SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2002 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 6

The comparison of quality of life using short form 36 in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair

Laparoskopik veya açık inguinal herni operasyonu geçiren hastalarda yaşam kalitesinin kısa form-36 kullanılarak karşılaştırılması

Tahsin ÇOLAK
TAMER AKÇA
Arzu KANIK
FAİK YAYLAK
Musa DİRLİK
Mehmet ÇAĞLIKÜLEKÇİ
Süha AYDIN
Pages
717–721
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: When compared the quality of life were better in patients who underwent LHR than OHR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare quality of life of patients who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair with the open mesh repair.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 50 consecutive patients with inguinal hernia were randomly allocated to perform laparoscopic (n=25) (LHR) or open mesh (n=25) repair (OHR).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: When compared the quality of life were better in patients who underwent LHR than OHR.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fıtık · kasık · Laparoskopi

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare quality of life of patients who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair with the open mesh repair. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 50 consecutive patients with inguinal hernia were randomly allocated to perform laparoscopic (n=25) (LHR) or open mesh (n=25) repair (OHR). Short form 36 was obtained before operation, postoperative 1st (PO1) and 10th (PO10) days. The form was divided to eight subcategories and these subcategories were evaluated within and between groups. RESULTS: In laparoscopic group, parameters were totally restricted and the pain increased in PO1 but these results were not statistically significant when compared with their preoperative values. In open group, physical functioning decreased and pain increased statistically significantly when compared PO1 to their preoperative values (p=0.017, p=0.048, respectively). However, other parameters decreased but these decreases were not statistically significant. LHR was superior to OHR in terms of physical functioning, social functioning and pain in comparison to PO1 values between groups. In PO10 evaluation, values of LHR patients were approximately equal or better than their preoperative values. However, values of OHR were worse than their preoperative values, but the differences were not statistically significant in either group. When compared LHR with OHR better results were obtained in all parameters. CONCLUSION: When compared the quality of life were better in patients who underwent LHR than OHR.

Özet

AMAÇ: Laparoskopik veya açık inguinal herni operasyonu geçiren hastalarda yaşam kalitesinin kısa form 36 kullanılarak karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: İnguinal herni onarımı yapılacak ardışık 50 hasta laparoskopik (n=25) (LHO) veya açık (n=25) onarım (AHO) yapılmak üzere rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Hastalara preoperatif, postoperatif birinci günde (PO1) ve 10. günde (PO10) kısa form 36 (SF-36) doldurtuldu. Form sekiz alt kategoriye ayrılarak her kategori, grup içinde ve gruplar arası değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: Laparoskopik gruptaki hastaların PO1 değerlerinin preoperatif değerleriyle karşılaştırıldığında tüm parametrelerde bir kısıtlanma ve ağrıda artmanın olduğu ancak bu değerlerin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı gözlendi. Açık onarımda tüm parametreler kısıtlandı ancak fiziksel fonksiyon ve ağrıdaki değişiklik istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (sırasıyla p=0.017, p=0.048). Guruplar arası değerlendirmede fiziksel kısıtlılık, sosyal rol ve ağrı parametreleri açısından LHO'nın AHO'na göre daha üstün olduğu saptandı. PO10 ise LHO yapılan hastaların değerleri, preoperatif değerlere eşit veya daha iyiydi. AHO yapılan hastalarda ise, halen preoperatif değerlerden düşüktü ancak preoperatif ve postoperatif değerler arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. LHO ile AHO PO10 değerleri açısından karşılaştırıldığında ise LHO yapılan hastaların tüm parametrelerinin daha iyi olduğu saptandı. SONUÇ: LHO yapılan hastaların, AHO yapılan hastalara göre yaşam kalitelerinin daha iyi olduğu gözlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOLAK, T., AKÇA, T., KANIK, A., YAYLAK, F., DİRLİK, M., ÇAĞLIKÜLEKÇİ, M., AYDIN, S. (2002). The comparison of quality of life using short form 36 in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 6, 717–721. https://ajindex.com/articles/279172

References (13)

  1. Chung RS, Rowland DY. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic vs. conventional inguinal hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 1999; 13:689-94.
  2. Bessel JR, Baxter P, Riddell P, Watkin S, Maddem GJ. A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair as a day surgical procedure. Surg Endosc 1996; 10:495-500.
  3. Lawrence K, Me Whinnie O, Goodwin A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic vs. open repair of inguinal hernia: early result. Br J Surg 1995; 311:981-5.
  4. Maddern GJ, Rudkin G, Bessell JR, Devitt P, Ponte L. A comparison of laparoscopic and open hernia repair as a day surgical procedure. Surg Endosc 1994; 8:1404-8.
  5. Paganini AM, Lezoche E, Carle F, et al. A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs. open tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 1998; 12:979-86.
  6. Heikkinen T, Haukipuro K, Leppala J, Hulkko A. Total cost of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs: a randomized prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997; 7:1-5.
  7. Kald A, Anderberg B, Carisson P, Park PO, Smed K. Surgical outcome and cost-minimization analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomized prospective trial with one-year follow up. Eur J Surg 1997; 163:505-10.
  8. Kozol R, Lange PN, Kosir N, et al. Prospective randomized study of open vs. laparoscopic inguinal hernia-'repair. Arçh Surg 1997; 132:292-5.
  9. Leim MSL, Van der Graaf Y, Van Steensel CJ,.et al Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 1.997; 336:1541 -7. Payne JH, Qrininger LM, Izawa MT, Podoll EF, Lindahl PJ, Balfour J. Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 1994; 129:973-9.
  10. Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Reiger R, Wayand W. Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 1996; 83:1563-6.
  11. Tschudi J, Wagner M, Klaiber Ch, et al. Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs. Shouldice herniorrhaphy, Surg Endosc 1996; 10:845-7.
  12. Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA. Preliminary result of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorraphy. Am J Surg 1995; 169:84-90.
  13. Lawrence K, Doll H, McWihinnie D. Relationship between health status and postoperative return to work. J