SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Perception of Innovation For the Next 25 Years: International Perspective

Murat NAZLI
E. Evla MUTLU KESİCİ
Pages
264–282
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results; professionals' perception of innovative sectors intensify in medical, health, information technology and renewable energy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The fundamental purpose of this study is to analyze and comprehend the international future perception of innovation in the next 25 years by the academicians, international organizations, associations of innovation professionals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Along with the use of a semi-structured questionnaire for a sample size consists of 31 professionals from 12 countries, professionals are asked to express their perceptions about the triggers and obstacles of innovation, innovative sectors and status of human resources in future.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results; professionals' perception of innovative sectors intensify in medical, health, information technology and renewable energy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The fundamental purpose of this study is to analyze and comprehend the international future perception of innovation in the next 25 years by the academicians, international organizations, associations of innovation professionals. Along with the use of a semi-structured questionnaire for a sample size consists of 31 professionals from 12 countries, professionals are asked to express their perceptions about the triggers and obstacles of innovation, innovative sectors and status of human resources in future. According to the results; professionals' perception of innovative sectors intensify in medical, health, information technology and renewable energy. The respondents emphasized that qualifications of future human resources are expected to be more creative, flexible, communication based and co-creative. On the other hand, threats for innovation in future is perceived to be financing, lack of applications of policies and fear of change etc. Details are given and discussed within the research. The study sheds a light on future innovation perceptions of professionals from different countries and backgrounds.

🔖

Cite This Article

NAZLI, M., KESİCİ, E. E. M. (2016). Perception of Innovation For the Next 25 Years: International Perspective. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 264–282. https://ajindex.com/articles/269407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bach, T., De Francesco, F., Maggetti, M., Ruffing, E., De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., and Tummers, L., (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future doi:10.1111/padm.12209. Agenda. Public Administration, (1), 146. Baker W. E. and Sinkula J. M., (2002). "Market orientation, learning orientation and product innovation: delving into the organization's black box", Journal of Market- Focused Management, 5 (1), 5-23.
  2. Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., and Vargo, S. L., (2015). "Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions", MIS Quarterly, 39 (1), 135-154.
  3. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhard, K. M., (1995). "Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions", Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 343-78.
  4. Chandy, R. K., Tellis, G. J., (2000). "The incumbents curse: incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing", 64, 1-17.
  5. Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., and Chung, S. H., (2011). "The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance & competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E", Logistics and Transportation Review, 47 (6), 822-836.
  6. Cooper, R. G., (1979). "The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure", Journal of Marketing, 43, 93-103.
  7. Cowan, R. L. (2012). "It's Complicated: Defining Workplace Bullying From the Human Resource Professional's Perspective", Management Communication Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/0893318912439474. Cullen, R. and Marshall, S. (2006). "Genetic research and genetic information: a health information professional's perspective on the benefits and risks", Health Information & Libraries Journal, 23, 275-282. doi:10.1111/j.1471- 1842.2006.00666.x. Daft, R. L., (1982). Bureaucratic versus non-bureaucratic structure and the process of innovation and change. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.). Research in the sociology of organizations, 1: 129-166. Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
  8. Daly, J., (22 August 2000). Sage Advice: An Exclusive Interview with Peter Drucker, Business 2.0. Damanpour, F., (1991). "Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators", Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555- 590. Damanpour, F., and Evan, W. M., (1984). "Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag", Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 392- 409. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., and Wright, M., (2016). "Innovat