Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Analyzing the Attitudes of Turkish Shipowning Companies Towards Green Shipping Application Aiming Sustainable Transportation

Pages
229–245
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They, however, have not reached concensus on some statements related to “shipping documents”, “shipping materials” and difficulties of “implementing green shipping applications”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Maritime transport is the basis of world trade and globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although maritime transportation has the lowest negative impact on the environment, it has still effecting the environment through shipping emissions, oil spills, solid wastes, sewage and noise pollution from the ships.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They, however, have not reached concensus on some statements related to “shipping documents”, “shipping materials” and difficulties of “implementing green shipping applications”.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Maritime transport is the basis of world trade and globalization. Although maritime transportation has the lowest negative impact on the environment, it has still effecting the environment through shipping emissions, oil spills, solid wastes, sewage and noise pollution from the ships. Therefore, maritime transport activities are becoming one of the most important topics on sustainability debate. This study aims to analyze the attitudes of Turkish shipowning companies towards green shipping applications including a thorough review of the literature and implementing a Delphi research. At the end of the third round of Delphi research, the respondents have reached a consensus on such domains as “company policy and procedures”, “shipping equipment”, “shipper cooperation”, “shipping design and compliance”, as well as the reasons for and the benefits of adapting and implementing green shipping practices. They, however, have not reached concensus on some statements related to “shipping documents”, “shipping materials” and difficulties of “implementing green shipping applications”.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAZ, İ. S., ÇETİN, İ. B. (2018). Analyzing the Attitudes of Turkish Shipowning Companies Towards Green Shipping Application Aiming Sustainable Transportation. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 229–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/268850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Al-Omiri, M.; Drury C. (2007). Organizational and behavioral factors influencing the adoption and success of ABC in the UK. Cost Manag, 21, 38. Arslan, S.; Varol N.B. (2010). Storage costs in respect to activity-based cost on the logistics chain and a case study. Account Auditing Rev, 69-88.
  2. Askarany, D.; Yazdifar, H.; Askary, S. (2010). Supply chain management, activity-based costing and organisational factors. Int J Prod Econ, 127 (2010): 238-248.
  3. Askarany, D.; Yazdifar, H.; Askary, S. (2012). An investigation into the mixed reported adoption rates for ABC: Evidence from Australia, New Zealand and the UK. Int J Prod Econ, 135 (1): 430-439.
  4. Baykasoğlu, A.; Kaplanoğlu, V. (2008). Application of activity-based costing to a land transportation company: A case study. Int J Prod Econ, 116 (2): 308-324.
  5. Bras, B.; Emblemsvag J. (1995). The use of activity-based costing, uncertainty, and disassembly action charts in demanufacture cost assessments. 1995 ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, September, 17-20.
  6. Brierley, J.A.; Cowton, C.J.; Drury, C. A (2006). Comparison of product costing practices in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing and continuous production process manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ, 100: 314–321.
  7. Chen, F.F. (1996). Activity-Based Approach to Justification of Advanced Factory Management Systems. Ind Man Data Sys, 96 (2): 17-27.
  8. Chileshe, N.; Rameezdeen, R.; Hosseini, M.R. (2016). Drivers for adopting reverse logistics in the construction industry: a qualitative study. Eng Constr Archit Manag, 23 (2): 134-157.
  9. Chileshe, N.; Rameezdeen, R.; Hosseini, M.R.; Lehmann, S.; Udeaja, C. (2016). Analysis of reverse logistics implementation practices by South Australian construction organizations. Int J Oper Prod Manag, 36 (3): 332-356.
  10. Coates, G.; Rahimifard, S. A cost estimation framework to support increased value recovery from end-of-life vehicles. Int J Comput Integr Manuf, 2008, 21 (8): 895-910.
  11. Dekker, H.C.; van Goor, A.R. (2000). Supply chain management and management accounting: a case study of activity based costing. Int J Logist: Res Appl, 3(1): 41–52.
  12. Deran, A.; Arslan, S.; Köksal, A.G. İşletmelerde Lojistik Maliyetlerin Hesaplanması. Eğitim Press,
  13. Konya, Turkey. Demirel, E.; Demirel, N.; Gökçen, H. (2016). A mixed integer linear programming model to optimize reverse logistics activities of end-of-life vehicles in Turkey. J Clean Prod, 112(3): 2101–2113.
  14. Demirel, N.Ö.; Gökçen, H. (2008). A mixed integer program