SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The Evaluation of Public Private Partnership Models in Terms of Turkish Fiscal Policy

Kamu Özel İşbirliği Modellerinin Türk Maliye Politikası Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi

murat kürkcü
Hilal COŞKUN ÖNAL
Pages
1688–1708
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of the study is to perform a literature research of the PPP model as an alternative resource to realize today’s public investments and services, to analyze it with different dimensions and in this framework, to evaluate the effects of the aforementioned model on the Turkish public finance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Increasing needs of societies cause an increase in the services and infrastructure investments that the states have to fulfill.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Considering the public sector financing deficits, deficiencies in the public income structure and stabilization problems in developing countries; it is seen that the compensation of infrastructure investments solely by the public sector gets harder and harder.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of the study is to perform a literature research of the PPP model as an alternative resource to realize today’s public investments and services, to analyze it with different dimensions and in this framework, to evaluate the effects of the aforementioned model on the Turkish public finance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kamu Özel İşbirliği (KÖİ) · KOİ’lerin Avantajları · Maliye Politikası

Abstract

Increasing needs of societies cause an increase in the services and infrastructure investments that the states have to fulfill. Considering the public sector financing deficits, deficiencies in the public income structure and stabilization problems in developing countries; it is seen that the compensation of infrastructure investments solely by the public sector gets harder and harder. In this case, the administrations have begun to seek ways of cooperating with the private sector. Public Private Partnerships (PPP) comprise of applications aiming to create an alternative resource for the purpose of providing the services that the public administration intends to apply. The purpose of the study is to perform a literature research of the PPP model as an alternative resource to realize today’s public investments and services, to analyze it with different dimensions and in this framework, to evaluate the effects of the aforementioned model on the Turkish public finance.

Özet

Toplumların artan ihtiyaçları devletlerin yerine getirmesi gereken hizmetlerde ve altyapı yatırımlarında artışa neden olmaktadır. Gelişmekte olan ülkelerdeki kamu kesimi finansman açıkları, kamu gelir yapısındaki yetersizlikler ve istikrar sorunları göz önüne alındığında altyapı yatırımlarının tek başına kamu kesimi tarafından karşılanmasının zorlaştığı görülmektedir. Bu durumda idareler özel sektör ile işbirliği yollarına başvurmaya başlamıştır. Kamu Özel İşbirlikleri (KÖİ), kamu idaresinin uygulamayı düşündüğü hizmetleri sunmak amacıyla alternatif kaynak oluşturmaya dönük uygulamaları kapsamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı günümüzde kamu yatırım ve hizmetlerinin gerçekleştirilmesinde alternatif bir kaynak olarak KÖİ modelinin, literatür araştırmasını yaparak, farklı boyutlarıyla analiz etmek ve bu çerçevede söz konusu modelin Türk kamu maliyesine olan etkilerini değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

kürkcü, M., ÖNAL, H. C. (2019). The Evaluation of Public Private Partnership Models in Terms of Turkish Fiscal Policy. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1688–1708. https://ajindex.com/articles/270178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arata, M.; Petrangeli, M. & Longo, F. (2016). Innovative Approaches to Implement Road Infrastructure Concession through Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Initiatives: A Case Study. Transportation Research Procedia, 14 (2016), 343-352. Blending EU Structural and Investment Funds and PPPs in the 2014-2020
  2. Programming Period Guidance Note. (2016). European PPP Expertise Centre. Cuttaree, V.and Mandri-Perrott, C. (2010). Public-private partnerships in Europe and Central Asia. Washinton D.C.:The World Bank. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de KOİ Uygulamalarına İlişkin Gelişmeler. (2016). Kalkınma Bakanlığı Yatırım Programlama İzleme ve Değerlendirme Genel Müdürlüğü. Erdem, M., Şenyüz, D. ve Tatlıoğlu, İ. (2003). Kamu maliyesi. İstanbul:
  3. Ekin Kitapevi. Erdem, T. (2012, Mayıs). Yap-İşlet-Devret modeli kapsamındaki yatırımlara yönelik olarak getirilen KDV istisnası. Erişim adresi: http://www.vmhk.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Tahir-Erdem-Yap-İşlet-Devret-Modeli.pdf. Eurostat Treatment of Public-Private Partnerships Purposes, Methodology and Recent Trends (2010). European PPP Expertise Centre.Government at a Glance 2013 (2013). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2013-en. Green Paper On Public-Private Partnerships and Community Law on Public Contracts and Concessios (2004).
  4. European Commission. Hall, D. (2008). Critique of PPPs. A report commissioned by the European Federation of Public Service Unions. Hall, D. (2010). More Public Rescues For More Private Finance Failures - A Critique Of The EC Communication On PPPs. Public Services International Research Unit. Hand Out From Lessons to Principles for the use of Public-Private Partnerships. 32nd Annual meeting of Working Party of Senior Budget Officials (2011). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Herpen, G.W.E.B. van. (2002). Public private partnerships, the advantages and disadvantages examined, association for european transport. Ho, S.P. (2006). Model for financial renegotiation in public–private partnership projects and its policy implications: game theoretic view. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132 (7), 678-688.
  5. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2018). https://koi.kalkinma.gov.tr, 26.04.2018. Kamu Özel İşbirliği Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu (2014).
  6. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Kayalıdere, G. (2014). Mali Alan ve Kamu Maliyesi Perspektifinden Mali Alan Oluşturma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  7. Gazi Kitabevi.
  8. Kesik, A., Berksoy, T.