Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Precarious Work in Turkey: A Comparison with EU Member Countries

Pages
436–453
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate that Turkey ranks low relative to EU members in most dimensions of precariousness, especially in employment contracts and weekly working hours

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Precarious work is known for its deleterious effects on workers and it is on the rise especially in developing economies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using the data from the 5th European Working Conditions Survey; this study uses the type of contracts, income, job insecurity, employability, health and safety risks, autonomy, participation and working hours as indicators of precarious employment and compares figures from a candidate country to the European Union member countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicate that Turkey ranks low relative to EU members in most dimensions of precariousness, especially in employment contracts and weekly working hours
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Precarious work is known for its deleterious effects on workers and it is on the rise especially in developing economies. The purpose of this study is to examine the precarious employment indicators of Turkey in comparison with EU member countries. Using the data from the 5th European Working Conditions Survey; this study uses the type of contracts, income, job insecurity, employability, health and safety risks, autonomy, participation and working hours as indicators of precarious employment and compares figures from a candidate country to the European Union member countries. Results indicate that Turkey ranks low relative to EU members in most dimensions of precariousness, especially in employment contracts and weekly working hours

🔖

Cite This Article

EMRE, O., POLAT, V., DUMAN, Y. S. (2017). Precarious Work in Turkey: A Comparison with EU Member Countries. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 436–453. https://ajindex.com/articles/269003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. 5th European Working Conditions Survey Technical Report, 2010,
  2. Gallup Europe. Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1989).
  3. Content, Cause, and Consequences of Job Insecurity: a Theory-Based Measure and Substantive Test. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 803–829. http://doi.org/10.2307/256569
  4. Benach, J., & Muntaner, C. (2007). Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(4), 276– 277. http://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.045237
  5. Berntson, E., Naswall, K., & Sverke, M. (2010). The moderating role of employability on the relationship between job insecurity and commitment to change. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31, 327–344. http://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X09351214
  6. Berntson, E., Sverke, M., & Marklund, S. (2006). Predicting Perceived Employability: Human Capital or Labour Market Opportunities? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 27(2), 223–244. http://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X06063098 Challenging the Market: The Struggle to Regulate Work and Income. (2004).
  7. In Stanford J., Vosko L., Stanford J., & Vosko L. (Eds.), Challenging the Market: The Struggle to Regulate Work and Income (pp. 3-30). McGill-Queen's University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt80j5j.4
  8. Cranford, C. J., Vosko, L. F., & Zukewich, N. (2003). Precarious Employment in the Canadian Labour Market: A Statistica Portrait. Just Labour, 3(Fall), 6–22.
  9. Dekker, S. W. A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1995). The Effects of Job Insecurity on Psychological Health and Withdrawal: A Longitudinal Study. Australian Psychologist. http://doi.org/10.1080/00050069508259607
  10. Forrier, A., & Sels, L. (2003). The concept employability: a complex mosaic. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 3(2), 102. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2003.002414
  11. Fox, F. V., & Staw, B. M. (1979). The trapped administrator: effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(3), 449–471. http://doi.org/10.2307/2989922
  12. Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
  13. Gilboa, S., Shirom, A., Fried, Y., & Cooper, C. (2008). a Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects, 227–271.
  14. Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job Insecurity: Toward C