Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Ankara keçisi teke spermasının dondurulmasında üç farklı kryoprotektanın karşılaştırılması

The comparison of three different cryoprotectants in cryopreservation of Angora goat semen

Pages
613–619
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, no advantages were found in using EG or DMSO to replace G for freezing of Angora goat sperm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to evaluate glycerol (G), ethylene glycol (EG) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) which were used two different doses on in vitro semen parameters, antioxidant enzymes activities and DNA damage after the freeze-thaw process in Angora goat semen.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Semen samples from 5 mature Angora goats were used in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, no advantages were found in using EG or DMSO to replace G for freezing of Angora goat sperm.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate glycerol (G), ethylene glycol (EG) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) which were used two different doses on in vitro semen parameters, antioxidant enzymes activities and DNA damage after the freeze-thaw process in Angora goat semen. Semen samples from 5 mature Angora goats were used in this study. A total number of 40 ejaculates were collected twice a week from the goats using an artificial vagina and the semen pooled to minimize individual variation. Each pooled ejaculate was split into 6 equal aliquots and diluted with tris base extenders supplemented with two different doses of cryoprotectants (G 3%, 6%; EG 3%, 6%; DMSO 3%, 6%). G 3% and 6% was added as a cryoprotectant had better CASA motility (P<0.01) and progressive motility (P<0.001) values when compared to EG and DMSO groups. On the other hand, EG 6% showed the best values of preserved membrane integrity (P<0.01). The evaluation of CASA sperm motions parameters, adverse effects were procured in the groups with DMSO groups when compared to the other groups (P<0.05; P<0.001). G 6% group was the greatest VAP, VSL and VCL values than the other groups (P<0.05; P<0.001). DNA damage was not affected by supplemented different doses of cryoprotectants as well as antioxidant activity (P>0.05). In conclusion, no advantages were found in using EG or DMSO to replace G for freezing of Angora goat sperm.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın konusu, iki farklı dozlarda kullanılan gliserol (G), etilen glikol (EG) ve dimethil sulfoksidin (DMSO) Ankara keçisi teke spermasının dondurma-çözdürme sonrasındaki in vitro sperma parametrelerinde, antioksidan enzim aktivitelerinde ve DNA hasarındaki etkilerini değerlendirmekti. Çalışmada 5 yetişkin Ankara keçisinden (3 ve 4 yaşlı) spermalar kullanıldı. Haftada iki kez suni vajen kullanılarak alınan 40 ejakülat kullanıldı ve bireysel farkları azaltmak için spermalar birleştirildi. Her birleştirilen sperma 6 eşit kısma bölündü ve içerisinde iki farklı dozda kryoprotektan (G %3, %6; EG %3, %6; DMSO %3, %6) katılmış tris sulandırıcısıyla sulandırıldı. Kriyoprotektan olarak G’ün %3 ve %6 oranında eklenmesi EG ve DMSO gruplarıyla kıyaslandığında en iyi CASA motilitesi (P 0.05). Sonuçta, Ankara keçisi teke spermalarının dondurulmasında G yerine EG ve DMSO’nun kullanılmasının avantajı bulunmadı.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKLEBLEBİCİ, S., TUNCER, P. B., TAŞDEMİR, U., ÖZGÜRTAŞ, T., DURMAZ, E., BÜYÜKLEBLEBİCİ, O. (2014). Ankara keçisi teke spermasının dondurulmasında üç farklı kryoprotektanın karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 613–619. https://ajindex.com/articles/272672

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Purdy PH: A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Rum Res, 63, 215-222, 2006
  2. Evans G, Maxwell WMC: Handling and examination semen. In, Maxwell WMC (Eds): Salamon’s Artificial Insemination of Sheep and Goat. 93-106, Sydney, Butterworths, 1987
  3. Polge C, Smith AU, Parkes AS: Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration in low temperatures. Nature, 164, 666-668, 1949
  4. Fiser PS, Fairfull RW: The effect of glycerol releated osmotic changes on post-thaw motility and acrosomal integrity of ram spermatozoa. Cryobiology, 26, 64-69, 1989
  5. Rasul Z, Ahmad N, Anzar M: Antagonist effect of DMSO on the Cryo- protection ability of glycerol during cryopreservation on buffalo sperm. Theriogenology, 68, 813-819, 2007
  6. Swelum AA, Mansour HA, Elsayed AA, Amer AH: Comparing ethylene glycol with glycerol for cryopreservation of buffalo bull semen in egg-yolk containing extenders. Theriogenology, 76 (5): 833-842, 2011
  7. Alvarenga MA, Papa FO, Landim-Alvarenga FC, Medeiros ASL: Amides as cryoprotectants for freezing stallion semen. Anim Reprod Sci, 89, 105-113, 2005
  8. Arifiantini RI, Purwantara B, Yusuf TL, Sajuthi D: Effect of different cryoprotective agents on skun milk and dimitropoulus extender for stallion semen cryopreservation. J Indonesian Trop Anim Agric, 35, 68- 74, 2010
  9. Holt WV: Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Anim Reprod Sci, 62, 3-22, 2000
  10. Lovelock JE, Bishop MWH: Prevention of freezing damage to living cells by dimethylsulphoxide. Nature, 183, 1394-1394, 1959
  11. Kundu CN, Chakraborty J, Dutta P, Bhattacharyya D, Ghosh A, Majumder GC: Development of a simple sperm cryopreservation model using a chemically defined medium and goat cauda epididymal spermatozoa. Cryobiology, 40, 117-125, 2000
  12. Kundu CN, Chakraborty J, Dutta P, Bhattacharyya D, Ghosh A, Majumder GC: Effect of dextrans on cryopreservation of goat cauda epididymal spermatozoa using a chemically defined medium. Reproduction, 123, 907-913, 2002
  13. Farshad A, Khalili B, Fazeli P: The effect of different concentrations of glycerol and DMSO on viability of Markhoz goat spermatozoa during different freezing temperatures steps. Pak J Biol Sci, 12 (3): 239-245, 2009
  14. Taşdemir U, Tuncer PB, Büyükleblebici S, Özgürtaş T, Durmaz E, Büyükleblebici O: Effects of various antioxidants on cryopreserved bull sperm quality. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 20 (2): 253-258, 2014. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2013.9964 15. Bucak MN, Sarıözkan S, Tuncer PB, Sakin F, Ateşşah