Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6

To analyze pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum

Uterin septumlu olguların histeroskopik septum rezeksiyonu sonrası gebeliklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
701–704
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hysteroscopic resection of intrauterine septum is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from infertility, reccurrent pregnancy wastage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To asses the safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic resection of the uterine septum.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This article is a retrospective review of cases 1996-2002.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hysteroscopic resection of intrauterine septum is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from infertility, reccurrent pregnancy wastage.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gebelik sonucu · Sonuçların tekrarlanabilirliği · Histeroskopi

Abstract

Objective: To asses the safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic resection of the uterine septum. Material and Methods: This article is a retrospective review of cases 1996-2002. A septate uterus was diagnosed in a total 38 patients and all were by treated by hysteroscopic resection. We evaluated 30 patients of them. Results: The rate of preoperative pregnancy loss was 93.4% and there was no uncomplicated delivery. After hysteroscopic septum resection we reported the rate of pregnancy loss was 34.6% and uncomplicated delivery rate was 61.5%. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic treatment of uterine septa is a safe, simple and effective procedure. Hysteroscopic resection of intrauterine septum is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from infertility, reccurrent pregnancy wastage.

Özet

Amaç: Uterin septumun histeroskopik rezeksiyonunun etkinliği ve güvenirliliğini saptamak Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 1996-2002 yılları arasında uterin septum nedeniyle histeroskopik septum rezeksiyonu yapılan 38 olgudan 30'u değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Preoperatif gebelik kayıp oranı %93.4 ve canlı term doğum yok iken postoperatif dönemde gebelik kaybı %34.6 ve canlı term doğum oranı %61.5 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Uterin septumun histeroskopi ile tedavisi basit etkili ve güvenilir bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANCI, M., İMREN, A., ŞAHİN, E., NORGAZ, E. B., SADIK, S., KOLDAY, K., ÖNOĞLU, A. S. (2004). To analyze pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6, 701–704. https://ajindex.com/articles/278536

References (1)

  1. Rock JA, Jones HW. Jr.Clinical management of the double terus. Fertil Steril. 1977; 28:798-806. 2.Muasher SJ, Acosta AA, Garcia JE, Rosenwaks Z, Jones HW Jr. Wedge metroplasty for the septate uterus an update, Fertil Steril. 1984; 42:515. 3.Khaliga E, Taner JP, Jones Hw Jr. The role of abdominal metroplasty in the era of operative hysterescopy Surg. Gynecol Obstet. 1993; 176:208-211. 4.Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Bontis JN. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysterescopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7:161-74. 5.Hickok LR. Hysteroscopic treatment of the uterine septum: a clinician's experience.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182:1414-20. 6.Szamatowicz J, Tomaszewska I. The effectiveness of hysterescopic intrauterine septum resection in terms of reproductive outcome. Gynecol Pol 1998; 69:757-60. 7.Howe RS. Third-trimester uterine rupture following hysteres­ copic uterine perforation.Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81:827-9. 8.Lobaugh ML, Bammel BM, Duke D. Uterine rupture during pregnancy in a patient with a history of hysterscopic metroplasty. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:838-40. 9.Kermis P, Zolti M. Uterine rupture after hysterescopic rezection of uterine septum. Fertil Steril 2002; 77:618-20. 10.Propst AM, Liberman RF. Complications of hysterescopic surgery Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:517-20.