Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey

Pages
162–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was concluded that the keywords did not give enough information about the studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the trend of studies in the laboratory and put the current situation in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data group of the research consists of thesis studies on laboratories in our country between 1999-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was concluded that the keywords did not give enough information about the studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study is to determine the trend of studies in the laboratory and put the current situation in Turkey. For this purpose, document analysis technique, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The data group of the research consists of thesis studies on laboratories in our country between 1999-2017. Theses in the fields of science, physics, chemistry, and biology have been determined and themes and sub-themes have been created through the keywords of these theses. Then, frequency tables were created according to the themes and sub-themes created. According to the findings obtained, it was seen that the traditional laboratory approach and inquiry-based laboratory approaches are compared in the studies. It was determined that the studies were done on physics subjects and it was determined that complementary measurement and evaluation studies performed for performance evaluation were used in very fewnumbers. In addition, it was concluded that the keywords did not give enough information about the studies. In this context, it can be suggested to examine the effectiveness of these approaches according to each other and experiment types by examining theapproaches in which students can be more active in laboratories.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENER, D., KÖKLÜ, N., YAMAÇ, R. Z., YALÇIN, S. (2020). Analysis of the Studies Done onLaboratories in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 162–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/270600

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Airasian, P. W. (2001). Assessment in the classroom a concise approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Akben, N. & Köseoğlu, F. (2010). Laboratory activity sample based on inquiry on the subject of elementary education fifth grade density. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences,5(3), 1281-1289.
  2. Alkan, F. & Koçak, C. (2015). Chemistry laboratory applications supported with simulations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (176), 970-976.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.566
  3. Antonio, V. V. (2018). Science laboratory interest and preferences of teacher education studies: Implications to science teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisiplinary Research, 6(3), 57-67.
  4. Aydın, M. (2010). The compare effect of using prediction-observe-explain method on students’ achievement in science and technology of remediation of misconceptions. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Zonguldak Kara Elmas University. Aydoğdu, B. & Ergin, Ö. (2010, November 11-13). Effects of different experimental techniques used in science and technologylesson on students' learning approaches.[Conference presentation]. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya. Aydoğdu, C. (2018). Historical development of laboratory in the elementary school science program in Turkey. Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology, Iowa: ISRES Publishing. Baysal, Y. E., Mutlu, F. & Kış, A. (2019). The effect of laboratory applications based on modern approaches on the attitudes of the students in turkey in laboratory courses: a meta-analysis study. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 19(3), 802-817.https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2019.19.49440-531395
  5. Bekiroğlu, F. O. (2004). How successful? classical and alternative measurement-evaluation methods and applications in physics.Ankara:
  6. Nobel Publications. Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B, Lundberg, B. & Tibell, L. (2003) Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment, International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351-372.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145738
  7. Brownell, H. & Wade, F. B. (1925). The teaching of science and the science teacher. New York: Century Company. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2011). Scientific research methods (8thed.), Ankara: Pegem Academy.https://doi.org/10.14527/9789