SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Experimental Determination of Sound Transmission Loss of Some Wood Species

Bazı Ağaç Türlerinin Ses İletim Kaybının Deneysel Olarak Belirlenmesi

Vedat ÇAVUŞ
Murat KARA
Pages
190–199
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Highlights: It is important to determine the frequency-related acoustic performance parameters of the wood material and to its relationship with density.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of study: To determine the sound transmission losses of 16 different wood species with the different density in the range of 100-1000 Hz frequencies, and the relationship between density and transmission loss was.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: In this study sound transmission loss values of Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), Beech (Betula pendula), Black pine (Pinus nigra), Black poplar (Populus nigra), Canadian poplar (Populus x euramaricana), Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), Cypress (Cupressus sempervirens), Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lips,) Eucalyptus C. (E, camaldulensis Dehnh), Eucalyptus G. (Eucalyptus grandis), Juniper (Juniperus excelsa), Plane (Platanus orientalis L.), Scotch pine (Pinus sylvetris L), Turkish Red pine (Pinus brutia Ten) and White Oak (Quercus alba) wood specimens were determined by using the impedance tube kit.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Highlights: It is important to determine the frequency-related acoustic performance parameters of the wood material and to its relationship with density.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akustik Özellikler · Ses İletim Kaybı · Yoğunluk

Abstract

Aim of study: To determine the sound transmission losses of 16 different wood species with the different density in the range of 100-1000 Hz frequencies, and the relationship between density and transmission loss was. Material and methods: In this study sound transmission loss values of Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), Beech (Betula pendula), Black pine (Pinus nigra), Black poplar (Populus nigra), Canadian poplar (Populus x euramaricana), Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), Cypress (Cupressus sempervirens), Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lips,) Eucalyptus C. (E, camaldulensis Dehnh), Eucalyptus G. (Eucalyptus grandis), Juniper (Juniperus excelsa), Plane (Platanus orientalis L.), Scotch pine (Pinus sylvetris L), Turkish Red pine (Pinus brutia Ten) and White Oak (Quercus alba) wood specimens were determined by using the impedance tube kit. Main results: Sound transmission loss is observed in lower density wood material species with the increasing frequency. However, a clear relationship has not been established between the mean sound transmission loss and density. Highlights: It is important to determine the frequency-related acoustic performance parameters of the wood material and to its relationship with density.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı: farklı yoğunluğa sahip 16 farklı ağaç türünün 100-1000 Hz frekans aralığında ses iletim kaybı değerleri ile yoğunluk arasındaki ilişkinin belirlemektir. Materyal ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada Dişbudak (Fraxinus excelsior), Akasya (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), Huş (Betula pendula), Karaçam (Pinus nigra), Kara kavak (Populus nigra), Kanada kavağı (Populus x euramaricana), Kestane (Castanea sativa) Mill.), Selvi (Cupressus sempervirens), Doğu kayını (Fagus orientalis Lips,) Okaliptüs C. (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh), Okaliptüs G. (Eucalyptus grandis), Ardıç (Juniperus excelsa), Doğu Çınarı (Platanus orientalis L.), Sarıçam (Pinus sylvetris L), Türk Kızılçamı (Pinus brutia Ten.) ve Beyaz Meşe (Quercus alba) odunlarının ses iletim kaybı değerleri empedans tüp düzeneğinde belirlenmiştir. Temel sonuçlar: Frekans arttığında, daha düşük yoğunluğa sahip ağaç malzeme türlerinde yüksek ses iletim kaybı gözlendiğini belirlenmiştir. Ancak, ortalama ses iletim kaybı ile yoğunluk arasında net bir ilişki belirlenmemiştir. Araştırma vurguları: ağaç malzemenin frekansa bağlı akustik performans parametrelerinin belirlenmesi ve yoğunluk ile ilişkisinin tespit edilmesi önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAVUŞ, V., KARA, M. (2020). Experimental Determination of Sound Transmission Loss of Some Wood Species. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 190–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/271871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. ASTM Standard E1050-12. (2012). Standard test method for impedance and absorption of acoustical materials using a tube, two microphones and a digital frequency analysis system, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, ASTM E2611-17. (2017). Standard Test Method for Normal Incidence Determination of Porous Material Acoustical Properties Based on the Transfer Matrix Method 1; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, ASTM C423-09. (2009). Standard Test Method for Sound Absorption and Sound Absorption Coefficients by the Reverberation Room Method, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, ASTM E2249-19. (2003). Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Transmission Loss of Building Partitions and Elements Using Sound Intensity, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, Bal, B. C. & Bektaş, İ. (2018). Odunun yoğunluğu ile mekanik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Mobilya ve Ahşap Malzeme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 51-6.
  2. Berkel, A., (1970).
  3. Ağaç malzeme teknolojisi, İstanbul üniversitesi, Orman fakültesi yayınları, İstanbul.
  4. Bies, D. A. & Hansen, C. H. (2009). Engineering noise control: Theory and practice, fourth edition. In Engineering Noise Control: Theory and Practice, (4th ed.). Spon Press/Taylor & Francis. Bucur, V. (2006). Acoustics of wood, 2nd ed. Springer Series in Wood Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany. Chauan, S., Entwistle, K.M. & Walker, J.C.F. (2005). Differences in acoustic velocity by resonance and transit-time methods in an anisotropic laminated wood medium. Holzforschung, 59,428-434.
  5. Chang, L., W. U. & Zhihui, W.U. (2011). Study on sound absorption performance of extruded tubular particleboard used in indoor wooden products, Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 35(2), 56-60.
  6. Crocker, M. J. (2007). Handbook of noise and vibration control. New Jersey, John Wiley. Çavuş, V. (2019). Mühendislik Ürünü Ağaç Malzemelerde Yükselen Trend; Çapraz Tabakalanmış Kereste. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 (2), 560-569.
  7. Davern, W. A. (1977). Perforated facings backed with porous materials as sound absorbers an experimental study. Applied Acoustics, 10, 85-122.
  8. Fukuta, S., Nishizawa, M. & Takasu, Y. (2012). Sound absorption and form retention of newly developed heat-insulating/acoustic material. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 70, 697–704 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-012-0607-x
  9. Godshall, D. & Davis, J.H. (1969). Acoustical Absorption Properties of Wood-Base Panel Mater