Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 5

Sağlıklı ve ishalli pet hayvanlarda Termofilik Campylobacter spp.’nin üç kültür metodu ile izolasyonu ve izolatların multipleks polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu m(PZR) ile identifikasyonu

Recovery of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in healthy and diarrhoeic pets by three culture methods and identification of the isolates by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR)

Pages
735–741
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall prevalence of Campylobacter species was found to be 40.0% and 26.7% in dogs and cats, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the determination of prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter species in dogs and cats with and without diarrhoea using 3 diferent cultural methods was aimed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, rectal swabs were collected from 120 dogs and 15 cats and 14 of them (12 dogs and 2 cats) were taken from diarrhoeic animals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall prevalence of Campylobacter species was found to be 40.0% and 26.7% in dogs and cats, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the determination of prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter species in dogs and cats with and without diarrhoea using 3 diferent cultural methods was aimed. For this purpose, rectal swabs were collected from 120 dogs and 15 cats and 14 of them (12 dogs and 2 cats) were taken from diarrhoeic animals. The isolation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. was conducted by direct plating onto modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) supplemented with CCDA (cefoperazone, amphotericin B) or CAT (cefoperazone, amphotericin and teicoplanin) for all samples and membrane filtration method onto Mueller-Hinton Agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood for samples from diarrhoeic pets and identification of isolates was performed using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR). The overall prevalence of Campylobacter species was found to be 40.0% and 26.7% in dogs and cats, respectively. Campylobacter jejuni was the most frequent bacterium isolated from 36 dogs and 4 cats. C. upsaliensis, C. coli and C. lari were isolated from 10 dogs and 1 cat, 5 dogs and 2 healthy dogs respectively. For the isolation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp., whilst the method using CAT as selective supplement being more sensitive in dogs, the membrane filtration appeared as the most suitable method in diarrhoeic dogs. These results showed the occurrence of a relatively high carriage of Campylobacter spp., particularly in healthy dogs that may constitute a non negligible risk for public health.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sağlıklı ve ishalli kedi ve köpeklerde 3 farklı kültür metodu kullanılarak termofilik Campylobacter türlerinin prevalansının belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Bu amaçla, 120 köpek, 15 kediden rektal svap örneği toplandı ve bunların 14’ü (12 köpek ve 2 kedi) ishalli hayvanlardan alındı. Termofilik Campylobacter spp.’nin izolasyonunda, tüm örnekler için CCDA (cefoperazone, amphotericin B) ya da CAT suplement (cefoperazone, amphotericin and teicoplanin) ilave edilmiş modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA)’a (sefoperazon, amfoterisin B) direkt ekim, ishalli hayvanlardan alınan örnekler için de %5 defibrine koyun kanı ilave edilmiş Mueller- Hinton Agar üzerine membran fltrasyon yöntemi kullanıldı. İzolatların identifikasyonu multipleks polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (mPZR) ile gerçekleştirildi. Campylobacter türlerinin köpek ve kedilerde genel prevalansı sırasıyla %40.0 ve %26.7 olarak bulundu. Campylobacter jejuni en sık rastlanan tür olup 36 köpek ve 4 kediden izole edildi. Ayrıca, 10 köpek ve 1 kediden C. upsaliensis, 5 köpekten C. coli ve 2 sağlıklı köpekten C. lari izole edildi. Termofilik Campylobacter spp. izolasyonu için CAT selektif suplementin kullanıldığı metot köpeklerde daha duyarlı iken ishalli köpeklerde membran filtrasyonun en uygun metot olduğu görüldü. Bu sonuçlar, özellikle sağlıklı köpeklerde oldukça yüksek oranlarda bulunan Campylobacter spp. taşıyıcılığının halk sağlığı için göz ardı edilemez risk oluşturduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABAY, S., AYDIN, F., HIZLISOY, H., GÜNEŞ, V. (2014). Sağlıklı ve ishalli pet hayvanlarda Termofilik Campylobacter spp.’nin üç kültür metodu ile izolasyonu ve izolatların multipleks polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu m(PZR) ile identifikasyonu. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 5, 735–741. https://ajindex.com/articles/272763

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Foster G, Holm es B, Steigerwalt AG, Lawson PA, Thorne P, Byrer DE, Ross H, Xerry J, Thompson PM, Collins MD: Campylobacter insulaenigrae sp. nov., isolated from marine mammals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 54, 2369-2373, 2004
  2. Humphrey T, O’brien S, Madsen M: Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective. Int J Food Microbiol, 117 (3): 237-257, 2007
  3. On SLW: Taxonomy of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria: C urrent status, future prospects and immediate concerns. J Appl Microbiol, 90, 1-15, 2001
  4. Friedman C, Neimann J, Wegener H, Tauxe R: Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations. In, Nachamkin I, Blaser M.J (Ed): Campylobacter. 2 nd ed., 121-138. Washington DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology Press, 2000
  5. Skirrow MB: Epidemiology of Campylobacter enteritis. Int J Food Microbiol, 12 (1): 9-16, 1991
  6. Skirrow MB: Diseases due to Campylobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria. J Comp Pathol, 111 (2): 113-149, 1994
  7. Alterkuse SF, Hunt JM, Tollefson LK, Madden JM: Food and animal sources of human Campylobacter jejuni infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 204 (1): 57-61, 1994
  8. Aydin F, Atabay HI, Akan M: The isolation and characterisation of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni from domestic geese (Anser anser). J Appl Microbiol, 90 (4): 637-642, 2001
  9. Aydin F, Gumussoy KS, Ica T, Sumerkan B, Esel D, Akan M, Ozdemir A: The prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in various sources in Kayseri, Turkey, and molecular analysis of isolated strains by PCR-RFLP. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 31 (1): 13-19, 2007
  10. Butzler PJ: Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity. Clin Microbiol Infect, 10 (10): 868-876, 2004
  11. Newell DG, Fearnley C: Sources of Campylobacter colonisation in broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol, 69 (8): 4343-4351, 2003
  12. Arikoglu C, Aydin F: The prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in domestic and wild animal in Kars district. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 3 (2): 173-180, 1997
  13. Studahl A, Andersen Y: Risk factors for indigenous Campylobacter infection: A Swedish case-control study. Epidemiol Infect, 125 (2): 269-275, 2000
  14. Alterkuse SF, Stern NJ, Fields PI, Swerdlow DL: Campylobacter jejuni - An emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerg Infect Dis, 5 (1): 28-35, 1999
  15. Peterson M: Campylobacter jejuni enteritis asociated with consumption of raw milk. J Environ Health, 65 (9): 20-21, 2003
  16. Andrzejewska M, Szczepańska