SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2000 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6

Comparing the leak point pressure and maximal urethral closing pressure in diagnosis of type III urethra

Tip III üretra tanısında "Leak point pressure" ve maksimal üretral basıncın karşılaştırılması

Özhan TURAN
Serdar KOÇ
LEVENT YAŞAR
Ateş KARATEKE
Ziya ÇEBİ
kadir SAVAN
Pages
807–811
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: LPP has more sensitive and spesific than MUCP for detrmination of type III urethra.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Determination of effectivty of Leak Point Preasure (LPP) and Maximal Urethral Closure Presure (MUCP) in type III urethra diagnosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL AND METHOD: Two hundred twenty patients who have urinary incontinance applied to Süleymaniye Maternity Hospital on March 12, 1997 to March 27, 1998 are examined by urodinamic studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: LPP has more sensitive and spesific than MUCP for detrmination of type III urethra.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tanı teknikleri · ürolojik · Üretra hastalıkları

Abstract

AIM: Determination of effectivty of Leak Point Preasure (LPP) and Maximal Urethral Closure Presure (MUCP) in type III urethra diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Two hundred twenty patients who have urinary incontinance applied to Süleymaniye Maternity Hospital on March 12, 1997 to March 27, 1998 are examined by urodinamic studies. LPP and MUCP values were measured. Cystourethroscopic examination was performed all the patients except who have detrusor instability and mixt incontinance. RESULTS: Cystourethroscopic examination was performed to 97 patients and 16 have type III urethra. Cystourethroscopic examination accept as gold standart. According to gold standart LPP's sensitivity, specifity , positive predictive value and negative predictive value found 87,5%, 100%, 100% and 97.5%. MUCP's values were 56.25%, 100%, 100% and 92%. CONCLUSION: LPP has more sensitive and spesific than MUCP for detrmination of type III urethra.

Özet

AMAÇ: Tip III üretrayı tanımada Leak point presure' (LPP) ve Maksimal uretral kapanış basıncı (MUCP) nın etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Süleymaniye Doğumevi ve Kadın Hastalıkları Hastanesinde 12/3/97 ile 27/3/98 tarihleri arasında ürojinekoloji polikliniğine başvuran 220 olguda ürodinamik inceleme yapıldı. LPP ve MUCP ölçümü yapıldı. Detrusor instabilitesi ve miks inkontinans saptanan olgular dışındaki tüm olgulara sistoüretroskopi yapıldı. BULGULAR: Toplam 220 olgunun 97'sine sistoüretroskopi yapıldı ve 16 olguda tip III üretra tesbit edildi. Gold standart olarak sistoüretroskopiyi kabul ettiğimizde LPP'nin sensivitesi %87.5, spesivitesi % 100 pozitif prediktivitesi %100 negatif prediktivitesi %97.5 idi. MUCP'nin ise tip III üretrayı tesbit etmedeki sensitivitesi %56.25 spesivitesi %100 pozitif prediktivitesi %100 negatif prediktivitesi %92 olarak bulundu. SONUÇ: Tip III üretra tanısında LPP'nin MUCP'dan daha kullanışlı olduğunu ve yüksek sensivite ve spesivitesi nedeniyle güvenle kullanılabileceğini düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, Ö., KOÇ, S., YAŞAR, L., KARATEKE, A., ÇEBİ, Z., SAVAN, K. (2000). Comparing the leak point pressure and maximal urethral closing pressure in diagnosis of type III urethra. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 6, 807–811. https://ajindex.com/articles/279661

References (8)

  1. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick ML, Won J et al. Clinical assesment of uretral sphincter function. J Urol 1993; 150:1452-4
  2. Swift SE: A compansion of stress leak point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in patients with genuine stress incontinence, Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85:704-8
  3. Blavis JG, Olsson CA. Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach. J. Urol 1988:39:727-31
  4. Corman J, Sultana MD. Uretral closure pressure and leak point pressure in incontinent women Obstet.Gynecol. 1995; 86(5): 839-42
  5. Constantinou CE, Govan DE: Spatial distribution and timing of transmitted and reflexly generated urethral pressures inhealthy women J Urol 1982: 127:969-9
  6. Van der Koo: JB, Van Wanray PT, de Jonge MC, Komelis JA. Time seperation between cough pulses in bladder, rectum and urethra. J. Urol 1894;132:1275-8
  7. Miklos JR, Sze-Elt, Karram MM. A critical appraisal of the methods of measuring leak point pressures in women with stress incontinance. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995; 86:349-52 8. Won J, McGuire EJ, Bloom DA, Ritchey ML. Stress leak point pressures: A diagnostic tool for incontinent children. J. Urol 1993; 150:700-2
  8. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick MC, Won J. Clinical assesment of uretral sphincter function. J Urol 1993; 150:1452-4. 10.McGuire ET, Appell RA. Transurethral collagen injection for urinary incontinence. Urology 1994:43:413-415.