Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The Private Sector Incentive Factors in Public-Private Partnership Model: Case of City Hospitals

Kamu-Özel İşbirliği Modelinde Özel Sektör Teşvik Faktörleri: Şehir Hastaneleri Örneği

Pages
386–401
Publication Date
2020-01-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, incentives are analyzed under the headings of sharing of risks, “usage fee” and “investment fee” payments, convergence new investment areas, giving the right of building to private sector entrepreneur, providing treasury guarantee for financing, exception of some taxes and duties, guarantees given to private sector entrepreneurs and operation of commercial service areas by private sector entrepreneurs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, it is common practice to provide various incentives to private sector entrepreneurs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These incentives may vary according to PPP implementing country, sector, PPP sub-model and PPP project.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, incentives are analyzed under the headings of sharing of risks, “usage fee” and “investment fee” payments, convergence new investment areas, giving the right of building to private sector entrepreneur, providing treasury guarantee for financing, exception of some taxes and duties, guarantees given to private sector entrepreneurs and operation of commercial service areas by private sector entrepreneurs.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kamu Özel İşbirliği (KÖİ) · Şehir Hastaneleri · Sağlık Hizmetleri

Abstract

In the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, it is common practice to provide various incentives to private sector entrepreneurs. These incentives may vary according to PPP implementing country, sector, PPP sub-model and PPP project. Incentive factors in PPP on the one hand, it contributes to increasing the motivation and on the other hand, making PPP an attractive investment alternative. In city hospitals built under the PPP model, incentives also play an important role in increasing the interest of private sector entrepreneurs in the projects and in the realization of the projects. In this study, PPP incentive applications are examined in the case of city hospitals. In this context, first, the conceptual framework of PPP and PPP incentives is discussed. Then, in city hospital projects, the incentive applications arising from the structure of the PPP or specifically provided to city hospitals are evaluated. In this context, incentives are analyzed under the headings of sharing of risks, “usage fee” and “investment fee” payments, convergence new investment areas, giving the right of building to private sector entrepreneur, providing treasury guarantee for financing, exception of some taxes and duties, guarantees given to private sector entrepreneurs and operation of commercial service areas by private sector entrepreneurs.

Özet

Kamu özel işbirliği (KÖİ) modeli ile kamu hizmetlerinin etkili, verimli ve kesintisiz bir şekilde sunulmasında rol oynayan iki ana aktörden biri özel sektör girişimcisidir. Asıl amacı kar elde etmek olan özel sektör girişimcileri KÖİ projesine katılmak ve projede kalmak için bir takım motivasyonlara ve garantilere gereksinim duyarlar. KÖİ projelerinde özel sektör girişimcilerine sağlanan teşvik faktörleri, bir yandan motivasyonunun arttırılmasına diğer yandan KÖİ'nin cazip bir yatırım alternatifi olmasına katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu araştırmada, şehir hastaneleri örneğinde KÖİ teşvik uygulamaları incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, öncelikle KÖİ ve KÖİ teşviklerinin kavramsal çerçevesi ele alınmaktadır. Daha sonra, şehir hastaneleri projelerinde KÖİ'nin yapısından kaynaklanan veya şehir hastanelerine özel olarak sağlanan teşvik uygulamaları analiz edilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, teşvikler risklerin paylaşımı, kullanım bedeli ve yatırım bedeli ödemeleri, yeni yatırım alanlarına kavuşma, özel sektör girişimcisine üst hakkı verilmesi, finansmana hazine garantisi sağlanması, bazı vergi ve harçlara istisna getirilmesi, özel sektör girişimcilerine verilen garantiler, ticari hizmet alanlarının özel sektör girişimcisi tarafından işletilmesi başlıkları altında incelenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, Y. (2020). The Private Sector Incentive Factors in Public-Private Partnership Model: Case of City Hospitals. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 386–401. https://ajindex.com/articles/2720

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aktaş Y., (2017). Şehir hastanelerinde garanti nedeniyle devletten para çıkmayacak. 17.11.2017, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/saglik/sehir-hastanelerinde-garanti-nedeniyle-devletten-para-cikmayacak/968025, (20.11.2018)
  2. An X., Li, H., Wang, L., Wang, Z., Ding, J. ve Cao, Y. (2018). Compensation mechanism for urban water environment treatment PPP project in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201. 246-253 Bilkent Ankara Entegre Sağlık Hizmetleri Yatırım ve İşletme A.Ş, (2014). Bilkent Ankara Entegre Sağlık Kampüsü Projesi Çevresel ve Sosyal Etki Değerlendirmesi Raporu Teknik Olmayan Özet. http://www. bilkentsaglik.com/20.01.pdf. (16.01.2016)
  3. Bing, L, Akintoye, A., Edwards, P.J. ve Hardcastle, C., (2005). The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management. 23. 459-471
  4. Bloomfield, P., (2006). The Challenging Business of Long-Term Public – Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience. Public Administration Review. March/ April. 400-411
  5. Burger, P., Tyson, J., Karpowicz, I. ve Delgado Coelho M.(2009). The Effects of the Financial Crisis on Public-Private Partnerships. IMF Working Paper WP/09/144. July 2009
  6. Cavelty, M. D. ve Suter, M. (2009). Public–Private Partnerships are no silver bullet: An expanded governance model for Critical Infrastructure Protection. International Journal of Critical Infastructure Protection. Volume: 2 Issue: 4 Carpintero, S., (2015). Public-Private Partnership Projects in Canada: A Case Study Approach. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering. Vol:9. No:5. 1591-1594
  7. Chena, M. S., Lu H.F. ve Lin H.W. (2006). Are the nonprofit organizations suitable to engage in BOT or BLT scheme? A feasible analysis for the relationship of private and nonprofit sectors. International Journal of Project Management. 24 Clerck, D. D., ve Demeulemeester, E. (2016). An ex ante bidding model to assess the incentive creation capability of a public–private partnership pipeline. International Journal of Project Management. Volume 34, Issue 1, January. 117-131
  8. Conde, A. B. A., Brown, C. ve Suarez, J.R. (2007). Public private partnerships: Incentives, risk transfer and real options. Review of Financial Economics. vol. 16. issue 4. (2007). 335-349
  9. Çakır, M. K., (2016). 6428 Sayılı Kanuna Göre Kamu Özel İşbirliği Kavramı ve Yeni Bir Model: Yap kirala Devret, Ankara.
  10. Seçkin Yayınları Emek, U., (2009). Türkiye’de Altyapı Hizmetlerinin Özel Sektöre Gördürülmesi: Neden, Ne zaman, Nasıl?