Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Türkiye'nin Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde Boğaların Brusellozisi Üzerine Serolojik Araştırma ve Kullanılan Testlerin Karşılaştırılması

The Serological Study on Brucellosis of the Bulls and Comparison of the used Tests in the Northeast Anatolia Region of Turkey

Pages
127–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In animals, venereal transmission that is thought to play the least role in transmission of disease considering founction of nonspecific barrier of vagina to infection is an issue that should be taken into consideration besides ingestion of infected tissues or body fluids, contact with mucous membranes, direct inoculation, and fomites that are the most common ways in transmission of bovine brucellosis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The goal of this study was to use Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Serum Agglutination Test (SAT) and Complement Fixation Test (CFT) to determine the prevalence of brucellosis in bulls raised in Turkey's Northeast Anatolian Region (the provinces of Kars, Ardahan and Iğdır), where bovine brucellosis is endemic and compare these tests.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study material consisted of blood samples from bulls raised on cattle farms operated by families using extensive farming methods in the provinces of Kars, Ardahan and Iğdır, where animals exhibited no clinical symptoms of disease.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In animals, venereal transmission that is thought to play the least role in transmission of disease considering founction of nonspecific barrier of vagina to infection is an issue that should be taken into consideration besides ingestion of infected tissues or body fluids, contact with mucous membranes, direct inoculation, and fomites that are the most common ways in transmission of bovine brucellosis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The goal of this study was to use Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Serum Agglutination Test (SAT) and Complement Fixation Test (CFT) to determine the prevalence of brucellosis in bulls raised in Turkey's Northeast Anatolian Region (the provinces of Kars, Ardahan and Iğdır), where bovine brucellosis is endemic and compare these tests. The study material consisted of blood samples from bulls raised on cattle farms operated by families using extensive farming methods in the provinces of Kars, Ardahan and Iğdır, where animals exhibited no clinical symptoms of disease. This is the first study to use sampling to determine the prevalence of brucellosis in bulls. Of 227 bulls that were evaluated in the study, 21 (9.25%) were found positive for RBPT, 19 (8.37%) were positive for SAT and 20 (8.81%) were positive for CFT. In animals, venereal transmission that is thought to play the least role in transmission of disease considering founction of nonspecific barrier of vagina to infection is an issue that should be taken into consideration besides ingestion of infected tissues or body fluids, contact with mucous membranes, direct inoculation, and fomites that are the most common ways in transmission of bovine brucellosis

Özet

Bu çalışmada ineklerde brusellozisin endemik olduğu Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde (Kars, Ardahan, Iğdır illeri) yetiştirilen boğalarda brusellozis prevalansının Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Serum Agglutination Test (SAT) ve Complement Fixation Test (CFT) ile belirlenmesi ve bu testlerin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın materyalini Kars, Ardahan ve Iğdır illerinde ailesel düzeyde ve ekstansif olarak yetiştirilen sığır işletmelerinde bulunan hastalığa ilişkin herhangi bir klinik belirti göstermeyen boğaların kan örnekleri oluşturdu. Örneklem alanında boğalarda brusellozis prevalansının belirlenmesine yönelik ilk olan bu araştırmada değerlendirilen 227 boğaya ait kan serumlarının 21'i (%9.25) RBPT, 19'u (%8.37) SAT ve 20'si (%8.81) CFT ile pozitif olarak saptanmıştır. Hayvanlarda, sığır brusellozisinin bulaşmasında en çok karşılaşılan doku ve vücut sıvılarının sindirimi, mukoz membranlarla temas, direkt inokülasyon ve fomitlerin yanı sıra vajinanın infeksiyonlara nonspesifik bariyer oluşturması göz önünde bulundurularak hastalığın aktarımında daha az rol oynadığı düşünülen veneral bulaşma da dikkate alınması gereken bir husustur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEBİ, Ö., BÜYÜK, F., SAĞLAM, A. G., ÇELİK, E., AKÇA, D., OTLU, S., ŞAHİN, M. (2016). Türkiye'nin Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde Boğaların Brusellozisi Üzerine Serolojik Araştırma ve Kullanılan Testlerin Karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 127–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/272373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Rhyan JC, Holland SD, Gidlewski T, Saari DA, Jensen AE, Ewalt D, Hennager SG, Olsen SC, Cheville NF: Seminal vesicuitis and orchitis caused by Brucella abortus biovar 1 in young bison bulls from South Dakota. J Vet Diagn Invest, 9, 368-374, 1997. DOI: 10.1177/104063879700900405 Carvalho Neta, AV, Mol JP, Xavier MN, Paixao TA, Lage AP, Santos RL: Pathogenesis of bovine brucellosis. Vet J, 184, 146-155, 2010. DOI: 1016/j.tvjl.2009.04.010 İyisan AS, Akmaz Ö, Düzgün SG, Ersoy Y, Eskiizmirliler S, Güler L, Gündüz K, Işık N, İçyerioğlu AK, Kalender H, Karaman Z, Küçükayan U, Özcan C, Seyitoğlu Ş, Tuna İ, Tunca T, Üstünakın K, Yurtalan S: Türkiye'de sığır ve koyunlarda brusellozisin seroepidemiyolojisi. Pendik Vet Mikrobiyol Derg, 31, 21-75, 2000. Otlu S: Brucellosis in animals. Turkiye Klinikleri J Inf Dis-Special Topics,, 99-106, 2012.
  2. Romero C, Gamazo C, Pardo M, Lo'pezgon I: Specific detection of Brucella DNA by PCR. J Clin Mic, 33, 615-617, 1995.
  3. Erdenebaatar J, Sugar S, Yondondorj A, Nagabayashi T, Syuto B, Watarai M, Makino S, Shirahata T: Serological differentiation Brucella- vaccinated and ınfected domesticated animals by the Agar Gel Immunodiffusion Test using Brucella polysaccharide in Mongolia. JVMS,, 839-841, 2002. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.64.839 Celebi O, Atabay HI: Seroepidemiological investigation of brucellosis in sheep abortions in Kars, Turkey. Trop Anim Health Prod, 41, 115-119, DOI: 10.1007/s11250-008-9165-y Patel PA, Modi LC, Patel SP, Jadhav KM, Modi F: Seroprevalence of brucellosis in buffalo bulls used for natural service in Mehsana milk area, Gujarat. JIVA, 9 (2): 64-65, 2011.
  4. Sylla S, Sidimé Y, Sun Y, Doumbouya S, Cong Y: Seroprevalence investigation of bovine brucellosis in Macenta and Yomou, Guinea. Trop Anim Health Prod, 46, 1185-1191, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-014- 2 Genç O, Büyüktanır Ö, Yurdusev N: Development of qualitative and quantitative ELISA models for bovine brucellosis diagnosis. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16, 287-291, 2010. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2009.692 Pehlivanoğlu F, Öztürk D, Günlü S, Güldalı Y, Türütoğlu H: Prevalence of brucellosis in dairy herds with abortion problems. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 17, 615-620, 2011. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2011.4358 Alton GG, Jones ML, Angus RD, Verger JM: Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory. INRA Publications, Paris, 1988. Minas A: Control and eradication of brucellosis in small ruminants. Small Rumin Res, 62, 101-107, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.031 Arda M, Minbay A, Leloğlu N, A