Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Laktik asit bakterisi ve enzim karışımı inokulantlarının ayçiçeği silajlarının fermantasyonu ve besin maddelerinin sindirilebilirliği üzerine etkileri

The effects of lactic acid bacteria and enzyme mixture ınoculants on fermentation and nutrient digestibility of sunflower silage

Pages
195–199
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lactic acid bacteria+enzyme decreased (P<0.002) neutral detergent fiber content and increased in vivo organic matter and acid detergent fiber digestibility of silages (P<0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the effects of lactic acid bacteria and lactic acid bacteria+enzyme mixture inoculants as silage additives, on the fermentation and nutrient digestibility in lambs fed sunflower silage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pioneer 1174 (Iowa, USA), and Sil-All (Alltech, UK) were used as lactic acid bacteria and lactic acid bacteria+enzyme mixture inoculants, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lactic acid bacteria+enzyme decreased (P<0.002) neutral detergent fiber content and increased in vivo organic matter and acid detergent fiber digestibility of silages (P<0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:enzimler · kimyasal analizler · sindirilebilirlik

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of lactic acid bacteria and lactic acid bacteria+enzyme mixture inoculants as silage additives, on the fermentation and nutrient digestibility in lambs fed sunflower silage. Pioneer 1174 (Iowa, USA), and Sil-All (Alltech, UK) were used as lactic acid bacteria and lactic acid bacteria+enzyme mixture inoculants, respectively. Inoculants were applied at 6.00 log10 cfu/g silage levels. Sunflower was harvested at the dough stage and ensiled in 120 litre capacity plastic containers. Three plastic container from each group were sampled for chemical and microbiological analyses on day 60 after ensiling. In addition, in vivo nutrition digestibility of silages were determined. Both inoculants increased fermentation qualities of sunflower. Lactic acid bacteria+enzyme decreased (P<0.002) neutral detergent fiber content and increased in vivo organic matter and acid detergent fiber digestibility of silages (P<0.05).

Özet

Bu çalışma silaj katkı maddesi olarak kullanılan laktik asit bakterisi ve laktik asit bakterisi +enzim karışımı inokulantların, ayçiçeği silajlarının fermantasyon ve toklularda besin maddelerinin sindirilebilirlik özellikleri üzerindeki etkilerinin saptanması amacı ile düzenlenmiştir. Laktik asit bakterisi inokulantı olarak Pioneer 1174 (Iowa, USA) ve laktik asit bakterisi +enzim karışımı inokulantı olarak ise Sil-All (Allteck, UK) kullanılmıştır. İnokulantlar silajlara 6.00 log10 cfu/g düzeyinde katılmışlardır. Ayçiçeği, hamur olum döneminde hasat edilmiş ve 120 litrelik plastik bidonlarda silolanmıştır. Silolamadan sonraki 60. günde her gruptan 3' er plastik bidon açWlarak silajlarda kimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik analizler yapılmıştır. Ayrıca bu silajların, besin maddelerinin sindirilebilirlikleri saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak her iki inokulant da, ayçiçeği silajlarının fermantasyon özelliklerini artırmıştır. Laktik asit bakterisi +enzim karışımı inokulantı nötral deterjanlarda çözünmeyen lif içeriklerini azaltmış (P<0.002), in vivo organik madde ve asit deterjanlarda çözünmeyen lif sindirilebilirliklerini artırmıştır (P<0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDÜVEN, M. L., KOÇ, F., POLAT, C., COŞKUNTUNA, L. (2009). Laktik asit bakterisi ve enzim karışımı inokulantlarının ayçiçeği silajlarının fermantasyonu ve besin maddelerinin sindirilebilirliği üzerine etkileri. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 195–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/273852

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Filya I: Silaj kalitesinin arttWrWlmasWnda yeni gelişmeler. International Animal Nutrition Congress’2000, s. 243-250, Isparta, 2000
  2. McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE: The Biochemistry of Silage. Chalcombe Publications, 13 Highwoods drive, Marlow Bottom, Marlow, Bucks, UK, 1991
  3. Sucu E, Filya İ: The effects of bacterial inoculants on the fermentation, aerobic stability and rumen degradability characteristics of wheat silages. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 30, 187- 193, 2006
  4. Sheperd AC, Maslanka M, Quinn D, Kung L: Additives containing bacteria and enzymes for alfalfa silage. J Dairy Sci, 78, 565-572, 1995
  5. Aksu T, Baytok E, Bolat D: Effects of a bacterial silage inoculant on corn silage fermentation and nutrient digestibility. Small Rumin Res, 55, 249-252, 2004
  6. Stokes M, Chen J: Effects of an enzyme-inoculant mixture on the course of fermentation of corn silage. J Dairy Sci, 77, 3401-3409, 1994
  7. Kung L, Tung RS, Maciorowski KG, Buffum K, Knutsen K, Aimutis WR: Effects of plant cell-wall-degrading enzymes and lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation and composition. J Dairy Sci, 74, 4284-4296, 1991
  8. Chen J, Stokes MR, Wallace CR: Effects of enzymeinoculant systems on preservation and nutritive value of hay crop and corn silages. J Dairy Sci, 77, 501-512, 1994
  9. Nadeau EMG, Buxton DR, Russell JR, Allison MJ, Young JW: Enzyme, bacterial inoculant, and formic acid effects on silage composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa. J Dairy Sci, 83: 1487-1502, 2000
  10. Nadeau EMG, Russell JR, Buxton DR: Intake, digestibility, and composition of orchardgrass and alfalfa silages treated with cellulase, inoculant, and formic acid fed to lambs. J Anim Sci, 78, 2980-2989, 2000
  11. Demirel M, Bolat D, Çelik S, Bakici Y, Çelik S: Quality of silages from sunflower harvested at different vegetational stages. J Appl Anim Res, 30, 161-165, 2006
  12. Anonymus: The Analysis of Agricultural Material, Reference Book: pp. 427-428, London, 1986
  13. Playne MJ, Mc Donald P: The buffering constituent of herbage and of silage. J Sci Food Agric, 17, 264-268, 1966
  14. SAS: Statistical Analysis System. User Guide: Statistics, Version 6 Edition. SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, NC, 1988
  15. Seale DR, Pahlow G, Spoelstra SF, Lindgren S, Dellaglio F, Lowe JF: Methods for the microbiological analysis of silage. Proceeding of the Eurobac Conference, 147, Uppsala, 1990
  16. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia,