SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 7

Analysis of Turkey's Competitiveness in Live Animals, Meat and Seafood Exports

Türkiye'nin Canlı Hayvan, Et ve Deniz Ürünleri İhracatındaki Rekabet Gücünün Analizi

BİROL ERKAN
Pages
1843–1864
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate the condition mainly competitive disadvantage in the export of these products.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:On the product basis, one of the most important indicators which is able to use in order to measure of export competitiveness of countries is ,revealed comparative advantage (RCA) indexes'.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results greater than 1 show that the country has competitive advantage in the export of the production in question.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate the condition mainly competitive disadvantage in the export of these products.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

On the product basis, one of the most important indicators which is able to use in order to measure of export competitiveness of countries is ,revealed comparative advantage (RCA) indexes'. RCA indexes can be calculated by using Balassa Index and/or Vollrath Index. The results greater than 1 show that the country has competitive advantage in the export of the production in question. In the paper, between 1993-2014, it is aimed to determine the competitiveness in the export of live animals, meat products and seafoods. In this context, RCA indexes (Balassa Index and Vollrath Index) related to the export of 37 products are calculated. The results indicate the condition mainly competitive disadvantage in the export of these products.

Özet

Ülkelerin ürün bazında ihracat rekabet gücünün ölçümü amacıyla kullanılabilecek en önemli göstergelerden birisi ,açıklanmış karşılaştırmalı üstünlük (AKÜ) katsayıları' dır. AKÜ katsayıları Balassa İndeksi ve/veya Vollrath İndeksi kullanılarak hesaplanabilir. Sonucun 1'den büyük olması söz konusu ürünün ihracatında ülkenin rekabet avantajına sahip olduğunu gösterir. Çalışmada, 1993-2014 yılları arasında Türkiye'nin canlı hayvan, et ürünleri ve deniz ürünleri ihracatındaki rekabet gücünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, 37 ürünün ihracatına ilişkin AKÜ katsayıları (Balassa İndeksi ve Vollrath İndeksi) hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, söz konusu ürünlerin ihracatında ağırlıklı olarak rekabet dezavantajı durumunu işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAN, B. (2016). Analysis of Turkey's Competitiveness in Live Animals, Meat and Seafood Exports. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 7, 1843–1864. https://ajindex.com/articles/270057

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33(2). Banterle, A. (2005). Competitiveness and Agri-Food Trade:An Empirical Analysis in The European Union, 11.Congress of European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE)-The Future of Rural Europe in The Global Agri-Food System, Cophenagen, Denmark’den; Beningo, S. (2005). Trade and Transportation Between the United States and China,and Between the United States and India, 2006 Conference of the Society of Government Economists, Washington. Coxhead, I. (2007). A New Resource Curse?Impacts of China’s Boom on Comparative Advantage and Resource Dependence in Southeast Asia, World Development, 35(7). Cutrini, E. (2005). The Balassa İndeks Meets the Theil Index: A Decomposition Methodology for Logation Studies http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/ersa05/papers/123.pdf(Erişimarihi:11.01.2008).
  2. De Rosa, Dean A. (1996). Agricultural Trade and Rural Development in The Middle East and North Africa-Recent Developments and Prospects, Fourth Annual World Bank Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Development on ‘Rural Well-Being: From Vision to Action’, Washington. Erkan, B., Et al. (2015). Türkiye’nin Sebze İhracatında Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükleri, KSÜ Doğa Bil. Derg., 18(4). Havrila, I., Guanawarda, P. (2003). Analysing Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness:An Application to Australian’s Textile and Clothing Industries, Australian Economic Papers, 42(1). Hinloopen, J., Et al. (2004). P-P plots and the Harmonic Mass indeks:an application to comparative advantage, 30 July 2004 Seminar at the University of Adelaide, Australia. Hinloopen, J.,Et al. (2001). On the empirical distribution of the Balassa Index, Review of World Economics, 137(1). Chang, C. (1999). A Partial Equilibrium Analysis on the Effects of Trade Liberalization in APEC Food Sector, APEC Study Centre Consortium-1999
  3. Conference, The APEC Food System and its Implications, Auckland. Küçükkiremitçi, O. (2006). Sanayi Sektörünün Dış Ticaret Performansının Rekabet Gücüne Göre Değerlendirilmesi (1995-2005 Dönemi). Ulusal Bağımsızlık İçin Türkiye İktisat Politikaları Kurultayı, Malatya. Langhammer, R. (2006). Revealed Comparative Advantages in Service Trade of the USA,EU,and Japan.What Do They Tell Us?, http://opus.zbw-kiel.de/volltexte/2006/4005/pdf/langhammer_advantages.pdf(ErişimTarihi:22.01.2008).
  4. Lederman, D. (2006). Latin America’s Trade Specialization and China and