Journals / Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A Comparative Study For Green Management Practices in Rome and Alanya Restaurants From Managerial Perspectives

Pages
3–11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research results indicate that water-saving, energy saving practices, selective collection of solid residues, and reduction in the use of environmentally dangerous products are important for both Italian and Turkish restaurant managers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to find an answer for the question that is whether there are differences between Rome and Alanya restaurants’ green management practices from managerial perspectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total 181 responses, 98 from Turkish and 83 from Italian, were obtained in January and March 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Research results indicate that water-saving, energy saving practices, selective collection of solid residues, and reduction in the use of environmentally dangerous products are important for both Italian and Turkish restaurant managers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to find an answer for the question that is whether there are differences between Rome and Alanya restaurants’ green management practices from managerial perspectives. So, the study focuses on measuring and comparing the perceptions of Italian and Turkish restaurant managers with green management practices in their own restaurants. Because of their tourism potential and being one of the most important destinations of the country, Rome and Alanya were selected as research areas in the study. Restaurants in the centre of both cities were included in the research. Restaurants located in the city centre were visited and explained the voluntary participation and the aim of the research. In total 181 responses, 98 from Turkish and 83 from Italian, were obtained in January and March 2015. Research results indicate that water-saving, energy saving practices, selective collection of solid residues, and reduction in the use of environmentally dangerous products are important for both Italian and Turkish restaurant managers. But t-test results do show that there are some outstanding differences between the priority preferences of Italian and Turkish restaurant managers for green management practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, H., NEBİOĞLU, O., DEMİRAĞ, M. D. (2015). A Comparative Study For Green Management Practices in Rome and Alanya Restaurants From Managerial Perspectives. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 3–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/271339

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alonso-Almeida, M.M. (2009). The corporate boards in the global hotel chains: analysis from a gender perspective, Tourist Studies and Perspectives, 18 (2), 112-125.
  2. Alonso-Almeida, M.M. (2013). Environmental management in tourism: students’ perspectives and managerial practice in restaurants from a gender perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 60, 201-207.
  3. Armstrong, E.K. (2003). Applications of role playing in tourism management reaching: evaluation of a learning method, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 2 (1), 5-16.
  4. Barutcu, S., Dogan, H. and Unguren, E. (2011). Tourists’ perceptions and satisfaction of shopping in Alanya region: a comparative analysis of different nationalities, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1049-1059.
  5. Chen, C.T, Cheng, C.C, and Hsu, F.S. (2013). GRSERV scale: an effective tool for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality in green restaurants. Total Quality Management, 1-13.
  6. Choi, G., and Parsa, H.G. (2006). Green practices II: Measuring restaurant managers’ psychological attributes and their willingness to charge for the green practices, Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 9, 41-63.
  7. Choi, G., Parsa, H.G., Siagala, M. and Putrevu, S. (2009). Consumers’ environmental concerns and behaviors in the lodging industry: A comparison between Greece and the United States, Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, 10 (2), 93-112.
  8. Chou, C.J., Chen, K.S. and Wang, Y.Y. (2012), Green practices in the restaurant industry from an innovation adoption perspective: Evidence from Taiwan, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 703-711.
  9. Dewald, B., Bruin, B.J. Jang, Y.J. (2014), US consumer attitudes towards “green” restaurants, Anatolia: International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 25 (2), 171-180.
  10. DiPietro, R.B., Gregory, S. and Jackson, A. (2013a), Going Green in Quick-Service Restaurants: Customer Perceptions and Intensions, International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration, 14, 139-156.
  11. DiPietro, R.B., Yang, C. and Partlow, C. (2013b), Green practices in upscale foodservice operations: customer perceptions and purchase intentions, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15 (5), 779- 796. Dogan, H., Unguren, E. and Barutcu, S. (2012), Russian and German tourist potential and satisfaction in sustainable competitive advantage of Alanya destination, Tourismos: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 7