Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Farklı yetiştirme metotlarının etlik piliçlerde besi performansı, kesim ve Karkas özellikleri ile bazı et kalite parametreleri üzerine etkisi

The effects of different breeding methods on fattening performance and parameters related to slaughter, carcass and some meat quality in broiler chickens

Pages
283–289
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that the L*, b* and C* values pertaining to breast meat and the L*, a*, b* and C* values pertaining to chicken drumsticks displayed statistically significant differences (P<0.05, P<0.01) between the trial groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was aimed at the comparison of floor-based growth (FBG) and caged-based growth (CBG) systems in broiler production for growth performance and parameters related to slaughter, carcass and meat quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ninety one-day-old male Ross-308 chicks constituted the material of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that the L*, b* and C* values pertaining to breast meat and the L*, a*, b* and C* values pertaining to chicken drumsticks displayed statistically significant differences (P<0.05, P<0.01) between the trial groups.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2046 Verileri
⚙️Variables:yemden yararlanma · besi · büyüme oranı

Abstract

The present study was aimed at the comparison of floor-based growth (FBG) and caged-based growth (CBG) systems in broiler production for growth performance and parameters related to slaughter, carcass and meat quality. Ninety one-day-old male Ross-308 chicks constituted the material of the study. It was determined that, in Groups FBG and CBG, the differences between body weight and cumulative body weight values were statistically very significant (P<0.01). The final body weights measured at the end of the trial and the mean body weight gain values in Groups FBG and CBG were determined as 2530 g - 2046 g and 2389.16 g - 1904.77 g, respectively. The end-trial final feed conversion rates of Groups FBG and CBG were determined as 1.82 and 1.88, respectively, and it was ascertained that the difference between the values of the two groups was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). While the hot and cold dressing percentages and the neck, wing, drumstick and tail percentages did not statistically differ between Groups FBG and CBG (P>0.05), values pertaining to breast meat displayed significant differences (P<0.05). It was determined that the L*, b* and C* values pertaining to breast meat and the L*, a*, b* and C* values pertaining to chicken drumsticks displayed statistically significant differences (P<0.05, P<0.01) between the trial groups.

Özet

Bu araştırma altlıklı yer sistemi (FBG) ve kafeste (CBG) yapılan etlik piliç yetiştiriciliğinin besi performansı, kesim, karkas ve bazı karkas kalite parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Hayvan materyali olarak 90 adet bir günlük Ross-308 erkek broyler civciv kullanılmıştır. FBG ve CBG gruplarında canlı ağırlık ve kümülatif canlı ağırlık değerleri arasındaki farklılığın istatistiksel olarak çok önemli (P 0.05) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. FBG ve CBG gruplarında sıcak ve soğuk karkas randımanı ile boyun, kanat, but ve kuyruk oranlarına ait değerler arasında istatistiksel olarak farklılığın olmadığı (P>0.05), göğüs oranına ait değerler bakımından ise önemli (P<0.05) farklılıkların olduğu belirlenmiştir. Göğüs etinden elde edilen L*, b* ve C* değerlerinin ve but etinden elde edilen L*, a*, b* ve C* değerleri bakımından deneme grupları arasında önemli farklılıkların olduğu (P<0.05, P<0.01) tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

LAÇİN, E., ÇOBAN, Ö., AKSU, M. İ., SABUNCUOĞLU, N., DAS, H. (2013). Farklı yetiştirme metotlarının etlik piliçlerde besi performansı, kesim ve Karkas özellikleri ile bazı et kalite parametreleri üzerine etkisi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 283–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/272923

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Abrahamsson P, Tauson R: Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens. Effects on production, egg quality, health and bird location in three hybrids. Acta Agricult Scand, Section A, 45, 191-203, 1995
  2. Rodriguez B, Valdivie M, Dieppa O: Body damages associated with high stocking densities of broiler chickens in cages. Cuban J Agr Sci, 39, 61-66, 2005
  3. Santoso U: Effects of house type and early feed restriction on performance and fat deposition in unsexed broilers. J Ilmu Ternak Dan Vet, 7, 84-89, 2002
  4. Swain BK, Sundaram RNS, Barbuddhe SB, Nirmale AV: Influence of cage and deep litter rearing systems on the performance of broilers. Indian J Anim Sci, 79, 467-469, 2002
  5. Wang SU, Zhang X, Huang BL, Sheng F, Li K, Ren S: Comparsion among differenet broiler-rearing technical crafts. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 13, 96-98, 1997
  6. Awoniyi TAM: The effect of housing on layer-chicken’s productivity in the 3-tier cage. Int J Poult Sci, 2, 438-441, 2003
  7. Fouad MA, Abdel AH, Razek AH, Badawy EM: Broilers welfare and economics under two management alternatives on commercial scale. Int J Poult Sci, 7, 1167–1173, 2008
  8. Duncan IJH: The pros and cons of cages. World’s Poult Sci J, 57, 381-390, 2001
  9. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis. 15 ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, (Washington, D.C.), 1990
  10. Huff W: Evaluation of tibial dyschondroplasia during aflatoxicosis and feed restriction in young broiler chickens. Poult Sci, 59, 991-993, 1980
  11. Yalcin S, Ozkan S, Acıkgoz Z, Ozkan K: Effect of dietary methionine on performance, carcass characteristics and breast meat composition of heterozygous naked neck (Na/Na+) birds under spring and summer conditions. Br Poult Sci, 40, 688-694, 1999
  12. Mathes M, Möllerherm L, Krell U: Geflügel. (Deutscher Fachverlag GmbH, Frankfurt), 1997
  13. Pingel H, Wicke M, Lengerken GV: Gewinnung und Qualitöt von Geglügelfleisch. In, Branscheid W, Honikel KO, Lengerken GV, Troeger K (Eds): Qualitöt von Fleisch und Fleischwaren. pp. 301-334, Deutscher Fachverlag, Germany. 1998
  14. Barbut S: Poultry Products Processing. An Industry Guide. CRC Press, USA, 2002
  15. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences: SPSS for Windows release 10.01. SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1996
  16. Hypes WA, Carpenter GH, Peterson RA, Jones WT: Productive performance of conventional floor-reared broilers high density cage brooded broilers. J Appl Poult Res, 3, 238-243, 1994
  17. Turkyilm