Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of STEM Project Based Learning on Self-Efficacy among High-School Physics Students

Pages
94–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, the study proposes a guideline for future research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PjBL) is increase effectiveness, create meaningful learning and influence student attitudes in future career pursuit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the effect of implementing STEM PjBL in terms of improving students’ skills in self-efficacy levels in physics mechanics at high school level has not been demonstrated as expected in the previous literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, the study proposes a guideline for future research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PjBL) is increase effectiveness, create meaningful learning and influence student attitudes in future career pursuit. There are several studies in the literature reporting different aspects of STEM into a PjBL pedagogy. However, the effect of implementing STEM PjBL in terms of improving students’ skills in self-efficacy levels in physics mechanics at high school level has not been demonstrated as expected in the previous literature. This study followed a quasi-experimental research method. Bandura’s social cognitive theory is used to assess and compare the effect of STEM PjBL with conventional teaching method on students’ selfefficacy level in learning physics among over 100 high school students. The result illustrated that STEM PjBL improve students’ self-efficacy to solve physics problem. Also, the study proposes a guideline for future research.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMSUDIN, M. A., JAMALI, S. M., ZAIN, A. N. M., EBRAHIM, N. A. (2020). The Effect of STEM Project Based Learning on Self-Efficacy among High-School Physics Students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 94–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/270586

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akhavan, Ale Ebrahim, Fetrati, & Pezeshkan. (2016). Major trends in knowledge management research: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1249-1264. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x Amoozegar, Khodabandelou, & Ale Ebrahim. (2018). Major trends in distance education research: A combination of bibliometric and thematic analyze. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 5(2), 5352-5359. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1239756 Bandura. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Bandura. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Bandura. (1989). Social cognitive theory, six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (Vol. 6, pp. 1-60):
  2. JAI Press,
  3. Greenwich. Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan. Bandura, Barbaranelli, Caprara, & Pastorelli. (2001). Self‐efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child development, 72(1), 187-206. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00273 Baran, & Maskan. (2010). The effect of project-based learning on pre-service physics teachers electrostatic achievements. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 243-257.
  4. Bardach, Gayer, Clinkinbeard, Zanjani, & Watkins. (2010). The malleability of possible selves and expectations regarding aging. Educational Gerontology, 36(5), 407-424. doi:10.1080/03601270903212393 Betz, & Hackett. (2006). Career self-efficacy theory: Back to the future. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 3-11. doi:10.1177/1069072705281347 Blenkinsop, McCrone, Wade, & Morris. (2006). How do young people make choices at 14 and 16. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/6449
  5. Blumenfeld, Soloway, Marx, Krajcik, Guzdial, & Palincsar. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 Bøe, Henriksen, Lyons, & Schreiner. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement‐related choices in late‐modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37-72. doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.549621 Britner, & Pajares. (2006). Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of research in science teaching, 43(5), 485-499. doi:10.1002/tea.20131 Cervantes. (2013). The impact of projec