Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Endüstriyel Ticari Şekerlerin Farklı Şerbet Seviyeleri İle Beslenen Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Kolonilerinden Üretilmiş Katkılı ve Saf Balların Biyokimyasal Özellikler Yönünden Karşılaştırılması

Comparing Biochemical Properties of Pure and Adulterated Honeys Produced By Feeding Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies with Different Levels of Industrial Commercial Sugars

Pages
259–268
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The values of biochemical properties found in the present study are important references to be used for revision of national and international standards

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, 100 pure and adulterated honey samples produced by feeding colonies with different levels (5, 20 and 100 L/colony) of various commercial industrial sugar syrups such as High Fructose Corn Syrup 85 (HFCS-85), High Fructose Corn Syrup 55 (HFCS-55), Glucose Monohydrate Sugar (GMS), Bee Feeding Syrup (BFS) and Sucrose Syrup (SS) were evaluated in terms of sugar ingredients, physicochemical, mineral matter, vitamin and enzyme contents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Proline, electrical conductivity, free acidity, vitamin, mineral and enzyme content of honey were significantly affected by sugar origin and syrup levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The values of biochemical properties found in the present study are important references to be used for revision of national and international standards
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the present study, 100 pure and adulterated honey samples produced by feeding colonies with different levels (5, 20 and 100 L/colony) of various commercial industrial sugar syrups such as High Fructose Corn Syrup 85 (HFCS-85), High Fructose Corn Syrup 55 (HFCS-55), Glucose Monohydrate Sugar (GMS), Bee Feeding Syrup (BFS) and Sucrose Syrup (SS) were evaluated in terms of sugar ingredients, physicochemical, mineral matter, vitamin and enzyme contents. Proline, electrical conductivity, free acidity, vitamin, mineral and enzyme content of honey were significantly affected by sugar origin and syrup levels. Fructose and glucose content of honey were not reliable criteria for distinguishing adulterated honey obtained by overfeeding honey bees (100 L/colony syrup) with sugar having balanced monosaccharide fraction. For pure blossom honey having EC value below 0.20 mS/cm should be evaluated as indirect adulterated with commercial industrial sugars originating from both C3 and C4 plants. In addition, proline content of pure blossom honey below 300 mg/kg might be an indicator for overfeeding honey bee colonies with HFCS-85 and SS. It is clear that the important biochemical and biological degradation occurred in honey when the colonies overfed with industrial sugars syrup during the main nectar flow. The values of biochemical properties found in the present study are important references to be used for revision of national and international standards

Özet

Bu çalışmada, endüstriyel mısırdan üretilen ticari High Fructose Corn Syrup 85 (HFCS-85), High Fructose Corn Syrup 55 (HFCS-55) ve arı yemi (BFS) şurupları ile glukoz monohydrate (GMS) ve sukroz (SS) şekerlerinin 5, 20 ve 100 litre/koloni şerbet seviyeleri ile üretilmiş hileli ve saf (PBH) 100 bal örneğinin biyokimyasal özellikleri değerlendirilmiştir. 100 bal örneği su, fruktoz, glukoz, F/G, F+G, Glukoz/Su, maltoz, laktoz, sukroz, kül, serbest asitlik, viskozite, hydroxymethyfurfural (HMF), diyastaz, invertaz, ?-glukosidaz, glukoz oksidaz, proline, elektriki iletkenlik, Na, K, K/Na, vitamin B5 ve vitamin C yönünden karşılaştırılmıştır. Laktoz, maltoz ve glukosidaz enzimi dışındaki biyokimyasal özellikleri şeker çeşidi ve şerbet seviyesine göre önemli (P<0,001) farklılık göstermişlerdir. Arılar saf glukozmonohidrat şekerinden yararlanamamış fakat sukroz şekerini aşırı düzeyde severek tüketmişlerdir. Şeker içeriğinde monosakkarit yapıdaki fruktoz miktarı arttığında arı bunu izomerize edememiştir. Koloniye verilen şerbet miktarı arttıkça arılar daha fazla enzim üretememişlerdir. Şerbet miktarı arttıkça balın protein, enzim, vitamin, mineral madde ve şeker yapısı gibi çok önemli düzeyde biyokimyasal değişim ve biyolojik kayıp meydana gelmiştir. Prolin, asitlik, iletkenlik ve K/Na oranı aşırı besleme ile üretilen hileli balları tanımlamada önemli özelliklerdir. Biyokimyasal özelliklerin belirlenen değerleri mevcut ulusal ve uluslararası standartların düzenlenmesi için önemli referanslardır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, A., GARİPOĞLU, A. V., ÖNDER, H., BIYIK, S., KOCAOKUTGEN, H., EKİNCİ, D. (2017). Endüstriyel Ticari Şekerlerin Farklı Şerbet Seviyeleri İle Beslenen Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Kolonilerinden Üretilmiş Katkılı ve Saf Balların Biyokimyasal Özellikler Yönünden Karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 259–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/272289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Anklam E: A review of the analytical methods to determine the geographical and botanical origin of honey. Food Chem, 63, 549-562, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00057-0 2. Codex Alimentarius Commission: Codex Standard for honey, CODEX STAN 12-1981; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization. Rev.1, Rev. 2, Rome, Italy, 2001. 3. Guler A, Bakan A, Nisbet C, Yavuz O: Determination of important biochemical properties of honey to discriminate pure and adulterated honey with sucrose syrup. Food Chem, 105, 1119-1125, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.02.024 4. Ruoff K, Luginbühl W, Kilchenmann V, Bosset JO, Ohe KVD, Ohe WVD, Amado R: Authentication of the botanical origin of honey using profiles of classical measurands and discriminant analysis. Apidologie, 38, 438-452, 2007. DOI: 10.1021/jf060838r 5. White JWJR: Methods for determining carbohydrates, hydroxymethylfurfural and proline in honey: collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem, 62, 509-514, 1979. 6. Ruiz-Matute AI, Soria AC, Martinez-Castro I, Sanz ML: A new methodology based on GC-MC to detect honey adulteration with commercial syrups. J Agric Food Chem, 55, 7264-7269, 2007. DOI: 10.1021/ jf070559j 7. Ruiz-Matute AI, Weiss M, Sammatora D, Finely J, Sanz ML: Carbohydrate composition of high-fructose corn syrups (HFCS) used for bee feeding: Effect on honey composition. J Agric Food Chem, 58, 7317- 7322, 2010. DOI: 10.1021/jf100758x 8. Guler A, Kocaokutgen H, Garipoglu AV, Onder H, Ekinci D, Biyik S: Detection of adulterated honey produced by honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies fed with different levels of commercial industrial sugar (C3 and C4 plants) syrups by the carbon isotope ratio analysis. Food Chem, 155, 155-160, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.033 9. Sammataro D, Weiss M: Comparison of productivity of colonies of honey bee, Apis mellifera, supplemented with sucrose or high fructose corn syrup. J Insect Sci, 13, 1-13, 2013. DOI: 10.1673/031.013.1901 10. Leblebici MJ, Leblebici F: Şeker ve Tatlandırıcılar. Sugar Company, NO: 1, 2011. 11. Farr SA, Yamada KA, Butterfield DA, Abdul HM, Xu L, Miller NE, Banks WA, Morley JE: Obesity and hypertriglyceridemia produce cognitive impairment. Endocrinology, 149, 2628-2636, 2008. DOI: 10.1210/ en.2007-1722 12. Weiss M: Supplemental carbohydrates in apiculture: Effects upon honey bee (Apis mellifera) health and productivity. MSc Thesis, University of Arizona, Tuscon, 2009. 13. Ross AP, Bartness TJ, Mi