Turkey, Germany and the Netherlands. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(8), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i8.1581
  6. Aybek, B. (2015). An Evaluation of Primary Education Second Grade English Course Based Upon the Views of English Teachers. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume, 10 (15), 67–84.
  7. Bayraktar, B. (2014). Evaluation of the English Curriculum for Second Classes in Primary Schools according to Teachers’ Opinions. Uludağ Üniversitesi,
  8. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa. Bozavlı, E. (2015). Evaluation of Foreign Language Teaching in 2nd Year of Primary School according to Teachers’ Opinions. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (2), 74-83.
  9. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27-40.
  10. Brown, J. (1995). The elements of language curriculum A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  11. Bulut, İ., & Atabey, E. (2016). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the primary school 2nd grade English language curriculum in practice. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(3), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.17679/INUEFD.17366404
  12. Büge, B. C. (2005). An Examination of the Comparison of Turkey’s Primary School English Curriculum and Finland’s Foreign Language Curriculum (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Hacettepe University, Social Sciences Institution, Ankara.
  13. Büyükduman, F. İ. (2005). The Opinions’ of Elementary Schools English Teachers on the English Curriculum for Elementary Schools. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 55-64. Cihan,T. & Gürlen, E. (2