SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 0

Seroprevalance of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in Kars region

Kars yöresindeki sığırlarda Anaplasma marginale seroprevalansı

Gürbüz GÖKÇE
ALİ HAYDAR KIRMIZIGÜL
YAKUP YILDIRIM
EKİN EMRE ERKILIÇ
Pages
187–190
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The C-ELISA results showed that 52.1% of serum samples were positive for antibodies to Anaplasma marginale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to investigate the seroprevalance of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in Kars region of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, blood serum samples were collected from 188 cattle from 5 different districts of Kars region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The C-ELISA results showed that 52.1% of serum samples were positive for antibodies to Anaplasma marginale.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the seroprevalance of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in Kars region of Turkey. For this purpose, blood serum samples were collected from 188 cattle from 5 different districts of Kars region. A commerically available Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were used for determine antibodies to Anaplasma marginale. The C-ELISA results showed that 52.1% of serum samples were positive for antibodies to Anaplasma marginale. The results of this study show that Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle is common in Kars region of Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışma Türkiye’nin Kars yöresindeki sığırlarda Anaplasma marginale seroprevalansının araştırılması amacıyla yapıldı. Bu amaçla Kars yöresindeki 5 farklı odaktan 188 sığırdan kan serumu örnekleri alındı. Anaplasma marginale’ye karşı oluşan antikorların saptanması için ticari Kompetetive-ELISA (C-ELISA) testi kullanıldı. C-ELISA sonuçları serum örneklerinin %52.1’inde Anaplasma marginale’ye karşı pozitif antikor bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları Türkiye’nin Kars yöresindeki sığırlarda Anaplasma marginale enfeksiyonunun yaygın olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, G., KIRMIZIGÜL, A. H., YILDIRIM, Y., ERKILIÇ, E. E. (2013). Seroprevalance of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in Kars region. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 0, 187–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/272913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kuttler KL: Anaplasma ınfections in wild and domestic ruminants: A review. J Wildlife Dis, 20, 12-20, 1984
  2. Kocan KM, Fuente J, Blouin EF, Coetzee: The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Vet Parasitol, 167, 95-107, 2010
  3. Bundza A, Samagh BS: Acute Anaplasmosis in imported cattle. Can Vet J, 23, 337-339, 1982
  4. Potgieter FT, Van Rensburg LJ: The persistence of colostral Anaplasma antibodies and incidence of in utero transmission of Anaplasma infections in calves under laboratory conditions. Onderstepoort J Vet Res, 54, 557- 560, 1987
  5. OIE: Bovine anaplasmosis, OIE terrestrial manual, p1-12,2012.http:// www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.04.01_ bovine anaplasmosis.pdf, Accessed: 23.01.2013
  6. Kocan KM, Blouin EF, Barbet AF: Anaplasmosis: Control, past, present, and future. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 916, 501-509, 2000
  7. Arslan MÖ, Umur Ş, Aydın L: Kars yöresi sığırlarında lxodidae türlerinin yaygınlığı. Türkiye Parazitol Derg 23, 331-335, 1999
  8. Rodgers SJ, Welsh RD, Stebbins ME: Seroprevalance of bovine anaplasmosis in Oklahoma from 1977 to 1991. J Vet Invest, 6, 200-206, 1994. 9. de la Fuente J, Lutz H, Meli ML, Hofman-Lehmann R, Shkap V, Molad T, Mangold AJ, Almazan C, Naranjo V, Gortazar C, Torina A, Karacappa S, Garcia-Perez AL, Barral M, Oporto B, Ceci L, Carelli G, Blouin EF, Kocan KM: Genetic diversity of Anaplasma species major surface proteins and implications for anaplasmosis serodiagnosis and vaccine development. Anim Health Res Rev, 6, 75-89, 2005
  9. Cringoli G, Otranto D, Testini G, Buono V, Di Giulio G, Traversa D, Lia R, Rinaldi L, Veneziano V, Puccini V: Epidemiology of bovine tickborne diseases in southern Italy. Vet Res, 33, 421-426, 2002
  10. Tembue AA, Silva JB, Silva FJM, Pires MS, Baldani CD, Soares CO, Massard CL, Fonseca AH: Seroprevalance of IgG antibodies against Anaplasma marginale in cattle from South Mozambique. Rev Bras Vet Jaboticabal, 20 (4): 318-324, 2001
  11. Birdane FM, Sevinç F, Derinbay Ö: Anaplasma margınale infections in dairy cattle: Clinical disease wıth high seroprevalence. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy, 50, 467-470, 2006
  12. Çakmak A: Ankara yöresinde bir sığır sürüsünde hemoparazitlerin insidensinin araştırılması. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 37, 633-645, 1990
  13. Göksu K: Yurdumuzun çeşitli bölgelerinde sığırlarda Piroplasmida enfeksiyonları (Piroplasmosis, Babesiosis, Theileriosis) ve Anaplasmosis’in yayılış durumları. Türk Vet Hek Dern Derg, 40, 29-39, 1970
  14. Sevinç F: Sığırlarda A