With proper compaction, load-deformation characteristics were found to be almost identical in different layers of the fill and very close to that of the natural soil.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to examine load-deformation characteristics at different fill layers of a high fill and to determine typical modeling parameters by using plate loading tests in a real construction site.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The average value of the modulus of elasticity $E_{plaxis}$ was found to be 53 MN/$m^2$ and Poisson’s ratio was found to be 0.2 for the dense sand soil of the construction site.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With proper compaction, load-deformation characteristics were found to be almost identical in different layers of the fill and very close to that of the natural soil.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine load-deformation characteristics at different fill layers of a high fill and to determine typical modeling parameters by using plate loading tests in a real construction site. The average value of the modulus of elasticity $E_{plaxis}$ was found to be 53 MN/$m^2$ and Poisson’s ratio was found to be 0.2 for the dense sand soil of the construction site. With proper compaction, load-deformation characteristics were found to be almost identical in different layers of the fill and very close to that of the natural soil.
🔖
Cite This Article
KAVAK, A., OKAY, F., DOĞAN, S., MUTMAN, U. (2011). Earth fill modelling with finite element method. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 565–575. https://ajindex.com/articles/279926
Sridharan A, Nagaraj HB, Plastic limit and compaction characteristics of finegrained soils, Thomas Telford Ltd., 9, No.1:17-22, 2005 2. Johnson AW, Sallberg JR, Factors influencing compaction results, Highway Research Board Bulletin No. 319, 125, 1962 3. Yetimoğlu, T, Bearing capacity of footings on vibratory compacted sand, Technical journal, 9: 1587-1600, 1998 4. Defossez, P, Richard G, Models of Soil Compaction Due to Traffic and Their Evaluation, Soil & Tillage Research 67: 41–64, 2007 5. Schweiger HF, Peschl, GM, Reliability analysis in geotechnics with the random set finite element method, Computers and Geotechnics 32: 422–435, 2005 6. Moayed, RZ, Janbaz M, Foundation Size Effect on Modulus of Subgrade Reaction in Clayey Soil, Electronic Journal of geotechnical Engineering 13: 1-8, 2008 7. DIN 18134 “Determination the deformation and strength characteristics of soil by the plate loading test”, September 2001 8. Doğan S, Modelling earth fills using finite element method, Master dissertation Kocaeli University Civil engineering 2009 9. Bowles JE, Engineering properties of soils and their measurements $4^ {th}$edition McGraw-Hill, 1992 10. Laman M, Keskin MS, Kumlu zeminlere oturan kare temeller altında düsey gerilme analizi, Vertical Stress Analysis of Square Foundations on Sandy Soils, Turkish Engineering News 431:53-57, 2004 11. US Army Corps of Engineers,Engineering Manual No. 1110-1-1905, October: 3-3, 1992