Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Bıldırcın rasyonlarına propiyotik ve humik asitin yalnız ve kombine katılmasının besi performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi

The Effect of Single and Combined Use of probiotic and humatein Quail (Coturnix coturnix Japonica) diet on fatttening performance and carcass parameters

Pages
1–5
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that the use of probiotic andhumic acid alone and combination has no additional effect on quail performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This experiment was carried out to determine the both single and combined effects of humates (Farmagulator XPTM) andprobiotics (BiosaccTM) in quail diets on fattening performance and carcass yields.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 300 one-day old Japanese Quails(Coturnix coturnix japonica) were used in this experiment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that the use of probiotic andhumic acid alone and combination has no additional effect on quail performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kümes hayvanları beslenmesi · probiyotikler · et hayvanları

Abstract

This experiment was carried out to determine the both single and combined effects of humates (Farmagulator XPTM) andprobiotics (BiosaccTM) in quail diets on fattening performance and carcass yields. A total of 300 one-day old Japanese Quails(Coturnix coturnix japonica) were used in this experiment. Animals were divided into one control group and three treatmentgroups containing 75 birds each. Each group was further divided into three replicates containing 25 birds each. The experimental period lasted for 35 days. The control group was fed with unsupplemented basal diets. The rations of treatment groups weresupplemented with 1 g/kg Farmagulator XPTM (Group H), 0.5 g/kg BiosaccTM (Group B) and 1 g/kg Farmagulator XPTM + 0.5 g/kg BiosaccTM combination (Group H+B), respectively. At the end of the study there were no statistically signifi cant differences among the groups in terms of body weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and carcass yield (P>0.05). But, bodyweight scores were found higher at the 4th and 5th weeks in the group H (P<0.05). It is concluded that the use of probiotic andhumic acid alone and combination has no additional effect on quail performance.

Özet

Bu araştırma, bıldırcın rasyonlarına ilave edilen humik asid (Farmagulator XP™) ve probiyotik (Biosacc™)’ın, yalnız veyakombine kullanımının besi performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmada toplam 300adet günlük Japon bıldırcın (Coturnix coturnix japonica) civcivi kullanılmıştır. Her grupta 75 civciv bulunan bir kontrol ve 3deneme grubu oluşturulmuştur. Gruplar kendi aralarında 3’erli alt gruba ayrılmıştır. Deneme beş hafta sürdürülmüştür. Kontrol grubu basal rasyonla beslenmiştir. Deneme grubu rasyonlarına sırasıyla 1 g/kg Farmagulator XP™ (Grup H), 0.5 g/kg Biosacc™ (Grup B) ve 1 g/kg Farmagulator XP™ + 0.5 g/kg Biosacc™ (Grup H+B) kombinasyonu ilave edilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda, canlı ağırlık artışı, yem tüketimi, yemden yararlanma oranı ve karkas verimleri bakımından istatistik açıdan önemli bir fark görülmemiştir (P>0.05). Bununla beraber canlı ağırlık değişimleri 4 ve 5. haftalarda Grup H’ de daha yüksek bulunmuştur (P<0.05). Sonuç olarak,probiyotik ile humik asitin yalnız ve birlikte kullanılmasının performansta ilave bir artışa yol açmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, T., ELMALI, D. A., KAYA, İ., SARI, M., KAYA, Ö. (2011). Bıldırcın rasyonlarına propiyotik ve humik asitin yalnız ve kombine katılmasının besi performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/273108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Anonim: The effects of humates on crops. htt p://www. organicapproacn.com/humates.htm, 2002. Accessed: 30.10.2009. 2.Faust RH: Humic acids- humates. htt p://www.agrihelp.com/ humates.htm, 1996. Accessed: 22.09.2009. 3.Levinsky BV: All about humate effects and benefi ts. htt p://www. umic.com./, 1997. Accessed: 22.09.2009. 4.Spark KM, Wells JD, Johnson BB: The interaction of a humic acid with heavy metals. Aust J Soil Res, 35, 89-101, 1997. 5.Fedorova LA, Dudinov VM, Levinsky BV: Experimental and commercial application of potassium/sodium humate (Gumat) at State Production Company Fowl Farm Severy. htt p://www.alt. irkutsk.ru/humate/result_e.html, 1998. Accessed: 30.01.2010. 6.Onifade AA, Odunsi AA, Babatunde GM, Olorede BR, Muma E: Comparison of the supplemental eff ects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antibiotics in low-protein and high-fiber diets fed to broiler chickens. Arch Tierernahr, 52, 29-39, 1999. 7.Bailey CA, White KE, Donke SL: Evaluation of menefee humate on performance of broilers. Poult Sci, 75 (Suppl): 84 (Abstr), 1996. 8.Eren M, Deniz G, Gezen ŞŞ, Türkmen İİ: Broiler yemlerine katılan humatların besi performansı, serum mineral konsantrasyonu ve kemik külü üzerine etkileri. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 47, 275-317, 2000. 9.Karaoğlu M, Macit M, Esenbuga N, Durdag H, Turgut L, Bilgin ÖC: Effect of supplemental humate at different levels on the growth performance, slaughter and carcass traits of broilers. Int J Poult Sci, 3 (6): 406-410, 2004. 10.Kocabağlı N, Alp M, Acar N, Kahraman R: The effects of dietary humate supplementataion on broiler growth and carcass yield. Poultry Sci, 81, 227-230, 2002. 11.Dierck NA: Biotechnology aids to improve feed and feed digestion: Enzymes and fermentation. Arch Anim Nutr Berl, 39, 241-261, 1989. 12. Yeo J, Kim K: Effect of feeding diets containing an antibioti c, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poult Sci, 76, 381-385, 1997. 13. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S: Probiotics in poultry; modes of action. World’s Poult Sci J, 53, 351-368, 1997. 14. Thayer RH, Jackson CD: Improving phytate phosphorus uti lization by poultry with live yeast culture. Okla Agric Exp Stn Res Rep, MP-103, 131-139, 1975. 15. Tonkinson LV, Gleaves EW, Dunkelgod KE, Thayer RH, Sirny RJ, Morrison RD: Fatty acid digestibility in laying hens fed yeast culture. Poult Sci, 44, 159-164, 1965. 16. Savage TF, Nakaue HS, Holmes ZA: Effects of feeding a live yeast culture on market tur