Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Süt üretimini etkileyen faktörler ve süt üretim maliyeti: Çanakkale İli biga İlçesi örneği

The factors affecting milk production and milk production cost: Çanakkale case - biga

Pages
329–335
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it has been found that silage maize (20%) and barley(14%) have the biggest effect on the milk yield.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between milk production and the factors used in milk production have been analyzed and the cost of milk production has been calculated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data used for this study has been acquired from 94 dairy cattle breeder enterprises by the face to face survey method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it has been found that silage maize (20%) and barley(14%) have the biggest effect on the milk yield.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hordeum vulgare · Türkiye · Zea mays

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between milk production and the factors used in milk production have been analyzed and the cost of milk production has been calculated. The data used for this study has been acquired from 94 dairy cattle breeder enterprises by the face to face survey method. It has been determined that the forage and concentrated feed costs compose 57% of the total production costs and 71% of the variable costs. It has been also determined that the dairy cattle breeding production division of the costs belong to 20.99% of productive stock value (PSA), 76.31% of milk production and 2.7% of manure production and 1 kg milk cost has been calculated as 0.29$. Additionally, according to the path analysis, it has been found out that the 61.49% variation resulting from the milk production can be explained with the changes resulting in the use of forage and concentrated feed. Through the path analysis, the direct and indirect effects of the feed materials used on the milk production have been analyzed. As a result, it has been found that silage maize (20%) and barley(14%) have the biggest effect on the milk yield.

Özet

Süt üretimi ile süt üretiminde kullanılan faktörler arasındaki ilişkilerin incelendiği ve süt üretim maliyetinin hesaplandığı bu çalışmada kullanılan veriler süt sığırcılığı üretim faaliyetinde bulunan 94 işletmeden yüz yüze anket yöntemi ile elde edilmiştir. Süt sığırcılığında kaba ve kesif yem masraflarının toplam üretim masrafları içerisinde %57 ve değişen masraflar içerisinde ise %71’ini oluşturduğu belirlenmiştir. Süt sığırcılığı üretim masraflarının %20.99’unun PDKA’na (Prodüktif Demirbaş Kıymet Artışı), %76.31’inin süt üretimine ve %2.7’sinin gübre üretimine ait olduğu belirlenmiş ve 1 kg süt üretim maliyeti 0.407 TL olarak hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıca yapılan path analizi sonucunda süt üretiminde meydana gelen varyasyonun %61.49’unun kesif ve kaba yem kullanımında meydana gelen değişmelerle açıklanabildiği belirlenmiştir. Path analizi ile süt üretiminde kullanılan yem maddelerinin süt üretimi üzerindeki doğrudan ve dolaylı etkileri incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak süt verimi üzerine en fazla etkiyi silajlık mısır (%20) ve arpanın (%14) yaptığı belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTÜRK, D., BAYRAMOĞLU, Z., SAVRAN, F., TATLIDİL, F. F. (2010). Süt üretimini etkileyen faktörler ve süt üretim maliyeti: Çanakkale İli biga İlçesi örneği. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 329–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/273271

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Anonymous: Agricultural and Economic Report 20032006. Union of Turkish Agricultural Societies, Pub. Ankara, (265), 421, 2008
  2. Anonymous: General Agricultural Census. State Institute of Statistics Publication, Ankara, 2001
  3. Anonymous: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Unpublished records, 2009
  4. Khral T, Kasnakoğlu H, Tatlıdil FF, Fidan H: Cost calculation and database guide for agricultural products. Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, 37, 97-106, 1999
  5. Greene W: Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, 5th, New York University, ISBN: 0-13-110849-2, 15, 2003
  6. Gujarati DN: Basic Econometric (Translator: Ümit Şenesen ve Gülay Günlük Şenesen). Literature Publications, ISBN: 975-7860-99-9, Istanbul, (33): 212-215, 1999
  7. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ: Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company. San Francisco, 1969
  8. Singh DP: Correlations in Indian colza. Indian J Agr Sci, 44 (3): 142-144, 1974
  9. Schuster W, Sra SS: Entragsaufbau verschiedener Winter und Sommerrapssorten auf unterschiedlichen Standorten. Z Acker Pflanzenbau, 148-366, 1979
  10. İlker E: Arpa melezlerinde verim ve verim özellikleri arasindaki ilişkiler. Ege Univ Zir Fak Derg, 43 (3): 1-11, 2006
  11. İşci Ö, Takma Ç, Akbaş Y: Investigation with path analysis of the factors effective on 305 days milk productivity of Holstein Friesian
  12. National Science Congress of Zootechnics, 1-4 September Isparta, (1): 578-584, 2004
  13. Aygün H, Algan N: Bazi fizyolojik yazlik kanola genotiplerinde verim ve verim komponentleri arasindaki ilişkiler. Ege Univ Zir Fak Derg, 2, 69-76, 2004
  14. Kayghshz Z, Saraçlı S, Dokuzlar KU: Investigation of the factors effecting the development level of provinces with path analysis and cluster analysis. VII. National Symposium of Econometrics and Statistics, 26-27 May 2005, Istanbul, 2005
  15. Deliktaş E, Usta S, Bozkurt S, Helvach B: Factors effecting fertility rate in provinces in Turkey: Path analysis approach. Ege Ekonomik Bakiş, 8 (2): 877-895, 2008
  16. Anonymous: Path Analysis. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu /courses/ed230b/notes/handout7.pdf,2009a, Accesed: 28.08.2009
  17. Cuhung Li C: Path Analysis. The Bookwood Press, ISBN: 0-910286-41-8, USD, 101,1975
  18. Dewey DR, Lu KHA: Correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested. Wheatgrass Seed Production. Agron J, 51, 515-518, 1959
  19. Li CC: Path analysis-a primer. Box-Wood Pres, California, 1986
  20. Türkyhlmaz MK, Aral S: Aydin ili süt siğircilik işletmelerinde kaynak kullaniminda