Journals / Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

(The Effect of Cameron-Quinn Organizational Culture Types on Innovation in Hotel Enterprises)

Otel İşletmelerinde Cameron-Quinn Örgüt Kültürü Tiplerinin Yenilikçiliğe Etkisi

Pages
476–492
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research; it was found that adhocracy and clan culture types have a meaningful and positive relationship with innovation, hierarchy organizational culture type has a meaningful and negative relationship with innovation and the market organizational culture type has no significant relationship with the innovation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hotel enterprises in the tourism sector are businesses that are trying to maintain their presence in an intense competitive environment both locally and globally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research aims to reveal the relationship between Cameron-Quinn organizational culture types and innovativeness in hotel businesses. 405 questionnaires were reached, in the research conducted in 53 four and five star hotel enterprises which located within the Muğla province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research; it was found that adhocracy and clan culture types have a meaningful and positive relationship with innovation, hierarchy organizational culture type has a meaningful and negative relationship with innovation and the market organizational culture type has no significant relationship with the innovation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Hotel enterprises in the tourism sector are businesses that are trying to maintain their presence in an intense competitive environment both locally and globally. One of the factors that hotel enterprises can achieve success is become different. Being different is possible with innovations those made by enterprises. This research aims to reveal the relationship between Cameron-Quinn organizational culture types and innovativeness in hotel businesses. 405 questionnaires were reached, in the research conducted in 53 four and five star hotel enterprises which located within the Muğla province. It was tried to determine the types of organizational culture perceived by the employees and it was tried to reveal the relationship between these organizational culture types and innovativeness of hotel with the obtained data. Reliability and validity analyzes were conducted in the analysis of the data, factor analysis was carried out to determine the organizational culture types and multiple regression analysis was applied to determine the effect of organizational culture types to innovation. As a result of the research; it was found that adhocracy and clan culture types have a meaningful and positive relationship with innovation, hierarchy organizational culture type has a meaningful and negative relationship with innovation and the market organizational culture type has no significant relationship with the innovation.

Özet

Turizm sektörü içerisinde yer alan otel işletmeleri hem yerel hem de küresel olarak yoğun bir rekabet ortamında varlıklarının devam ettirmeye çalışan işletmelerdir. Bu yoğun rekabet içerisinde otel işletmelerinin başarısını sağlayabilecek unsurlardan bir taneside diğer işletmelerden farklılaşmaktır. Farklı olabilmek ise işletmelerin yaptığı yenilikler ile mümkün olabilmektedir. Bu araştırma otel işletmelerindeki Cameron-Quinn örgüt kültürü tipleri ile yenilikçilik ilişkisini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Muğla ili sınırları içinde yer alan 53 adet dört ve beş yıldızlı otel işletmesinde gerçekleştirilen araştırmada 405 adet ankete ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler ile otel çalışanları tarafından algılanan örgüt kültürü tiplerinin belirlenmesi ve bu örgüt kültürü tipleri ile otelin yenilikçilik performansı arasındaki ilişki ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik analizleri yapılmış, örgüt kültürü tiplerinin belirlenmesi için faktör analizi gerçekleştirilerek örgüt kültürü tiplerinin yeniliğe etkisini belirlemek amacıyla çoklu regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; adhokrasi ve klan kültür tiplerinin yenilikçilik ile anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişkisinin olduğu, hiyerarşi örgüt kültürü tipinin anlamlı ve negatif ilişkisinin olduğu ve pazar kültür tipinin ise anlamlı bir ilişkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, A., TOPALOĞLU, C. (2018). (The Effect of Cameron-Quinn Organizational Culture Types on Innovation in Hotel Enterprises). Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 476–492. https://ajindex.com/articles/271056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Abdi, K. and Senin, A. A. (2014). Investigation on The Impact of Organizational Culture on Organization Innovation. Journal of Management Policiesand Practices, 2 (2), 1-10
  2. Acar, A. Z. ve Acar, P. (2012). The effects of Organizational Culture and Innovativeness on Business Performance in Healthcare Industry. Procedia-Socialand Behavioral Sciences, 58 (2012), 683-692.
  3. Ağaoğlu, O. K., (1992). İşgücünü Verimli Kullanma Tekniklerinin Turizm Sektörüne Uygulanması. Ankara:
  4. Milli Prodüktivite Yayını. Ahmed, P. K., (1998). Culture and Climate For Innovation. European Journal Of Innovation Management, 1 (1), 30-43.
  5. Akman, G. and Yılmaz, C. (2008).
  6. Innovative Capability, Innovation Strategy and Market Orientation: An Empirical Analysis in Turkish Software Industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12 (1), 69-111.
  7. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: Spss Uygulamalı. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitapevi. Asraf, G., Kadir, S. A., Pihie, Z. A. L. and Rashid, A. M. (2014). The Mediator Role of Organizational Innovativeness Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. British Journal of Education, 2 (6), 30-54
  8. Aydıntan, B. ve Göksel, A. (2012). Cameron-Freeman-Quinn Örgüt Kültürü Tipolojileri Ekseninde Örgüt Kültürü Farklılaşma Dinamikleri. Niğde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 5 (2), 53-62.
  9. Becker, H. S. (1982). Culture: A Sociological View. The Yale Review, 71 (Summer), 513-528
  10. Berberoğlu, G., (2003).
  11. Yönetim Organizasyon, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  12. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik Araştırma Deseni Spss Uygulamaları ve Yorum, Ankara:
  13. Pegem Akademi, Calantone, R. J., Çavuşgil, S. T. and Zhao, Y., (2002).
  14. Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, (31), 515–524.
  15. Cameron, K. S., and Quinn, R. S., (2006). Diagnosing And Changing Organizational Culture Based On The Competing Values Framework. Revised Edition, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Campbell, C. R. (2004). A Longitudinal Study Of One Organization’s Culture: Do Values Endure? Mid-American Journal Of Business, 19 (2), 41-51.
  16. Cooper, R. G., (1999), From Experience: The Invisible Success Factors In Product Innovation. Journal Of Product Innovation Mnagement, 16 (2), 115-133.
  17. Daft, R. L. (1983). Organization Theory And Design. Minnesota: West Pub. Co. Damanpour, F. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The Dynamics of Th