Journals / Megaron / 2018 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Factors Affecting the Romani Residential Segregation: Aydoğdu Neighbourhood, Tekirdağ, Turkey

Romanların Konut Ayrışmasını Etkileyen Faktörler: Aydoğdu Mahallesi, Tekirdağ

Journal
Megaron
Pages
263–276
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Residential segregation of the Romani, although based on both choice and necessity, due to the practices on the demand side of the housing market and the limited resources of the households, tends to be a forced choice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Romani residential segregation is a manifestation of a multidimensional social exclusion process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total, 320 households were interviewed, and in-depth interviews were done with authorities from Romani associations and related institutions, and spatial analysis was carried out regarding the neighbourhood’s housing and settlement pattern to analyse the choices and constraints on housing of the Romani.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Residential segregation of the Romani, although based on both choice and necessity, due to the practices on the demand side of the housing market and the limited resources of the households, tends to be a forced choice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Romani residential segregation is a manifestation of a multidimensional social exclusion process. Residential segregation of a minority ethnic group reflects the social context. In this article, in the context of Turkey, the aim is to explain the factors influencing the Romani residential segregation through an Aydoğdu Romani neighbourhood case study and to evaluate the future of Romani housing. In total, 320 households were interviewed, and in-depth interviews were done with authorities from Romani associations and related institutions, and spatial analysis was carried out regarding the neighbourhood’s housing and settlement pattern to analyse the choices and constraints on housing of the Romani. Residential segregation of the Romani, although based on both choice and necessity, due to the practices on the demand side of the housing market and the limited resources of the households, tends to be a forced choice.

Özet

Romanların konut ayrışması, çok boyutlu sosyal dışlanma sürecinin bir tezahürüdür. Bir azınlık etnik grubun konut ayrışması, toplumsal bağlamın bir yansımasıdır. Bu nedenle makalede, Türkiye bağlamında, Tekirdağ Aydoğdu mahallesi örneği üzerinden Romanların konut ayrışmasını etkileyen faktörleri açıklamak ve bu bağlamda, Romanların konut kariyerinin geleceğini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Romanların konut seçimi ve kısıtlamalarını analiz etmek için mahalledeki 320 hane ile anket yapılmış, Roman dernekleri ve ilgili kurumlardan yetkililerle derin görüşmeler yapılmış ve mahallenin konut ve yerleşim dokusuna ilişkin mekânsal analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Romanların konut ayrışmasının; hem gönüllülüğe hem de zorunluluğa dayanmakla birlikte, konut piyasasının arz tarafındaki uygulamalar ve hanehalkının sahip olduğu kısıtlı kaynaklar nedeniyle daha çok zorunlu bir tercih olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKCE, D. (2018). Factors Affecting the Romani Residential Segregation: Aydoğdu Neighbourhood, Tekirdağ, Turkey. Megaron, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 263–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/276540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Akkan, B.E., Deniz, M.B. ve Ertan, M. (2011)
  2. Sosyal Dışlanmanın Roman Halleri, İstanbul,
  3. Punto Baskı.
  4. Aksu, M. (2003) Türkiye’de Çingene Olmak, İstanbul,
  5. Ozan Yayıncılık. Arayıcı, A. (2008) Avrupa’nın Vatansızları Çingeneler, İstanbul,
  6. Kalkedon Yayınları.
  7. Arayıcı, A. (2009) “Gypsies: The Forgotten People of Turkey”, International Social Science Journal, Vol.59/193–194, p.527-538.
  8. Berger, H. (2000)
  9. Çingene Mitolojisi, Çev.M.Y.Sağlam, Ankara,
  10. Ayraç Yayınları.
  11. Bolt, G. S. and van Kempen, R. (1997) “Segregation and Turks’ Housing Conditions in Middle-Sized Dutch Cities”, New Community, Vol.23, p.363-384.
  12. Bolt, G., van Kempen, R. and van Ham, M. (2008) “Minority Ethnic Groups in the Dutch Housing Market: Spatial Segregation, Relocation Dynamics and Housing Policy”, Urban Studies, Vol.45:7, p.1359-1384.
  13. Clark, W. A. V. (1992) “Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multi-Ethnic Context”, Demography, Vol.29, p. 351-466.
  14. Clark, W.A.V. and Dieleman, F.M. (1996) Households and Housing: Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market, New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research. Cozma,T., Cucos, C. and Momanu, M. (2000) “The Education of Roma Children in Romania: Description, Difficulties, Solutions”, Intercultural Education, Vol.11(3), p. 281-288.
  15. Ellis, G. and Mcwhirter, C. (2008) “Land-use Planning and Traveller-Gypsies: Towards Non-prejudicial Practice”, Planning Practice & Research, Vol.23(1), p.77-99.
  16. Greenfields, M. and Smith, D. (2010) “Housed Gypsy Travellers, Social Segregation and the Reconstruction of Communities”, Housing Studies, Vol.25:3, p. 397-412.
  17. Gültekin, N. and Güzey, Ö. (2007). “Divided Cities: Social and Residential Segregation: A Gypsy Neighborhood in Menzilahir, Edirne, Turkey”, 47th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Paris. Gültekin, N. (2009) “The Impact of Social Exclusion in Residential Segregation: A Gypsy Neighbourhood Fevzi Pasa in Turkey”, G.U. Journal of Science, Vol.22(3), p.245-256.
  18. Güzey, Ö. (2009) “Sulukule’de Kentsel Dönüşüm: Devlet Eliyle Soylulaştırma”, Mimarlık, Vol.346, s.73-79.
  19. Home, R. (2002) “Negotiating Security of Tenure for Peri-Urban Settlement: Traveller-Gypsies and the Planning System in the United Kingdom”, Habitat International, Vol.26, p.335–346.
  20. Kolukırık, S. (2009) “Sosyolojik Perspektiften Türk(iye) Çingeneleri: İzmir Çingeneleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Dünden Bugüne Çingeneler, İstanbul, Ozan Yayıncılık, s.11-58.
  21. Ladanyi, I. J. (1993) “Patterns of Residential Segregation an