Journals / Manas Journal of Engineering / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Some quality qualifications of cooked meat sous vide in the storage process

Pages
34–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that sous vide method can provide advantages especially in terms of long shelf life and close to consumer preference.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the physicochemical and microbiological quality characteristics of some meat samples (Longissimus dorsi, LD; Longissimus lumborum, LL; Longissimus thoracis, LT) that were cooked in sous vide method at different time combinations (2 and 4 hours) at 70°C during the storage process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Meats used as materials in the study were obtained from 22-24 months old Simental cattle.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that sous vide method can provide advantages especially in terms of long shelf life and close to consumer preference.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Meat quality · Cooking methods · Microbiological quality

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the physicochemical and microbiological quality characteristics of some meat samples (Longissimus dorsi, LD; Longissimus lumborum, LL; Longissimus thoracis, LT) that were cooked in sous vide method at different time combinations (2 and 4 hours) at 70°C during the storage process. Meats used as materials in the study were obtained from 22-24 months old Simental cattle. All experimental meat samples were cut in 2x15 cm size and salted. Salted meat samples were vacuum-packed and cooked by sous vide method. Cooked meat samples were stored at 2 ± 2°C for 7 days. Physicochemical and microbiological analyzes were performed on the 0., 3., 7th days of storage. It was observed that the pH values of the samples remained within acceptable limits during storage and the pH values increased as the cooking time increased. it was observed that cooking loss rates increased in parallel with increasing cooking time, and this increase was more clear in LL samples In addition, it was determined that as the cooking time of LT and LD samples gets longer the cooking loss increased and it affected the values of a * (redness) and L * (brightness). it was observed that no living microorganism produced in any samples taken into analysis during storage. As a result; not finding microorganisms in the samples with sous vide technique for 7 days in the storage period, it is believed to strengthen the reliability of safe food production. It is concluded that sous vide method can provide advantages especially in terms of long shelf life and close to consumer preference.

🔖

Cite This Article

BABÜR, T. E., TEKİNŞEN, K. K., GÜRBÜZ, Ü. (2019). Some quality qualifications of cooked meat sous vide in the storage process. Manas Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 34–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/281467

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Hecer C. Et teknolojisinde ambalajlama yöntemleri. Uludağ Unv. J. Fac. Vet. Med. 1, (2012), 57-61.
  2. Balpetek D., Gürbüz Ü. Use of ohmic heating system in meat thawing and ıts effects on microbiological quality. MANAS Journal of Engineering, 6, 2 (2018), 129 – 142. Meyer R.A. Sous vide technology: American foodservice markets discovering the benefits. Journal of Reataurant and Foodservice Marketing, 2, (2008), 51-62. Yılmaz H. Sous vide üretim tekniği kullanılarak hazırlanan macar gulaş yemeğinde mikrobiyolojik kalitenin değerlendirilmesi. Master Thesis, Gazi Ünv. Ankara, Türkiye, (2014).
  3. Haskaraca G., Kolsarıcı N. Sous vide teknolojisi ve et teknolojisinde uygulama olanakları. Akademik Gıda Dergisi, 11, 2, (2013), 94-101.
  4. Peiretti G.P., Medana C., Visentin S., Dal Bello F., Meineri G., Effect cooking on carnosine and homologues, pentosidine and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance content in beef and turkey meat. Food Chem, 132, (2012), 80-85.
  5. Mol Ş., Özturan S. Sous vide teknolojisi ve su ürünlerindeki uygulamalar. Journal of Fisheries Sci, 3(1), (2009), 68-75.
  6. Lambooji E., Potgieter C.M., Britz C.M., Nortje G.L., Pieterse C. Effect of electrical and mechanical stunning methods on meat quality in ostriches. Meat Sci, 52(3), (1999), 331-337.
  7. Li X., Babol J., Wallby A., Lundström K. Meat quality, microbiological status and consumer preference of beef gluteus melius aged in a dry ageing bag or vacuum. Meat Sci, 95, (2013), 229-234.
  8. Röhrle F.T., Moloney A.P., Osorio M.T., Laciano G., Priolo A., Caplan P., Monahan F.J. Carotenoid colour and reflectance measurements in bovine adipose tissue to discriminate between beef from different feding system. Meat Sci, 88, (2011), 347-353.
  9. Huidobro F.B., Micguel E., Blasquez B., Onega E. Acomparision between two methods (Warner Bratzler-texture profile analysis) for testing either raw or cooked meat. Meat Sci, 69, (2005) 527-536. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) BAM, Bacteriological analytical manual, Aerobic plate count, Chapter 3, January (2001) edition. Özdamar K. Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi I. Anadolu Ünv. Eskişehir. (1997).
  10. Diaz P., Nieto G., Garrido M.D., Banon S. Microbial, physical-chemical and sensoryspoilage during the refrigerated storage of cooked pork loin processed by the sous vide method. Meat Sci, 80(2), (2008) 287-292. Harun F. Tavuk köftelerinin sous vide yöntemi ile muhafazası. Cumhuriyet Ünv. Fen Bilimleri Ens. Master Thesis. Sivas, Turkey (2012). Feiner G. Meat products handbook