Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Organizational Silence from the Perspective of Instructors

Pages
799–863
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When all the findings are evaluated, creating a more democratic culture by having a participatory administrative mentality at universities is defined as the most important suggestion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reveal the organizational silence perceptions of the instructors who work in different academic units of a state university in Aegean Region of Turkey, factors causing silence and possible consequences of silence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, mixed research method was used to determine and elaborate the types of organizational silence seen among instructors, the reasons and consequences of organizational silence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When all the findings are evaluated, creating a more democratic culture by having a participatory administrative mentality at universities is defined as the most important suggestion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study aims to reveal the organizational silence perceptions of the instructors who work in different academic units of a state university in Aegean Region of Turkey, factors causing silence and possible consequences of silence. In this study, mixed research method was used to determine and elaborate the types of organizational silence seen among instructors, the reasons and consequences of organizational silence. First, quantitative data collection method was used and the data obtained by the researcher was analyzed by using quantitative analyzing techniques. So, this research was designed as “Sequential Explanatory Design”. The population of study consisted of 1301 instructors working in different academic units. The sample of the study consisted of 376 instructors who were selected by using cluster sampling method. In qualitative phase, 12 instructors were determined by maximum variation sampling method. In this study, Organizational Silence Scale which includes 15 items was used to get the quantitative data and an interview form which has 6 questions was used to get the qualitative data. As a result of this study, it can be said that inexperienced instructors, the instructors who have just started their academic career and the ones who are concerned about academic promotion remain silent at the university. It is also considered that the silence of senior instructors is based on their prior learned helplessness experiences. One of the most significant results of this study is that academic hierarchy is a phenomenon which has a negative impact on silence. When all the findings are evaluated, creating a more democratic culture by having a participatory administrative mentality at universities is defined as the most important suggestion.

🔖

Cite This Article

EVREN, H. U., SARPKAYA, P. Y. (2020). Organizational Silence from the Perspective of Instructors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 799–863. https://ajindex.com/articles/274482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akan, B. B. ve Oran, Ç. F. (2017). Akademisyenlerin örgütsel sessizlik algıları: Konuya ilişkin bir uygulama. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 6(5), 72-90.
  2. Akbaş, M., Gemlik, H. N. ve Çatar, R. Ö. (2020). Örgütsel sessizlik ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi: Vakıf üniversitesi akademisyenleri üzerine bir araştırma. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi,3 (3), 98-126.
  3. Aktaş, H. ve Şimşek E. (2014). Örgütsel sessizlik ile algılanan bireysel performans, örgüt kültürü ve demografik değişkenler arasındaki etkileşim. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, (14)28, 24-52.
  4. Akturan, A., Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu, H. ve Acaray, A. (2015). Determining the effect of knowledge sharing, teamworking and transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behaviors in information society. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 9(1), 75-86.
  5. Algın, İ. (2014). Üniversitelerde örgütsel sessizlik. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara,
  6. Türkiye. Algın, İ. ve Başkan, G. A. (2015). Üniversitelerde örgütsel sessizliğin olası sonuçları. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 5(2), 81-90.
  7. Alparslan, A. M. (2010). Örgütsel sessizlik iklimi ve işgören sessizlik davranışları arasındaki etkileşim: Mehmet Akif Ersoy üniversitesi öğretim elemanları üzerinde bir araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Isparta, Türkiye. Altınışık, A. (2017). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel sessizlik davranışları ile örgüt kültürü arasındaki ilişki. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi,
  8. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın, Türkiye. Apak, F. (2016). Okul yöneticilerinin gücü kullanma biçimleri ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel sessizlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. (Yayımlanmamış yüsek lisans tezi, Okan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul,
  9. Türkiye. Aydin, İ., Erdemli, Ö., Demir, T. G. & Toptaş, B. B. (2016,). “Silence belongs to the young, speech belongs to the old”: The reason why research assistants remain silent. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(4), 109-118.
  10. Ayduğ, D., Himmetoğlu, B. ve Turhan, E. (2017). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel sessizliğe ilişkin görüşlerinin nitel bir araştırma ile incelenmesi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 1120-1143.
  11. Bagheri, G., Zarei, R. & Aeen, M. N. (2012). Organizational silence (Basic concepts and its development factors), Ideal Type of Management, 1(1), 47-58.
  12. Bayın, G