Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Promoting the correct production of English sounds in extensive reading-circle classes: Explicit vs. implicit pronunciation training

Pages
101–118
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study revealed that explicit pronunciation training is more advantageous for B1 level students than the implicit one due to various reasons.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Correct pronunciation of English words is of vital significance for mutual intelligibility in the EFL context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite its prominence in L2 learning, teachers of English cannot decide whether and how to implement pronunciation practice into their teaching practices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study revealed that explicit pronunciation training is more advantageous for B1 level students than the implicit one due to various reasons.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:explicit vs. implicit instruction · extensive reading · segmental pronunciation

Abstract

Correct pronunciation of English words is of vital significance for mutual intelligibility in the EFL context. Despite its prominence in L2 learning, teachers of English cannot decide whether and how to implement pronunciation practice into their teaching practices. For this reason, pronunciation training is widely neglected in language classes or learners of English might learn incorrect pronunciation of segmental units causing fossilization in L2 setting. The importance of pronunciation training has been highlighted in the related literature. Keeping this fact in mind, this study aims to explore whether explicit pronunciation instruction has a superiority over implicit instruction in extensive reading classes. To reach this purpose, two groups of successive B1-level Intensive English Program (IEP) students were chosen through convenience sampling technique. Before training, both groups were given a pre-test of segmental unit pronunciation consisting of the most frequented words in the book used for the extensive reading classes at B1 level. Then the participants in the control group received implicit pronunciation training in which the language instructor did not directly focus on phonemic properties of English sounds. However, explicit pronunciation training was implemented into the teaching practices in the experimental group. The teaching period lasted eight weeks, and following this period both groups were given a post-test to unravel the level of improvement in each group. The results of this study revealed that explicit pronunciation training is more advantageous for B1 level students than the implicit one due to various reasons.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAKUT, İ. (2020). Promoting the correct production of English sounds in extensive reading-circle classes: Explicit vs. implicit pronunciation training. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 101–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/284817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
  2. Bardakci, M. (2015). Turkish EFL pre-service teachers’ pronunciation problems. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(16), 2370-2378. doi:10.5897/ERR2015.2396 Brinton, D. M. (2017). Pronunciation. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 3, pp. 257-270).
  3. New York, NY: Routledge. Çakır, İ. (2012). Promoting correct pronunciation through supported audio materials for EFL learners. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1801-1812.
  4. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Chan, R., & Leung, J. (2014). Implicit learning of L2 word stress regularities. Second Language Research, 30(4), 463-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313510169
  6. Couper, G. (2011). What makes pronunciation teaching work? Testing for the effect of two variables: socially constructed metalanguage and critical listening. Language Awareness, 20(3), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.570347
  7. Darcy, I. (2018). Powerful and effective pronunciation instruction: How can we achieve it? The CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 13– 45. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1174218.pdf
  8. Demirezen, M. (2003). Turkish learners’ pronunciation problems caused by the English phoneme of THETA. Tömer Language Journal, 120, 57-71.
  9. Demirezen, M. (2005). The /o/ and /ow/ contrast: Curing a fossilized pronunciation error of Turkish teacher trainees of the English language. Çankaya University Journal of Arts and Sciences, 1(3), 71-84.
  10. Demirezen, M. (2010). The principles and applications of the audio-lingual pronunciation rehabilitation model in foreign language teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 6(2), 127-147. Retrieved from https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/99
  11. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486
  12. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A Longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479-502.