SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 6

Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Doğal bitki florasında bulunan Çaşir (Prangos ferulacea) ve keçi dikeni (Astragalus gummifera) bitkilerinin yem değerlerinin belirlenmesi

Determination of the feed values of Çaşir (Prangos ferulacea) and goat’s thorn (Astragalus gummifera) located in natural plant flora of the Southeastern Anatolia region

SABRİ YURTSEVEN
Pages
909–915
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Current results show that the feed value of P. ferulacea is higher compared to A. gummifera but lower than feed value of alfalfa hay.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the nutritive value of some alternative forage in Turkey by using chemical composition and in vitro gas production kinetics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, casir (Prangos ferulacea) leaves, branch, corpus and goat’s thorn (Astragalus gummifera) spines, branch and corpus were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Current results show that the feed value of P. ferulacea is higher compared to A. gummifera but lower than feed value of alfalfa hay.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kimyasal bileşim · dal · ham protein

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the nutritive value of some alternative forage in Turkey by using chemical composition and in vitro gas production kinetics. In this study, casir (Prangos ferulacea) leaves, branch, corpus and goat&#8217;s thorn (Astragalus gummifera) spines, branch and corpus were used. The values of these forages were compared with alfalfa hay (AH=Medicago sativa). The crude protein content of AH was significantly higher than those of P. ferulacea leaves (P1), P. ferulacea branch (P2), P. ferulacea corpus (P3), A. gummifera spines (A1), A. gummifera branch (A2), A. gummifera corpus (A3) (P<0.01). The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content of P. ferulacea leaves was significantly higher than those of other forages (P2, P3, A1, A2, A3) (P<0.01). There were significant differences among P. ferulacea, A. gummifera and AH in terms of in vitro gas production kinetics as well as estimated parameters such as metabolizable energy (ME), net energy lactation (NEL) and organic matter digestibility (OMD). ME, NEL and OMD values of Prangos leaves were significantly higher than those of AH. The RFV of AH were significantly higher than those of P1, P2, P3 and A1, A2, A3 (P<0.001). Current results show that the feed value of P. ferulacea is higher compared to A. gummifera but lower than feed value of alfalfa hay.

Özet

Bu çalışmada in vitro gaz üretim tekniği kullanılarak ve kimyasal içeriğine gore Türkiye’deki bazı alternatif yem kaynaklarının besin değerlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada Çaşir (Prangos ferulacea) ve keçi dikeni (Astragalus gummifera) bitkilerinin yaprak, dal ve ana gövde kısımları kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen değerler yonca otu (Medicago sativa) ile kıyaslanmıştır. Yonca kuru otunun (YKO) protein değeri Prangos ferulacea yaprak (P1), dal (P2) ve gövde (P3) ile Astragalus gummifera yaprak (A1), dal (A2) ve gövde (A3) kısımlarından daha yüksek olmuştur (P<0.01). P1’in NDF içeriği diğer bitkilerden (P2, P3, A1, A2 ve A3) önemli düzeyde daha yüksek bulunmuştur (P<0.01). In vitro gaz üretim değerleri ve hesaplanan metabolik enerji (ME), net enerji laktasyon (NEL) ve organik madde sindirilebilirliği (OMD) bitkiler arasında önemli farklılıklar göstermiştir. Prangos yapraklarının ME, NEL ve OMS değerlerinin yoncaya gore daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (P<0.001). Elde edilen sonuçlara gore Prangos ferulacea’nın yem değerinin Astragalus gummifera bitkisine göre daha iyi; yonca otuna kıyasla daha düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURTSEVEN, S. (2011). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Doğal bitki florasında bulunan Çaşir (Prangos ferulacea) ve keçi dikeni (Astragalus gummifera) bitkilerinin yem değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 6, 909–915. https://ajindex.com/articles/273205

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Niknam V, Lisar YS: Chemical composition of Astragalus: Carbo-hydrates and mucilage content. Pak J Bot, 36 (2): 381-388, 2004
  2. Coskun B, Gülsen N, Umurcalılar HD: The nutritive value of Prangos ferulacea. Grass Forage Sci, 59, 15-19, 2004
  3. Menke KH, Steingass H: Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Devel, 28, 7-55, 1988
  4. Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ: Realtionships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 111, 57-71, 2004
  5. AOAC: Officinal Methods of Analysis. 16th ed., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD 1998
  6. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA: Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74, 3583-3597, 1991
  7. Jeranyama P, Garcia AD: Understanding relative feed value (rfv) and relative forage quality (RFQ). http://agbiopubs.sdstate.edu/articles/ExEx8149.pdf, Accessed: 01.01.2009. 8. Ørskov Er, Mcdonald I: The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci Camb, 92, 499-503, 1979
  8. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W: The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci Camb, 93, 217-222, 1979
  9. SPSS: Statistical package of social sciences (Base 15.0) Spss Inc. Chicago 2006
  10. Norton BW: The nutritive value of tree legumes. From http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Pub/licat/Gutt-shel/x5556e0j.htm, pp.1-10 Accessed: 23.10.2003
  11. Wettstein HR, Machmuller A, Kreuzer M: Effects of raw and modified canola lecithins compared to canola oil, canola seed and soy lecithin on ruminal fermentation measured with rumen simulation technique. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 85, 153-169, 2000
  12. Calabro S, Infascelli F, Bovera F, Moniello G, Piccolo V: In vitro degradability of three forages: Fermentation kinetics and gas production of NDF and neutral detergent-soluble fraction of forages. J Sci Food Agric, 82, 222-229, 2001
  13. Doane PH, Schofield P, Pell AN: Neutral detergent fiber disappearance and gas and volatile fatty acid production during the in vitro fermentation of six forages. J Anim Sci, 75, 3342-3352, 1997
  14. Abdulrazak S