SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

‘Please’ as an impoliteness marker in English discourse

Laya Heidari DARANİ
Mostafa Morady MOGHADDAM
Pages
243–263
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it was concluded that certain functions of the impolite please were shared between the Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers, while some functions were not shared between these two groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explored how Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers conceptualized the impolite use of please in interaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, informal conversations of 20 Iranian EFL learners in pairs and small groups were recorded and transcribed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it was concluded that certain functions of the impolite please were shared between the Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers, while some functions were not shared between these two groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:impoliteness · Iranian EFL learners · native English speakers

Abstract

This study explored how Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers conceptualized the impolite use of please in interaction. Moreover, attempts were made to examine whether Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers differ in using the impolite version of please in their communications. To this end, informal conversations of 20 Iranian EFL learners in pairs and small groups were recorded and transcribed. The impolite version of please in these conversations was compared with similar data from the Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language (COLT). According to results, several functions of the ‘impolite’ please were found among Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers. Firstly, please was used to establish or confirm harmonious relationships between the speakers; it was used as rapport-strengthening impoliteness marker. Secondly, ‘mock impoliteness’ was conceptualized to bear positive meaning since it was interpreted as an amusing or entertaining remark. In teenagers’ circles, entertainment skills whereby impolite please was employed were highly valued. Thirdly, participants adhered to ‘repetition’, ‘reformulation’, and ‘escalation’ in their interactions to show their creative impoliteness. Finally, it was concluded that certain functions of the impolite please were shared between the Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers, while some functions were not shared between these two groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

DARANİ, L. H., MOGHADDAM, M. M. (2020). ‘Please’ as an impoliteness marker in English discourse. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 243–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/284808

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aijmer, K. (2009). Please: A politeness formula viewed in a translation perspective. Brno Studies in English, 35(2), 63-77.
  2. Aijmer, K. (2015). Will you fuck off please? The use of please by London teenagers. Soprag, 3(2), 127-149.
  3. Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452-471.
  4. Arundale, R. B. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2(2), 193-216.
  5. Barron, A. (2000). Acquiring ‘different strokes’: A longitudinal study of the development of L2 pragmatic competence. German as a Foreign Language Journal (GFL Journal), 2, 1-29.
  6. Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bernal, M. (2008). Do insults always insult? Genuine politeness versus non-genuine politeness in colloquial Spanish. Pragmatics, 18(4), 775–802.
  7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood: Ablex Publishing. Blum-Kulka, S., & Levenston, E. A. (1987). Lexical-grammatical pragmatic indicators. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(2), 155-170.
  8. Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. A. (Eds.). (2008). Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56-310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Brownell, H., & Stringfellow, A. (1999). Making requests: illustrations of how right-hemisphere brain damage can affect discourse production. Brain and Language, 68, 442- 465. Chilton, P. (1990). Politeness, politics, and diplomacy. Discourse and Society, 1(2), 201-224.
  11. Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The weakest link. Jo