Journals / Medeniyet Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

Our management of anesthesia in elective and emergency cesarean surgery: A retrospective evaluation of the last ten years

Elektif ve acil sezaryen ameliyatlarında anestezi yönetimimiz: Son on yılın retrospektif değerlendirilmesi

Pages
245–249
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think that combined spinal-epidural anesthesia should be applied more frequently in elective cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The choice of anesthesia used in cesarean operations is determi- ned by the patient’s clinical status, the experience of the anest- hetist, the urgency of surgery and the patient’s wishes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study evaluated anesthetic practices in cesarean surgery performed in the preceding 10 years in our Maternity Hospital, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think that combined spinal-epidural anesthesia should be applied more frequently in elective cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The choice of anesthesia used in cesarean operations is determi- ned by the patient’s clinical status, the experience of the anest- hetist, the urgency of surgery and the patient’s wishes. This study evaluated anesthetic practices in cesarean surgery performed in the preceding 10 years in our Maternity Hospital, Turkey. Hos- pital computer system records and file archives between 2006 and 2015 were screened. Anesthesia techniques used in elective and emergency cesarean surgery were recorded. The distributi- on of these techniques by years was then analyzed. A total of 28.986 cesarean sections (cases) were performed in our hospital in 2006-2015. Eighty-four percent of them were emergency and 16% of them were elective CSs. General anesthesia was used in 4848 (17%) and regional anesthesia in 24.138 (83%) patients, while combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was used in 2% and epidural anesthesia in 1% of the patients. Regional anesthesia was used frequently in our clinic similar to European countries. Spinal anesthesia was the most commonly preferred method of regional anesthesia in our clinic. However, especially in emer- gency cases combined spinal-epidural or epidural anesthesia was not applied. We think that combined spinal-epidural anesthesia should be applied more frequently in elective cases.

Özet

Sezaryen ameliyatlarında kullanılan anestezi uygulaması seçi- mi; hastanın kliniği, anestezistin tecrübesi, cerrahinin aciliyeti ve hastanın isteğine göre belirlenir. Bu çalışmada, kadın doğum hastanemizde son 10 yılda yapılan sezaryen operasyonlarındaki anestezi uygulamaları değerlendirilmiştir. 2006-2015 yılları ara- sında hastanemiz bilgisayar sistem kayıtları ve dosya arşivleri tarandı. Elektif ve acil olarak yapılan sezaryen ameliyatlarında kullanılan anestezi yöntemleri kaydedildi. Bu yöntemlerin yılla- ra göre dağılımı analiz edildi. Hastanemizde 2006-2015 yılları arasında toplam 28986 sezaryen ameliyatı gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sezaryenlerin %84’ü acil, %16’sı elektifti. Dört bin sekiz yüz kırk sekiz (%17) hastada genel anestezi, 24138 (%83) hastada böl- gesel anestezi tercih edilmiş olup, hastaların %2’sinde kombine spinal-epidural, %1’inde ise epidural anestezi tercih edilmiştir. Kliniğimizde bölgesel anestezi yöntemlerinin kullanımı Avru- pa ülkelerine benzer şekilde yüksek bulunmuştur. Kliniğimizde bölgesel anestezi yontemi olarak en Çok spinal anestezi tercih edilirken, özellikle acil vakalarda hiç kombine spinal-epidural ve epidural anestezi uygulanmadığı görülmektedir. Elektif va- kalarda ise kombine spinal-epidural uygulamasının artırılması gerektiği düşüncesindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMEN, Ö., ARSLAN, Z., EKİNCİ, M., TÖR, İ., KARA, D., KARAKAYA, M. A. (2016). Our management of anesthesia in elective and emergency cesarean surgery: A retrospective evaluation of the last ten years. Medeniyet Medical Journal, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 245–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/283418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Göktuğ A, Özayar E, Oba Ş, ve ark. Sezaryen Olgularında Uygulanan Rejyonel Anestezi Tekniklerinin Yan Etkilerinin Sonuçları. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2007;35:145-51
  2. Dahl V, Spreng UJ. Anaesthesia for urgent (grade 1) caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;22:352-6.
  3. McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ, Clavisi OM et al. Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: an observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008;17:292-7.
  4. Kocamanoğlu IS, Sarıhasan B, Sener B et al. Methods and complications of Anesthesia in cesarean/section operations: Retrospective evaluations of 3552 cases. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2005;25:810-16
  5. McCool WF, Packman J, Zwerling A. Obstetric anesthesia: changes and choices. J Midwifery Women’s Health 2004;49:505-13.
  6. Gürsoy C, Ok G, Aydın D, et al. Effect of Anaesthesia Methods for Regaining Dailly life Activities in Cesarean Patients. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2014;42:71-9.
  7. Gogarten W. Spinal anaesthesia for obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003;17(3):377-92.
  8. Lynch J, Scholz S. Anaesthetic-related complications of caesarean section. Zentralbl Gynakol 2005;127(2):91-5.
  9. Marcus HE, Behrend A, Schier R, et al. Anesthesiological management of Caesarean sections: nationwide survey in Germany. Anaesthesist 2011;60:916-28.
  10. Gulhaş N, Şanlı M, Ozgul U, ve ark. Sezaryenlerde Anestezi Yonetimi: Retrospektif Değerlendirme. İnonu Universitesi Tıp Fakultesi Dergisi 2012;19:142-5.
  11. Levy DA. Anaesthesia for Cesarean section. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2001;1:171-6.
  12. Diemunsch P, Pottecher J, Chassard D. Anesthetic management in case of previous cesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2012;41(8):817-21.
  13. Toker K, Yılmaz AS, Gürkan Y, et al. Anesthesia for Caesarean surgery, 5-year retrospective evaluation. TARCM 2003;31:26- 30
  14. Aksoy M, Aksoy AN, Dostbil A, et al. Anaesthesia Techniques For Caesarean Operations: Retrospective Analysis Of Last Decade. T