Journals / Megaron / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Katılımlı planlama süreçlerini etkileyen etkileşim düzeyindeki sosyo-psikolojik faktörler

Socio-psychological factors affecting participatory planning processes at interactional level

Journal
Megaron
Pages
1–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on previous discussions in participation literature, the ultimate aim of this study is to provide subsequent researchers and those involved in participatory planning practices with a framework on the socio-psychological dimensions, namely communication, power, attribution, relationships and persuasion, of participatory processes at interactional level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, it is widely accepted that communities need to collaborate when making decisions on behalf of the individual, society and the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence, planners engaged in participatory initiatives need to understand how best to design and carry out a participatory planning process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on previous discussions in participation literature, the ultimate aim of this study is to provide subsequent researchers and those involved in participatory planning practices with a framework on the socio-psychological dimensions, namely communication, power, attribution, relationships and persuasion, of participatory processes at interactional level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today, it is widely accepted that communities need to collaborate when making decisions on behalf of the individual, society and the environment. Hence, planners engaged in participatory initiatives need to understand how best to design and carry out a participatory planning process. In order to answer this question, all factors affecting participatory processes need to be determined, since only then can steps be taken to design and execute the best participatory process for each stakeholder in every unique context. By focusing particularly on the factors affecting participatory processes at interactional level, this study aims to determine the socio-psychological dimensions of participatory planning processes, the aim being to bring to light some hitherto unexplained factors involved and thus help to improve these processes. Based on previous discussions in participation literature, the ultimate aim of this study is to provide subsequent researchers and those involved in participatory planning practices with a framework on the socio-psychological dimensions, namely communication, power, attribution, relationships and persuasion, of participatory processes at interactional level.

Özet

Günümüz dünyasında bireylerin toplum ve çevrelerine ilişkin karar alma süreçlerine katılımlarının gerekliliği yaygın olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu nedenle katılımlı pratiklerle uğraşan plancıların nasıl daha iyi katılımlı planlama süreçleri tasarlayıp sürdürebilecekleri sorusuna cevap bulmaları gerekmektedir. Bu soruya cevap bulmak için ise katılımlı süreçleri etkileyen tüm faktörler belirlenmelidir, çünkü ancak katılımlı süreçlerin tüm boyutları anlaşıldığında her bir özgün bağlamda tüm paydaşlar için en iyi katılımlı sürecin tasarlanıp sürdürülmesine yönelik gerekli adımlar atılabilir. Katılımlı süreçleri etkileyen faktörlerden bireylerarası etkileşim düzeyindeki faktörlere odaklanan bu çalışmanın amacı katılımlı planlama süreçlerinin sosyo-psikolojik boyutlarını belirlemektir. Bu yolla katılımlı süreçlerin keşfedilmemiş bir boyutu, katılımlı süreçleri geliştirmek niyetiyle eleştirel bir yaklaşımla ortaya koyulacaktır. Çalışmanın sonucunda gelecek araştırmalar ve katılımlı planlama pratikleri için katılımlı süreçlerin bireylerarası etkileşim düzeyindeki sosyo-psikolojik boyutları, iletişim, güç, atfetme, ilişkiler ve ikna etme olarak planlama literatürüne dayalı olarak ortaya koyulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KULÖZÜ, N., TEKELi, İ. (2014). Katılımlı planlama süreçlerini etkileyen etkileşim düzeyindeki sosyo-psikolojik faktörler. Megaron, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 1–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/276656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adamson, D. (2010) Identifying the barriers to purposeful citizen participation. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 30, no. 3/4, 114-126
  2. Bentrup, G. (2001) Evaluation of a Collaborative Model: A Case Study Analysis of Watershed Planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management 27, no.5, 739-748
  3. Brand, R., and Gaffikin, F. (2007) Collaborative Planning in Uncollaborative World. Planning Theory 6, no.3, 282- 313
  4. Buchy, M., and Hoverman, S. (2000) Understanding Public Participation in Forest Planning: A Review. Forest Policy and Economics 1, 15-25
  5. Burton, R.J.F. (2004) Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 20, 359-371
  6. Carnes, S.A., Schweitzer. M., Peelle, E.B., Wolfe, A.K., and Munro, J.F. (1998) Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the U.S. Department of Energy. Technology in Society 20, 385–406
  7. Cooke, B. (2001) The Social Psychological Limits of Participation? In Participation: a New Tyranny? edited by B. Cooke, and U. Kothari, 102-121. Zed Books, London, Newyork
  8. Cooper, J. (2002) Evaluating Public Participation in the Environmental Assessment of Trade Negotiations. Report for Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, December
  9. Crosby, N., Kelly, J.M., and Schaefer, P. (1986) Citizens Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review 46, no.2, 170-178
  10. Dahl, R. (1957) The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2(2), 201-215
  11. Dalton, T.M. (2006) Exploring Participants’ Views of Participatory Coastal and Marine Resource Management Processes. Coastal Management 34, 351-367
  12. Denhardt, J., Terry, L., Delacruz, E.R., and Andonoska, L. (2009) Barriers to Citizen Engagement in Developing Countries, International Journal of Public Administration, 32 (14), 1268-1288
  13. Dietz, T., Stern, P.C., and Guagnano, G.A. (1998) Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental Concern. Environment and Behaviour 30 (4), 450-471
  14. Douglas, A.B. (2006) Exploring the Barriers to Community Involvement in Public Transportation: The Case of Capital Metro. Public Administration Program Applied Research Projects. An Applied Research Project Submitted to the Department of Political Science Texas State University, Spring
  15. Dowling, B., Powell, M., and Glendinning, C. (2004) Conceptualising