Journals / Medeniyet Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Value of hip B-mode gray scale histogram in the diagnosis of Graf Type IIa physiologically immature hip

Graf Tip IIa fizyolojik inmatür kalça tanısında B-mod gri skala histogramın değeri

Pages
175–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think that there is a significant positive correlation between alpha angle and femoral head echogenicity which is a sign of physiological immaturity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objectives of this study are to measure femur head echoge- nicity in newborns with physiologic immature hips (type 2a), to compare it with cases with mature type 1a hips and to reveal the value of femur head echogenicity in the evaluation of physi- ologically immature hips.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study consisted of 65 type 1a and 65 type 2a physiologically immature hip joints detected in the radiology clinic, and categorized according to the Graf classifi- cation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think that there is a significant positive correlation between alpha angle and femoral head echogenicity which is a sign of physiological immaturity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to measure femur head echoge- nicity in newborns with physiologic immature hips (type 2a), to compare it with cases with mature type 1a hips and to reveal the value of femur head echogenicity in the evaluation of physi- ologically immature hips. This study consisted of 65 type 1a and 65 type 2a physiologically immature hip joints detected in the radiology clinic, and categorized according to the Graf classifi- cation. Only 8-week-old newborns were included in the study in order to avoid differences that might arise from patients’ age. Femoral head echogenicity was measured by software availab- le on the ultrasonic device and hip joint ultrasound according to each newborn Graf method. Femur head echogenicity histogram values were 69.44±2.87 in type 1a group, and 57.55±2.92 in type 2a group and there was a significant difference between both groups (p <0,05). The echogenicity values of the subgroups of Type 2a (2a (+) and 2a (-)) were 59.30±1.70 and 54.34±1.69, res- pectively, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0,05). A positive correlation was found between the hip joint alpha angle and femoral head echogenicity histogram values (r=0.953, p<0.001). Type 2a physiologically immature neo- nates have significantly lower femoral head echogenicity measu- red with the B mode histogram method compared with the type 1a maturation group. We think that there is a significant positive correlation between alpha angle and femoral head echogenicity which is a sign of physiological immaturity.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Graf sınıflandırmasına göre fizyolojik inma- tür (tip 2a) yenidoğanlarda femur başı ekojenitesini ölçmek ve matür tip 1a olan olgular ile karşılaştırmak, fizyolojik immatür kalçalar tanısında femur başı ekojenitesinin değerini ortaya koy- maktır. Bu çalışma, radyoloji kliniğinde graf sınıflamasına göre 65 tip 1a matür ve 65 tip 2a fizyolojik immatür kalçası olan yeni- doğandan oluşmaktaydı. Yaşdan kaynaklanabilecek farklılıkların önüne geçebilmek için yalnızca 8 haftalık yenidoğanlar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Her yenidoğana Graf yöntemine göre kalça eklemi ultrasonografisi ve ultrason cihazında var olan yazılım ile femur başı ekojenitesi ölçüldü. Tip 1a grubunda femur başı ekojenitesi histogram değeri 69,44±2,87 iken, Tip 2a grubunda 57,55±2,92 bulunmuş olup her iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmış- tır (p<0,05). Tip 2a’nın alt grupları olan 2a (+) ve 2a (-) ekojenite değerleri sırası ile 59,30±1,70 ve 54,34±1,69 bulunmuş olup her iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmıştır (p<0,05). Kalça eklemi alfa açıları ile femur başı ekojenite histogram değerleri arasında pozitif korelasyon saptandı (r=0,953, p<0,001). Tip 2 a fizyolojik immatür yenidoğanlarda, tip 1a matür grup ile karşı- laştırıldığında femur başı ekojenitesi B mod histogram yöntemi ile anlamlı olarak düşüktür. Alfa açıları ile femur başı ekojenitesi arasında anlamlı pozitif korelasyon mevcut olup, fizyolojik imma- türitenin bir göstergesi olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEKİÇ, B., ERDEM-TOSLAK, İ., YÜKSEL, Y., SAĞLIK, S., GÖKMEN, A., KÖSE, Ö. (2017). Value of hip B-mode gray scale histogram in the diagnosis of Graf Type IIa physiologically immature hip. Medeniyet Medical Journal, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 175–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/283387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Köse N, Ömeroğlu H, Dağlar B. Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi Ulusal Erken Tanı ve Tedavi Programı 2010; 4-5 http://www. bsm.gov.tr/duyuru Erişim tarihi: 09/02/2013.
  2. Shipman SA, Helfand M, Moyer VA, Yawn BP. Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A systematic literature review for the US preventive services task force. Pediatrics 2006;117:557-76. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1597 Graf R. Hip ultrasonography. Basic principles and current as- pects. Orthopade 1997;26:14-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001320050065
  3. Karapınar L, Surenkök F, Oztürk H, et al. The importance of predicted risk factors in developmental hip dysplasia:an ult- rasonographic screening program. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2002;36:106-110.
  4. Loder RT, Skopelja EN. The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia. Orthop 2011:238607. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/238607. eCollection 2011.
  5. Çekiç B, Erdem Toslak I, Sertkaya Ö, et al. Incidence and fol- low up outcomes of developmental hip dysplasia of new- borns in the Western Mediterranean Region. Turk J Pediatr 2015;57:353-58.
  6. Kolb A, Schweiger N, Pokorny MM, et al. Low incidence of early developmental dysplasia of the hip in universal ultraso- nographic screening of newborns: analysis and evaluation of risk factors. International Orthopaedics (SICOT), https://doi. org/10.1007/s00264-015-2799-2, 2015.
  7. Ortiz-Neira CL, Paolucci EO, Donnon T. A meta-analysis of common risk factors associated with the diagnosis of de- velopmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:344-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.003
  8. Roposch A, Wright JG. Increased diagnostic information and understanding disease: uncertainty in the diagnosis of deve- lopmental hip dysplasia. Radiology 2007;242:355-9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051937 Graf R. The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Compound treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1980;97:117-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00450934
  9. Omeroglu H, Caylak R, Inan U. Ultrasonographic Graf, type IIa hip needs more consideration in newborn girls. J Child Ort- hop 2013;7:95-98 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0476-1
  10. Koşar P, Ergun E, Gökharman F, et al. Follow-up sonographic results for Graf type 2a hips association with risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip and instability. J Ultraso- und Med 2011;30:677-683. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.5.677
  11. Sewell MD, Eastwood. Screening and treatment in develop- mental dysplasia of the hip-where do we