Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Assessment of Differences in ISO 9001: 2015 from Enterprises Point of View

ISO 9001:2015 ile Ortaya Çıkan Farklılıkların İşletmelerin Bakış Açısıyla Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
3516–3532
Publication Date
2019-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it was seen that the management played a leading role in the acquisition of the document and focused cost, and the employees played in the internalization and focused additional workload.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The series of ISO 9001 standards arose in response to increasingly difficult competition conditions in the markets and represent the sum of activities that include planning, organizing, directing and ultimately controlling of quality in order to provide appropriate products to consumers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the differences between ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 9001: 2015 are explained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it was seen that the management played a leading role in the acquisition of the document and focused cost, and the employees played in the internalization and focused additional workload.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:ISO 9001:2008 · ISO 9001:2015 · ISO 9001:2015 farklılıkları

Abstract

The series of ISO 9001 standards arose in response to increasingly difficult competition conditions in the markets and represent the sum of activities that include planning, organizing, directing and ultimately controlling of quality in order to provide appropriate products to consumers. In this study, the differences between ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 9001: 2015 are explained. The purpose of this study is to define the gains, deficiencies and effects of these differences for enterprises. In this direction, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 enterprises in Denizli Organized Industrial Zone. Difficulty in reaching the actual number of companies, lack of competence or very limited time of the staff are the limitations of the study. Consequently, it was seen that the management played a leading role in the acquisition of the document and focused cost, and the employees played in the internalization and focused additional workload.

Özet

ISO 9001 standartlar serisi piyasalarda giderek zorlaşan rekabet koşullarına cevaben doğmuştur ve tüketiciye uygun ürün sunmak için kalitenin planlanması, düzenlenmesi, yönlendirilmesi ve nihai olarak kontrol edilmesini içeren faaliyetler toplamını ifade etmektedir. Çalışma kapsamında ISO 9001:2008’den ISO 9001:2015’e güncelleme sonucunda ortaya çıkan farklılıklar açıklanmıştır. Bu farklılıkların işletmelerin bakış açısıyla kazanımlarının, eksikliklerinin ve etkilerinin tanımlanması çalışmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda 14 soruluk form kullanılarak, Denizli Organize Sanayi Bölgesi’nde yer alan 9 işletme ile yarı yapılandırılmış mülakatlar yapılmıştır. Denizli OSB’de belgeye sahip işletmelerin gerçek sayısına ulaşmadaki zorluk, mülakat için işletme tarafından görevlendirilen personelin yetkin olmaması ve görevli personelin yetkin ancak yoğun çalışma koşulları nedeniyle çok kısıtlı zaman ayırması çalışmanın kısıtlarıdır. Sonuç olarak belgenin edinimi noktasında yönetimin, içselleştirilmesi noktasında ise çalışanların başrol oynadığı görülmüştür. İlaveten ISO 9001:2015 ile doğan farklılıklara yöneticilerin maliyet, çalışanların ise ek iş yükü getirme odaklı baktıkları gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAŞ, Z., SAVAŞ, H. (2019). Assessment of Differences in ISO 9001: 2015 from Enterprises Point of View. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 3516–3532. https://ajindex.com/articles/2752

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Abuhav, I. (2017). ISO 9001:2015 - A Complete Guide to Quality Management Systems. Florida: Taylor & Francis Group. Cianfrani, C. A., & West, J. E. (2010). Cracking the Case of ISO 9001:2008 for Manufacturing (2. b.). Milwaukee: Quality Press.
  2. Deysher, B. (2015). A “Risk Based Thinking” Model for ISO 9001:2015. http://rube.asq.org/audit/2015/01/a-risk-based-thinking-model-for-iso-9001-2015.pdf adresinden alındı DNV-GL. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Requirements Guidance Document. DNV-GL. https://www.dnvgl.be/publications/the-new-iso-9001-2015-63171 adresinden alındı European Standart ISO 9000. (2015). Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary (ISO 9000:2015). Brussels: ISO. Fonseca, L. M. (2014). ISO 9001:2015 Revision. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management, (s. 391-400).
  3. Fonseca, L. M. (2015). From Quality Gurus and TQM to ISO 9001: 2015: A Review of Several Quality Paths. International Journal for Quality Research, 9(1), 167–180.Hoyle, D. (2009). ISO 9000 Quality Systems Handbook (6. b.). USA: Elsevier Ltd. ISO. ISO 9001:2015 How to Use It? Aralık 17, 2017 tarihinde https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/iso_9001-2015_-_how_to_use_it.pdf adresinden alındı ISO. Moving From ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015. Aralık 17, 2017 tarihinde ISo Web Sitesi: https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/iso_9001_-_moving_from_2008_to_2015.pdf adresinden alındı Kalitest. ISO 9001:2015 Revizyonu Geçiş Kılavuzu. Kasım 24, 2017 tarihinde Kalitest Web Sitesi: https://www.kalitest.com.tr/uploaded/files/9001-2015%20Ge%C3%A7i%C5%9F%20K%C4%B1lavuzu%20web.pdf adresinden alındı Medić, S., Karlović, B., & Cindrić, Z. (2016). New Standart ISO 9001:2015 and Its Effect on Organisations. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 14(2), 188-193.
  4. Natarajan, D. (2017). ISO 9001 Quality Management System. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. PJR. Preparing for the Change – Transition to ISO 9001:2015. Kasım 24, 2017 tarihinde PJR Web Sitesi: http://www.pjr.com/downloads/ISO%209001%20Transition%20FAQ.pdf adresinden alındı Psomas, E. L., Fotopoulos, C. V., & Kafetzopoulos, D. v. (2011).
  5. Core Process Management Practices, Quality Tools and Quality Improvement in ISO 9001 Certified Manufacturing Companies. Business Process Management Journal, 17(3), 437-460.
  6. Psomas, E. L., Pantouvakis, A., & Kafetzopoulos, D. P. (2013). The impact of ISO 900