SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2008 / Sayı: 13

Why are Some People More Happy? The Role of Psychological Needs in Subjective Well-Being

Bazı İnsanlar Neden Daha Mutludur? Öznel İyi Olma Sürecinde Psikolojik İhtiyaçların Rolü

Öğr. Gör. Dr. Zeynep CİHANGİR ÇANKAYA
Pages
29–36
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study examined basic needs satisfaction that seem likely to influence subjective well-being and relationship between subjective well-being and basic needs satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Subjective well-being refered to colloquially as “happiness” is a person’s evaluation of his or her life.This evaluation is both cognitive and affective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are differences between people about well-being level and some people seems more happy than others.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study examined basic needs satisfaction that seem likely to influence subjective well-being and relationship between subjective well-being and basic needs satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar · iyi olma · mutluluk

Abstract

Subjective well-being refered to colloquially as “happiness” is a person’s evaluation of his or her life.This evaluation is both cognitive and affective. There are differences between people about well-being level and some people seems more happy than others. This point related to there are a lot of factors that to influence subjective well-being. In this study examined basic needs satisfaction that seem likely to influence subjective well-being and relationship between subjective well-being and basic needs satisfaction.

Özet

Günlük konuşma dilinde mutluluk olarak da kullanılan öznel iyi olma kavramı bireylerin yaşamlarını değerlendirmeleridir. Bu değerlendirme bilişsel ve duyuşsal olmak üzere iki boyutludur. İnsanların iyi olma düzeyleri farklılık göstermekte ve bazı bireyler diğerlerinden daha çok mutlu görünmektedir. Bu durum öznel iyi olmayı etkileyen pek çok faktörün bulunmasıyla ilişkilidir. Bu çalışmada öznel iyi olmayı etkileyen faktörlerden temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların iyi olma kavramıyla ilişkisi incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇANKAYA, Ö. G. D. Z. C. (2008). Why are Some People More Happy? The Role of Psychological Needs in Subjective Well-Being. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 13, 29–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/2690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Andersen, S. (2000). Fundamental human needs: ma- king social cognition relevant. Psychological Inqu- iry, 11, (4), 269-276.
  2. Basabe, M., Thomson, T. ve Davidson, J. (2003). Cul- tural dimension, socioeconomics development, cli- mate and emotional hedonic level. Cognition and Emotion. 16 (1), 103-125.
  3. Baumeister, R. ve Leary, M. (1995). The need to be- long: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fun- damental human motivation. Psychological Bulle- tin. 117(3), 497-529.
  4. Cihangir-Çankaya, Z. (2005). Öz-belirleme modeli: özerklik desteği, ihtiyaç doyumu, iyi olma. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, G.Ü. Eğitim Bilim- leri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  5. Cihangir-Çankaya, Z.(2006). Öğretmen adaylarında te- mel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve iyi olma. 15. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresinde sunulmuş bildi- ri. Muğla Üniveristesi: Muğla. David, J., Green, P., Martin, S. ve Suls, C. (1997). Dif- ferential roles of neuroticism, extraversion and event desirability for mood in daily life: an integrati- ve model of top-down and bottom-up influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 149-159.
  6. Deci, E. ve Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  7. Deci, E. ve Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuıts: human needs and the self-determi- nation of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227-269.
  8. Deneve, K. ve Cooper, H. (1998). The happy persona- lity a meta analysis of personality traits and subjec- tive well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197- 229. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
  9. Diener, E., Suh,E. ve Oishi,S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25-41.
  10. Diener, E., Suh, E. ve Lucas, E. (1999). Subjective well- being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2), 276-302.
  11. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 34-39.
  12. Diener, E. ve Seligman, M. (2002). Very happy people. American Psychological Society. 13 (1), 81-84.
  13. Dio, D. (2003). Need satisfaction in romantic relations- hip: relations to communion, unmitigated commu- nion and well – being. Rochester: University of Rochester (Doktora Tezi).İnternetten 15 Şubat 2005’de elde edilmiştir. http://wwwlib.umi.com/dis- sertations/preview/3102271 Inglewed, D., Markland, D. ve Sheppard, K. (2004), Personality and self-determination of exercise be- haviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 36,