Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2012 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Adaptation of astronomy attitude scale into Turkish: The validity and reliability analysis

Astronomi tutum ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Pages
116–127
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this study is to adapt AAS developed by Zeilik et al. (1999) into Turkish, and investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION Astronomy is one of the earliest sciences (Osborne, 1991; Pena & Quilez, 2001), and nowadays a strong emphasis has been placed on topics related to astronomy in science curriculum and standards (Kalkan & Kıroğlu, 2007; National Research Council [NRC], 1996) throughout the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Turkey, Turkish elementary science and technology curriculum was renewed in 2005 in accordance with the constructivist approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this study is to adapt AAS developed by Zeilik et al. (1999) into Turkish, and investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Astronomy is one of the earliest sciences (Osborne, 1991; Pena & Quilez, 2001), and nowadays a strong emphasis has been placed on topics related to astronomy in science curriculum and standards (Kalkan & Kıroğlu, 2007; National Research Council [NRC], 1996) throughout the world. In Turkey, Turkish elementary science and technology curriculum was renewed in 2005 in accordance with the constructivist approach. Astronomy concepts were included into the new science and technology curriculum. Astronomy related topics in the new K-12 science curriculum are: shape and structure of earth (4th grade), size and shape of sun, earth and moon – moon and earth motion – day and night cycle (5th grade), orbs, solar system and space probes (7th grade), and formation of universe and earth 8th grade) (Turkish Ministry of National Education [TMNE], 2004, 2005). In this new science and technology curriculum, it has been pointed out that it is important for students to gain a positive attitude toward astronomy. Moreover, since the universe is a natural laboratory for many scientific laws, students’ positive attitude toward astronomy is closely related to their attitude toward physics, chemistry, and biology (Tunca, 2000). According to Smith (1968), attitude is “the tendency which is attributed to the individual and which includes one’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviour about a psychological object” (cited in Kağıtçıbaşı, 2010, p. 110). Tezbaşaran (1997) defined attitude as the learned tendency to have a positive or negative reaction towards an object, situation, institution, concept or other people. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Most of the research studies conducted in Turkey regarding astronomy education were carried out to identify students’ understanding of astronomy (Bayraktar, 2009; Ekiz & Akbaş, 2005; Emrahoğlu & Öztürk, 2009; Kalkan, Ustabaş & Kalkan, 2007; Küçüközer, 2008; Orbay & Gökdere, 2006; Ünsal, Güneş & Ergin, 2001). In the literature no quantitative studies can be located that carried out to investigate students’ attitudes toward astronomy in Turkey. Not only in Turkey but also in the worldwide, there are a limited number of studies about students’ attitudes toward astronomy (De Roberts & Delanay, 1993; Zeilik, Bisard & Lee, 2002; Zeilik et al., 1997; Zeilik & Morris, 2003; Zeilik, Schau & Mattern, 1999). The Astronomy Attitude Scale (AAS) is developed by Zeilik and his colleagues in 1999, is the most well-known scale for measuring attitude toward astronomy. The purpose of this study is to adapt AAS developed by Zeilik et al. (1999) into Turkish, and investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Zeilik ve arkadaşları (1999) tarafından geliştirilen, “Astronomi Tutum Ölçeği (ATÖ)”ni Türkçe’ye uyarlamak ve ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerini yapmaktır. Araştırmaya Ankara Üniversitesi Astronomi Bölümü’nden 83 öğrenci ve üç farklı Eğitim Fakültesi’nden (Amasya, Gazi ve Kocaeli Üniversitesi) astronomi dersi almış olan 172 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmada ölçeğin dilsel eşdeğerliği incelendikten sonra geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Faktör analizi sonucunda, Türkçe’ye uyarlanan ölçeğin orijinal ölçekten farklı olarak iki boyutlu olduğu ve 15 maddeden oluştuğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı .80 olarak belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin iki faktörüne ait Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı ise .71 ve .77 dir. Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda elde edilen bulgular ATÖ’nün geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLİCİ, S. C., ARMAĞAN, F. Ö., KOZCU, N. Ç., YÜRÜK, N. (2012). Adaptation of astronomy attitude scale into Turkish: The validity and reliability analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 116–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/270622

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alpar, R. (2003). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemlere giriş (2. Baskı). Ankara:
  2. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Bayraktar, Ş. (2009). Pre-service primary teachers’ ideas about lunar phases. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2).12-23.
  3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K., & Long, S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162).
  5. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage. Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application and programing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (4. Baskı). Ankara:
  6. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö., Kahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
  7. Debaz, T. P. (1994). A meta-analysis of the relationship between students’ characteristics and achievement and attitudes towards science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Ohio. De Robertis, M.M., & Delanay, P.A. (1993). A survey of the attitudes of university students to astrology and astronomy. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 87(1), 34-50.
  8. Ekiz, D., & Akbaş, Y. (2005). İlköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin astronomi ile ilgili kavramları anlama düzeyi ve kavram yanılgıları. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 165, 61-78.
  9. Emrahoğlu, N., & Öztürk, A. (2009). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının astronomi kavramlarını anlama seviyelerinin ve kavram yanılgılarının incelenmesi üzerine boylamsal bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,18(1),165–180.
  10. Fidler, C.G. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers learning of astronomy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, New York. Hassard, D., & Dias, M. (2009). The art of teaching science. Newyork: Routledge, Taylor& Francis. Hoe, S.L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76-83.
  11. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in cov