Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Incidental diagnosis of complete uterine septum during caserean section in a patient with 32-week pregnancy

32 haftalık bir gebede sezaryen sırasında tesadüfen saptanan komplet uterin septum

Pages
470–472
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper we represent a case of complete uterine septum diagnosed incidentally at caserean section of a 32-week pregnancy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Congenital uterine anomalies resulting from müllerian fusion defects are the most common types of malformations of the reproductive system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among those anomalies, the septate uterus is the most common one and associated with the poorest reproductive outcome.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper we represent a case of complete uterine septum diagnosed incidentally at caserean section of a 32-week pregnancy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sezaryen · Obstetrik doğum · prematür

Abstract

Congenital uterine anomalies resulting from müllerian fusion defects are the most common types of malformations of the reproductive system. Among those anomalies, the septate uterus is the most common one and associated with the poorest reproductive outcome. In this paper we represent a case of complete uterine septum diagnosed incidentally at caserean section of a 32-week pregnancy.

Özet

Müllerian füzyon defektlerine bağlı konjenital uterin anomaliler, reprodüktif sistem malformasyonlarının en sık rastlanan tipleridir. Bu anomaliler arasında septat uterus, en sık görülen ve reprodüktif sonucu en kötü olan anomalidir. Bu yazıda 32 haftalık bir gebelikte sezarten operasyonu sırasında tesadüfen saptanan bir komplet uterin septum olgusu sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNGÖR, S., BAŞER, İ., CEYHAN, S. T., GÖKTOLGA, Ü., ERGÜN, A. (2004). Incidental diagnosis of complete uterine septum during caserean section in a patient with 32-week pregnancy. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 470–472. https://ajindex.com/articles/278592

References (16)

  1. Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P. Reproductive erformance of women with uterine anomalies. Acta Obstet gynecol Scand 1982; 61:157-60.
  2. Green LK, Harris RE. Uterine anomalies. Frequency of diag- osis and associated obstetric complications. Obstet Gynecol 976; 47:427-9.
  3. Harger JH, Archer DF, Marchese SG, Muracca-Clemens M, iarver KL. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy losses and outcome f subsequent pregnancies. Öbstet Gynecol 1983; 62:547-81.
  4. Golan A, LangeF R, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Congenital nomalies of the mullerian system. Fertil Steril 1989; 51:747-55.
  5. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:2277-81.
  6. Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, Osborne NG. Congenital mullerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three- dimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:523-8.
  7. Ashton D, Amin HK, Richart RM, Neuwirth RS. The inciden­ ce of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilisation. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72:28-30. Aden P. Shall we operate on mullerian defects? Incidence of mullerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:1372-6.
  8. Raziel A, Arieli S, Bukovsky I, Caspi E, Golan A. Investigation of the uterine cavity in recurrent aborters. Fertil Steril 1994; 62:1080-2.
  9. Tho PT, Byrd JR, Me Donough PG. Etiologies and subsequent reproductive performance of 100 couples with recurrent abortion. Fertil Steril 1979; 32:389-95.
  10. Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H, Regan L. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary expe­ rience of 500 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod 1994; 9:1328-32.
  11. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000; 73:1-14. 13.Audebert AJM, Cittadini E, Cognat M. Habitual abortions and uterine malformations. Acta Eur Fertil 1983; 14:273-8.
  12. Musich JR, Behrman SJ. Obstetric outcome before and after metroplasty in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52:63-8.
  13. Portuonodo JA, Camara MM, Echanojauregui AD, Calonge J. Mullerian abnormalities in fertile women and recurrent aborters. J Reprod Med 1986; 31:616-9.
  14. Malhotra N, Sood M. Role of hysteroscopy in infertile women. J Indian Med Assoc 1997; 95:499-525.
  15. Perino A, Mencaglia L, Hamou J, Cittadini E. Hysteroscopy for metroplasty of uterine septa: report of 24 cases. Fertil Steril 1987; 48:321-3.
  16. Ellart D, Houze De L'Aulnoit H, Corette L, Delcroix M