Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Entrepreneurial Orientation, Strategic Orientation And Performance Relationship: A Case Study For Textile Firms In Istanbul

Girişimci Yönlülük, Stratejik Yönlülük ve Performans İlişkisi: İstanbul İli Tekstil İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama

Pages
376–403
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All of the three hypotheses were accepted and the research model that was created depending on the hypotheses was entirely verified

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims an empirical research to determine entrepreneurial orientation, strategic orientation and performance relationship for textile firms that operate in Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Questionnaire method was used in the study that was organized in three layers as entrepreneurial orientation, strategic orientation and performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All of the three hypotheses were accepted and the research model that was created depending on the hypotheses was entirely verified
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims an empirical research to determine entrepreneurial orientation, strategic orientation and performance relationship for textile firms that operate in Istanbul. Questionnaire method was used in the study that was organized in three layers as entrepreneurial orientation, strategic orientation and performance. The created questionnaire was applied to 400 firms with face-to-face interview technic and the obtained data was analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model analysis were conducted in data analysis by using Lisrel 8.7 statistics package program. All of the three hypotheses were accepted and the research model that was created depending on the hypotheses was entirely verified

Özet

Bu çalışma İstanbul ilinde faaliyet gösteren tekstil sektör işletmelerinin girişimci yönlülük, stratejik yönlülük ve performans ilişkisini belirlemeye yönelik görgül bir araştırmayı amaçlar. Girişimci yönlülük, stratejik yönlülük ve performans olarak üç boyutlu tasarlanan çalışmada anket yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Anket çalışması 400 işletmeyle yüz yüze görüşme yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiş ve elde edilen veriler değerlendirilmeye alınmıştır. Verilerin analizinde, Lisrel 8.7 istatistiki program yardımıyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik model analizi ile test edilmiştir. Analizde araştırmada oluşturulan, her üç hipotez kabul edilmiş olup hipotezler sonucunda oluşturulan araştırma modeli tam olarak doğrulanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

HAMŞIOĞLU, A. B. (2017). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Strategic Orientation And Performance Relationship: A Case Study For Textile Firms In Istanbul. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 376–403. https://ajindex.com/articles/269053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akman G., Özkan C., Eriş H., (2008). “Stratejik Odaklılık ve Firma Stratejilerinin Firma Performansına Etkisinin Analizi”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt.7, Sayı, 13, 93-115.
  2. Altuntaş G., Dönmez D., (2010). “Girişimcilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Performans İlişkisi: Çanakkale Bölgesinde Faaliyet Gösteren Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt,39, Sayı,1, 50-74.
  3. Antoncic B. ve Zorn O. (2001). “The Mediating Role of Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Organizational Support-Performance Relationship: An Empirical Examination”, Managing Global Transitions, Vol.2, No.1, 5-14.
  4. Atuane-Gima, K., (1995). “An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, No.4, 275-293.
  5. Atuahene-Gima, K., Ko, A., (2001). “An Emprical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation”, Organization Science, Vol.12, No, 1, 54-73.
  6. Baker W., Sinkula J.,M., (1999). “Learning Orientation Market Orientation and Innovation: Integrating and Extending Models of Organizational Performance”, Journal of Market Focused Management, Vol. 4, No.4, 293-308. Barney J., (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No.1,99-120.
  7. Bentler P.M.(1990). “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.17, No.2, 238-246.
  8. Byrne, B., M., (2004). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS, Second Edition, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York. Conant J.,S., Mokwa M.,P., Varadarajan P.,R., (1990). “Strategic Types Distinctive Marketing Competencies and Organizational Performance: A Multile Measures Based Study”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, No. 5, 365-383.
  9. Covin J., Slevin D., P., (1989). “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Bening Environments”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, 75-87.
  10. Covin, J., Gren K., M., Slevin D., P., (2006). “Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation Sales Growth Rate Relationship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practices, Vol. 30, No, 1, 57-82.
  11. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LİSREL Uygulamaları, Ankara:
  12. Pegem Akademi. Day S., G., Wensley R., (1983). “Marketing Theory with Strategic Orientation”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47, No. 4, 79-89.
  13. Deshpande, R., Far