Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The Deepth of Turkish-Nato Defense Cooperation

Türk-Nato Savunma İş Birliği’nin Derinliği

Pages
884–897
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Indeed, it is seen that there is no real alliance Turkey-NATO relations, but interests are priorities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:When the world was divided into two blocs, the US and its allies formed NATO in 1949 to prevent the Soviet threat providing collective security in the West.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey has been a NATO member since 1952 to ensure the security, protect the Soviet threat and strengthen economic and military capacity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Indeed, it is seen that there is no real alliance Turkey-NATO relations, but interests are priorities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:NATO · Soğuk Savaş · Türkiye

Abstract

When the world was divided into two blocs, the US and its allies formed NATO in 1949 to prevent the Soviet threat providing collective security in the West. Turkey has been a NATO member since 1952 to ensure the security, protect the Soviet threat and strengthen economic and military capacity. Turkey has made an effort to ensure cooperation in membering process for 66 years. It has integrated NATO's policies into its own security and defense policies. It allowed the establishment of military bases and facilities and the keeping of personnel within the country. In addition to joint exercises with allies, it has participated in international peacekeeping operations. The aim of this study is to question depth of the relationship and cooperation between the two sides considering conflicts and crises since Turkey's membership. Indeed, it is seen that there is no real alliance Turkey-NATO relations, but interests are priorities.

Özet

Soğuk Savaş döneminde ABD ve Sovyetler Birliği’nin ideolojik bakış açılarının farklılığı sebebiyle dünya iki ayrı kutba ayrılmıştır. ABD ve müttefikleri, Sovyet tehdidini ve komünizmi önlemek ve Batı’da kolektif güvenliği sağlamak amacıyla 1949’da NATO’yu kurmuşlardır. Türkiye 1952 yılında, güvenliğini sağlamak, Sovyet tehdidinden ve komünizm etkisinden korunmak, Batılı kimliğine kavuşmak ve ekonomiyi ve askeri kapasiteyi güçlendirmek gibi dinamiklerin etkisiyle NATO’ya üye olmuştur. 66 yıllık üyelik sürecinde Türkiye, iş birliğinin sağlanması için çaba sarf etmiştir. NATO’nun politikalarını kendi güvenlik ve savunma politikalarına entegre etmiş, sınırları içinde askeri üslerin kurulmasına, personel bulundurulmasına izin vermiştir. NATO müttefikleriyle düzenlenen ortak tatbikatlara ve uluslararası ortamda barışın sağlanması ve sürekliliği için operasyonlara katılmıştır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’nin NATO’ya üyeliğinden itibaren yaşanan çatışma ve krizler göz önünde bulundurularak iş birliğinin derinliğini tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Nitekim Türkiye-NATO ilişkisinde, çıkar çatışmasının krizlere yol açtığı ve gerçek bir ittifakın olmadığı, çıkarların öncelikli olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALCI, M. (2018). The Deepth of Turkish-Nato Defense Cooperation. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 884–897. https://ajindex.com/articles/269707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akkaya, B. (2012). Turkey's Membership in NATO and the Korean War. Academic View Journal, 28, 1-20.
  2. Alper, S, Arap, E. & Değirmencioğlu, S. (2014). The Korean War. Ankara Bar Association Law Agenda Journal, 1, 74-83.
  3. Bölme, S. (2012). Military Bases in the NATO-US-Turkey Triangle During the Cold War: Continuity and Change. International Relations Journal, 9(34), 51-71. Centre of Excellence Defence Against Terrorism (CEDAT) (2018). Functions and Activities, http://www.tmmm.tsk.tr/functions_tr.html. Date of Accession: 31.01.2018.
  4. Cıvaoğlu, G. (2017, 6 Ocak). İncirlik was closed to the USA, Milliyet Newspaper, http://www.milliyet.com.tr/yazarlar/guneri-civaoglu/incirlik-abd-ye-kapatilmisti-2374456/. Date of Accession: 31.01.2018.
  5. CVCE (2018). Vandenberg Resolution, https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/vandenberg_resolution_washington_11_june_1948-en-dc0ca210-8f4c-43e0-b353-1793b42c6d5c.html. Date of Accession: 19.01.2018.
  6. Deutsche Welle (2017). “S-400 Agreement and NATO”, 15.09.2017, http://www.dw.com/tr/s-400-anla%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1-ve-nato/a-40530983. Date of Accession: 01.02.2018.
  7. Ekici, S. & Baharçiçek, A. (2016). Turkey-The US Relations in NATO Membership Process. Individual and Society Journal, 6(11), 149-166.
  8. Ertürk, T. (2015). “The US Shot Muavemet Deliberately”, Oda TV, 02.10.2015, https://odatv.com/abd-muaveneti-kasten-vurdu-0210151200.html. Date of Accession: 01.02.2018.
  9. Eşel, G. (2017). Turkey-NATO Relations in Between Coups (1960-1970). The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, (56), 409-416.
  10. Hasançebi, M. (2013). Turkey and NATO Relations. Academic Perspective, http://akademikperspektif.com/2013/06/24/turkiye-ve-nato-iliskileri/. Date of Accession: 30.01.2018.
  11. Historical Events (2018). NATO, http://www.tarihiolaylar.com/tarihi-olaylar-detay.php?id=382 Date of Accession: 20.01.2018. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) (2018). NATO, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/nato-tarihce.tr.mfa. Date of Accession: 20.01.2018. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) (2018). Turkey’s Security (NATO). http://www.mfa.gov.tr/sub.tr.mfa?7e7d7c50-24c1-4fb0-aaae-0477bedcd41f. Date of Accession: 27.01.2018.
  12. NATO (2007). Decade of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council: Personal Thoughts, https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2007/issue2/turkish/art5.html. Date of Accession: 31.01.2018.
  13. NATO (2016). Basic Texts, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/57772.htm#I. Date of Accession: 19.01.2018.
  14. NATO (2016). Operations and missions: Past and present, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_52060.htm.