SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

An Integrated MCDM Model for Occupational Safety Specialist Selection

ZEHRA KAMIŞLI ÖZTÜRK
ŞURA TOPTANCI
Pages
419–435
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated in a real application

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For businesses in the public and private sectors, the selection process of occupational safety specialist is critical since these employees identify and prevent work-related hazards.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the field of human resource management, using an effective and accurate model for the selection of these employees is especially valuable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated in a real application
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

For businesses in the public and private sectors, the selection process of occupational safety specialist is critical since these employees identify and prevent work-related hazards. In the field of human resource management, using an effective and accurate model for the selection of these employees is especially valuable. In this study, the occupational safety specialist problem is considered for a Mutual Health and Safety Unit. The selection is made among five candidates who pass pre-selection process. An integrated multi-criteria decision making model based on Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks (BOCR) criteria has been developed for this study. AHP is used to determine the weights of selection criteria and COPRAS is used to select the most pertinent personnel in correlation the selection criteria. To determine BOCR priorities a five-point scale and for other pairwise comparisons Saaty’s 1-9 scale are used. The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated in a real application

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, Z. K., TOPTANCI, Ş. (2017). An Integrated MCDM Model for Occupational Safety Specialist Selection. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 419–435. https://ajindex.com/articles/269393

References (16)

  1. and ARAS methods”, Manas Journal of Social Studies, Vol.5, No.2, 124-138.
  2. Akın, N.G. (2016). “Personel seçiminde çok kriterli karar verme: Bulanık TOPSIS uygulaması”, Journal of Business Research Turk, Vol.8, No.2, 224-254.
  3. Aksakal, E., Dağdeviren, M. (2010). “An integrated approach for personel selection with DEMATEL and ANP methods”, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ, Vol. 25, No. 4, 905-913.
  4. Capaldo, G., Zollo, G. (2001). “Applying fuzzy logic to personel assessment: A case study”, Int J Manage Sci, Vol. 29, No.6, 585-597.
  5. Çelik, M., Kandakoğlu, A., Er, I.D., (2009). “Structuring fuzzy integrated multi-stages evaluation model on academic personnel recruitment in MET institutions”, Expert Syst Appl., Vol.36, No.3, 6918-6927.
  6. Dağdeviren, M. (2007). “Personnel selection with fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and an application”, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ., Vol. 22, No. 4, 791-799.
  7. Das, M.C., Sarkar, B., Ray, S. (2012). “A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated Fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol.46, No.3, 230-241.
  8. Dursun, M., Karsak, E.E. (2010). “A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection”, Expert Syst Appl., Vol. 37, No.6, 4324-4330.
  9. El-Santawy, M.F., El-Dean, R.A.Z. (2012). “On using VIKOR for ranking personnel problem”, Life Sci J., Vol. 9, No. 4, 1534-1536.
  10. Gargano, M.L., Marose, R.A., Kleeck, L. (1991). “An application of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms to personnel selection in the financial industry”, In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications, 257-262.
  11. Gibney, R., Shang, J. (2007). “Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process”, Math Comput Model, Vol. 46, No.7-8, 1030-1040
  12. Güngör, Z., Serhadlıoğlu, G., Kesen, S.E. (2009). “A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem”, Appl Soft Comput, Vol. 9, No.2, 641-646.
  13. İş Güvenliği Uzmanlarının Görev, Yetki, Sorumluluk ve Eğitimleri Hakkında Yönetmelik. (2012).
  14. Resmi Gazete, Sayı: 28512, Madde 7-10.
  15. Kabak, M., Burmaoğlu, S., Kazançoğlu, Y. (2012). “A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection”, Expert Syst Appl., Vol. 39, 3516-3525. Karabašević, D., Stanujkić, D., Urošević, S. (2015). “The MCDM model for personnel selection based on SWARA and ARAS Methods”, Management, Vol. 20, No.77, 43-52.
  16. Karsak, E.E. (2000). “A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for personnel selection”, In: IEEE Int Conf Syst M