Journals / Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Algorithms for reducing the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoskopik kolesistektomide komplikasyonları önleme prosedürlerimiz

Pages
408–414
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, we can say that using preoperative evaluation and performing intensive surgery lower the complication rates in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is accepted as a gold standard in the surgical treatment of cholelithiasis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs more training then open cholecystectomy there is a need for algorithms for surgical procedures in order to have low complication rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, we can say that using preoperative evaluation and performing intensive surgery lower the complication rates in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kolesistektomi · laparoskopik · Algoritma

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is accepted as a gold standard in the surgical treatment of cholelithiasis. As laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs more training then open cholecystectomy there is a need for algorithms for surgical procedures in order to have low complication rates. Material and Method: We tested our algorithms using 120 laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in Zonguldak Karaelmas University General Surgery Department between April 2001 and April 2004. Results: There were no major complications. In six cases, cholecystectomy was performed by open surgical procedure. In one case there was a biliary leakage which lasted more than fifteen days and needed an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. By the use of preoperative evaluation algorithm and the standardization of surgical procedures there were no major complications in our patient group. Conclusion: In conclusion, we can say that using preoperative evaluation and performing intensive surgery lower the complication rates in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Özet

Amaç: Kolelitiazis tedavisinde laparoskopik kolesistektomi günümüzde altın standart olarak kabul edilmekle birlikte açık kolesistektomideki son derece düşük komplikasyon oranları bu metotla artış göstermiştir. Açık kolesistektomiye göre daha fazla deneyim gerektiren laparoskopik kolesistektomi için belirli algoritmalar ve cerrahi prosedür standardizasyonları geliştirmek komplikasyonları azaltmada yararlı olmaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: ZKÜ Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Kliniği'nde Nisan 2001 ile Nisan 2004 tarihleri arasında yapılan 120 laparoskopik kolesistektomi vakası komplikasyonlar açısından ele alınarak uyguladığımız algoritmaların güvenilirliği gözden geçirilmiştir. Bulgular: Toplam 120 hastanın hiç birinde majör komplikasyon görülmemiştir. Altı hastada açık cerrahiye dönme, bir hastada 15 gün süren safra sızıntısı görülmüş ve endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatografi sonrası gerilemiştir. Uyguladığımız preoperatif hasta değerlendirme algoritması ve cerrahi prosedürlerde uyguladığımız tehlikeli noktaların standardizasyonu ile 120 vakalık serimizde majör komplikasyon ile karşılaşılmamıştır. Sonuç: Sonuçta laparoskopik kolesistektomi vakaları için iyi bir preoperatif değerlendirme ve cerrahi detaylarda dikkatli olunması daha başarılı sonuçlar doğuracaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CİHAN, A., ACUN, Z., CÖMERT, M., UÇAN, B., ULUKENT, S. C., CESUR, A., ÜSTÜNDAĞ, Y., AYDEMİR, S. (2004). Algorithms for reducing the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medical Network Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 408–414. https://ajindex.com/articles/278522

References (9)

  1. Williams LF Jr, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, McGee EC Jr, Boyd RW, Jacobs JK. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 1993; 165:459-65. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystec- tomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1073-8.
  2. Dunn D, Nair R, Fowler S, McCloy R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England and Wales: results of an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76:269-75. Orlando R 3rd, Russell JC, Lynch J, Mattie A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry. Arch Surg 1993; 128:494-8; discussion 498-9.
  3. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4.292 hospitals and an analysis of 77.604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165:9-14. Mahatharadol V. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic chole­ cystectomy: an audit of 1522 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51:12-4.
  4. Gentileschi P, Di Paola M, Catarci M, et al. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a 1994-2001 audit on 13.718 operations in the area of Rome. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:232-6. Olsen DO. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystec­ tomy: a decade of experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000; 7:35-9.
  5. Ooi LL, Goh YC, Chew SP, et al. Bile duct injuries during la­paroscopic cholecystectomy: a collective experience of four teaching hospitals and results of repair. Aust N Z J Surg 1999; 69:844-6.
  6. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 2003; 237:460-9.
  7. Chapman WC, Abecassis M, Jarnagin W, Mulvihill S, Stras- berg SM. Bile duct injuries 12 years after the introduction of la­ paroscopic cholecystectomy. J. Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:412-6.
  8. Chaudhary A, Manisegran M, Chandra A, Agarwal AK, Şachdev AK. How do bile duct injuries sustained during laparos­copic cholecystectomy differ from those during open cholecys­tectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2001; 11:187-91.
  9. Berci G, Morgenstem L. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:1091. Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, Lynch JT. Bile duct inju­ ries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparos­ copic Cholecystectomy Registry. Arch Surg 1996; 131:382-8. Olsen D. Bile duct injuries