SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Charismatic Leadership and Organizational Identification on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention

Karizmatik Liderlik ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin İş tatmini ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi

Ayşe Alev YAVAN
ALPTEKİN SÖKMEN
Yunus BIYIK
Pages
898–913
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, research findings show that the effect of charismatic leadership is partly mediated by organizational identification in the effect on job satisfaction and turnover intention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to show the effect of charismatic leadership and organizational identification on job satisfaction and turnover intention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research data was obtained from 195 people working in the general directorate of a public bank.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, research findings show that the effect of charismatic leadership is partly mediated by organizational identification in the effect on job satisfaction and turnover intention.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to show the effect of charismatic leadership and organizational identification on job satisfaction and turnover intention. The research data was obtained from 195 people working in the general directorate of a public bank. According to the correlation analysis, there is a significant positive correlation between charismatic leadership and organizational identification and job satisfaction. On the other hand, charismatic leadership and organizational identification have a significant negative relationship with turnover intention. As a result of regression analysis, charismatic leadership and organizational identification have a meaningful effect on job satisfaction and turnover intention. However, research findings show that the effect of charismatic leadership is partly mediated by organizational identification in the effect on job satisfaction and turnover intention.

Özet

Bu çalışmada karizmatik liderlik ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin iş tatmini ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisini ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma verileri, bir kamu bankasının genel müdürlüğünde çalışan 195 kişiden elde edilmiştir. Yapılan korelasyon analizine göre karizmatik liderlik ile örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş tatmini arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki, karizmatik liderlik ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin de işten ayrılma niyetiyle negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Regresyon analizi sonucunda karizmatik liderliğin ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin, iş tatmini ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu görülmektedir. Bununla birlikte araştırma bulguları karizmatik liderliğin iş tatmini ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin kısmı aracılık etkisinin olduğu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVAN, A. A., SÖKMEN, A., BIYIK, Y. (2018). The Effect of Charismatic Leadership and Organizational Identification on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 898–913. https://ajindex.com/articles/268816

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alegre, I., Mas-Machuca, M., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2015). Antecedents of employee job satisfaction: Do they matter?. Journal of Business Research., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.113
  2. Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of management, 29(1), 99-118.
  3. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of management, 34(3), 325-374.
  4. Babcock-Roberson, M. E., & Strickland, O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of psychology, 144(3), 313-326.
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  6. Bluedorn, A.C., (1982), “A unified model of turnover from organizations”, Human Relations, 35, 135-153.
  7. Castle, N. G., Engberg, J., Anderson, R., & Men, A. (2007). Job satisfaction of nurse aides in nursing homes: Intent to leave and turnover. The Gerontologist, 47(2), 193-204.
  8. Cellucci, A. J., & DeVries, D. L. (1978). Measuring managerial satisfaction: A manual for the MJSQ (No. 11). Center for Creative Leadership. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of management review, 12(4), 637-647.
  9. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of organizational behavior, 15(5), 439-452.
  10. Davis, K., Newstrom, J. W. (1989). Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior, 8th. Edition.
  11. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. Deluga, R. J. (1995). The relationship between attributional charismatic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1652-1669.
  12. Dormann, C., Zapf, D. (2001). Job satisfaction: A meta􀀀analysis of stabilities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5), 483-504.
  13. Elenkov, D. S. (2002). Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies. Journal of Business Research, 55(6), 467-480.
  14. Emery, C. R., & Barker, K. J. (2007). The effect of transactional and transformational leadership styles on the organizati