Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Assessing the Factors that Impact Non-Performing Loan Ratio: An Application On Deposit Banks By Using Dynamic Panel Data

Takipteki Kredi Oranını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi: Mevduat Bankaları Üzerinde Bir Dinamik Panel Veri Uygulaması

Pages
538–555
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the results are consistent with moral hazard and bad managemet hypothesis, they are inconsistent with diversification hypothesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the factors that are effective on non-performing loans ratio after the 2001 local financial crisis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:State-owned banks, privately-owned banks and foreign banks that operate in Turkey between the years 2002 and 2014 are examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the results are consistent with moral hazard and bad managemet hypothesis, they are inconsistent with diversification hypothesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to determine the factors that are effective on non-performing loans ratio after the 2001 local financial crisis. State-owned banks, privately-owned banks and foreign banks that operate in Turkey between the years 2002 and 2014 are examined. According to System-GMM and Difference GMM results, lagged value of non-performing loans, net interest margin, capital adequacy and solvency ratio have negative effects on non-performing loans ratio. On the other hand, interest applied to loans, loans/ deposits ratio, inefficiency and operating efficiency have positive effects on non performing loans. Although the results are consistent with moral hazard and bad managemet hypothesis, they are inconsistent with diversification hypothesis.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 2001 yerel finansal krizi sonrasında bankaların takipteki kredi oranları üzerinde etkili olan faktörlerin belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla çalışma kapsamında 2002-2014 yılları arasında Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren kamusal sermayeli mevduat bankaları, özel sermayeli yerli mevduat bankaları ve Türkiye'de kurulmuş yabancı sermayeli mevduat bankaları incelenmiştir. GMM yöntemlerinden (Generalized Method of Moments- Genelleştirilmiş Momentler Metodu) Sistem GMM ve Fark GMM kullanılarak yapılan analiz sonucunda bir önceki dönemdeki takipteki kredi oranı, net faiz marjı, sermaye yeterliliği ve ödeme gücü oranının takipteki krediler üzerinde negatif etkileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kredilere uygulanan faiz, kredi/ mevduat oranı, etkinsizlik ve faaliyet etkinliği değişkenleri ile ise takipteki krediler arasında pozitif ilişki bulunmuştur. Ahlaki tehlike hipotezi ve kötü yönetim hipotezi ile uyumlu sonuçlar bulunurken, çeşitlendirme hipotezi ile zıt sonuçlar bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABDİOĞLU, N., AYTEKİN, S. (2016). Assessing the Factors that Impact Non-Performing Loan Ratio: An Application On Deposit Banks By Using Dynamic Panel Data. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 538–555. https://ajindex.com/articles/269096

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alper, D., Anbar, A., (2011). "Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Turkey", Business and Economics Research Journal, Vol.2, No.2, 139-152.
  2. Arellano, M., Bond, S., (1991). "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data. Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", Review Economic Studies, Vol.58, 277-297.
  3. Arellano, M., Bover, O., (1995). "Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Correction Models", Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, 29-51.
  4. Arslan, Ö., Karan, M. B., (2009). "Credit Risks and Internationalization of SMEs", Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol.10, No.4, 361-368.
  5. Badar, M., Javid, A. Y., (2013). "Impact of Macroeconomic Forces on Nonperforming Loans: An Empirical Study of Commercial Banks in Pakistan", Transactions on Business and Economics, Vol.10, 40-48.
  6. Bebczuk, R., Sangiácomo, M., (2008), "The Determinants Of Non-Performing Loan Portfolio in The Argentine Banking System", Ensayos Económicos, Vol.51, 83- 121. Berger, A. N., DeYoung, R., (1997). "Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks", Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.21, 849-870.
  7. Blundell, R., Bond, S., (1998). "Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models", Journal of Econometrics, Vol.87, 115-143.
  8. Boudriga, A., Taktak, N. B., Jellouli, S., (2010). "Bank Specific, Business and Institutional Environment Determinants of Banks Nonperforming Loans: Evidence from MENA Countries", Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series, No.547. Clair, R. T., (1992). "Loan Growth and Loan Quality: Some Preliminary Evidence from Texas Banks", Economic Review, 3rd Quarter, 9-22.
  9. Çifter, A., Yılmazer, S., Çifter, E., (2009). "Analysis of Sectoral Credit Default Cycle Dependency with Wavelet Networks: Evidence from Turkey", Economic Modelling, Vol.26, 1382-1388.
  10. Espinoza, R., Prasad, A., (2010). "Nonperforming Loans in the GCC Banking System and their Macroeconomic Effects", International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No.10/224. Ghosh, A., (2015). "Banking-Industry Specific and Regional Economic Determinants of Non-performing Loans: Evidence from US States", Journal of Financial Stability, Vol.20, 93-104.
  11. Hu, J. L., Li. Y., Chiu, Y. H., (2004). "Ownership and Nonperforming Loans: Evidence from Taiwan's Banks", The Developing Economies, Vol.42, No.3, 405-420.
  12. İslamoğlu, M., (2015). "The Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Non-performing Loan Ratio of Pub