Journals / MALİYE FİNANS YAZILARI / 2018 / Sayı: 110

Structural Changes in Chinese Industrial Sector: Lessons for Emerging Economies

Çin Sanayi Sektörünün Yapısal Değişimi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler İçin Dersler1

Pages
161–174
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analyzing the structural changes in Chinese industrial sector would provide useful lessons for countries that experience early de-industrialization such as India, and countries that are in the middle income trap, such as Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After changing its closed economy structure in favor of an outward oriented economic growth model in 1978, China has demonstrated an outstanding growth performance during the past 40 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When China first opened up its economy to international markets, thanks to abundant and cheap labor force it had, the country attracted vast amounts of foreign direct investment and enjoyed high growth rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analyzing the structural changes in Chinese industrial sector would provide useful lessons for countries that experience early de-industrialization such as India, and countries that are in the middle income trap, such as Turkey.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After changing its closed economy structure in favor of an outward oriented economic growth model in 1978, China has demonstrated an outstanding growth performance during the past 40 years. When China first opened up its economy to international markets, thanks to abundant and cheap labor force it had, the country attracted vast amounts of foreign direct investment and enjoyed high growth rates. As China strategically directed the ensuing income into new capital formation and research and development activities, it transformed its industrial sector into a high technology manufacturer. Increased competitive power of Chinese manufacturers in international markets in return enabled China to maintain high growth rates. Analyzing the structural changes in Chinese industrial sector would provide useful lessons for countries that experience early de-industrialization such as India, and countries that are in the middle income trap, such as Turkey.

Özet

Çin, 1978 yılından itibaren ekonomi stratejisini kendi kendine ye-ten bir ekonomi olmaktan, dışa açık bir büyüme modeli lehine değiştirmiş ve son 40 yıllık süreçte etkileyici bir büyüme performansı sergilemiştir. İlk aşamada sahip olduğu bol ve ucuz işgücü sayesinde ülkeye çekmeyi başardığı doğrudan yabancı yatırımların etkili olduğu yüksek büyüme oranlarını Çin, sermaye birikimine ve teknolojik gelişmelere yaptığı yatı-rımlarla sürdürülebilir hale getirmiştir. Bu gelişmeler sayesinde 1990’lar-daki düşük teknolojili ve çoğu zaman düşük kaliteli ürün ihracatçısı konu-mundan çıkan Çin, ileri teknoloji ürünleri imalatında dünyanın gelişmiş ülkeleriyle yarışır hale gelmiştir. Bu makalede Çin’in bu süreç içerisinde sanayi sektöründe gerçekleştirdiği yapısal değişim incelenmiştir. Bu ça-lışmanın Hindistan gibi ekonomisi henüz yeterince gelişmeden erken sa-nayisizleşme sürecine giren ülkeler ve Türkiye gibi orta gelir tuzağındaki ülkeler için önemli çıkarımlar sağlayacağı değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAĞMUR, M. H., KARAKAYA, G. (2018). Structural Changes in Chinese Industrial Sector: Lessons for Emerging Economies. MALİYE FİNANS YAZILARI, Sayı: 110, 161–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/281512

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aynagöz Ç. Ö. (2008). Çin’in Dünya Ekonomisi İle Bütünleşme Süreci ve Türk Sanayisi Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 13(1), 253-268.
  2. Cai, F., Park, A., & Zhao, Y. (2008). The Chinese Labor Market in the Reform Era. In L. Brandt & T. Rawski (Eds.), China’s Great Economic Transformation (sayfa, 167-214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Dasgupta, S. & Singh, A. (2006). Manufacturing, services and premature deindustria-lization in developing countries: A Kaldorian analysis. NU‐WIDER, United Nations University Research Paper, No. 2006/49. Dünya Bankası (2018) World Development Indicators veri seti. http://databank.worl-dbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
  4. Göçer, İ. (2013). Ar-Ge Harcamalarının Yüksek Teknolojili Ürün İhracatı, Dış Ticaret Dengesi ve Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileri. Maliye Dergisi, 165, 215-240.
  5. Güloğlu, B. & Tekin R. B. (2012). A Panel Causality Analysis of the Relationship among Research and Development, Innovation, and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 2(1), 32-47.
  6. Hanson, G. H. & Robertson, R. (2008). China and the manufacturing exports of other developing Countries. NBER Working Paper Series, 14497. IFR (2017a). International Federation of Robotics. World Robotics, 2017 edition. IFR (2017b). International Federation of Robotics. Robots: China breaks historic records in automation. IFR press releases, 16 Ağustos 2017.
  7. IFR (2018). International Federation of Robotics. Robot density rises globally. IFR press releases, 7 Şubat 2018.
  8. Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom: An Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  9. Liu, X., Buck, T. & Shu, C. (2005). Chinese Economic Development, the Next Stage: Outward FDI? International Business Review, 14(1), 97-115.
  10. Lopez C. E., Micco, A. & Molina D. (2005) How Sensitive Are Latin American Exports to Chinese Competition in the U.S Markets? Dünya Bankası, Policy Research Working Paper, 4497. Morrison, W. M. (2018). China’s Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States. Congressional Report Service. Qian, Y. (2000). The process of China’s market transition (1978-1998): The evolutio-nary, historical, and comparative perspectives. Journal of Institutional and Theoreti-cal Economics, 156(1), 151-171.
  11. Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21