Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2014 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Submandibular Gland Excision: Analysis of 43 Cases

Submandibular Bez Eksizyonu: 43 Olgunun Analizi

Pages
199–201
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, we assume that submandibular gland excision is a safe surgical procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim:­ To retrospectively evaluate indications for surgery, histopathological results and surgery complications in patients who underwent submandibular gland excision.Methods:­ We retrospectively analyzed indications for surgery, age, sex, histopathological results, and surgery complications in 43 patients who underwent submandibular gland excision in our hospital between 2008 and 2012.Results:­ A total of 43 patients [30 male (69.7%), 13 female (30.2%)] were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The minimum postoperative follow-up period was 6 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, we assume that submandibular gland excision is a safe surgical procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim:­ To retrospectively evaluate indications for surgery, histopathological results and surgery complications in patients who underwent submandibular gland excision.Methods:­ We retrospectively analyzed indications for surgery, age, sex, histopathological results, and surgery complications in 43 patients who underwent submandibular gland excision in our hospital between 2008 and 2012.Results:­ A total of 43 patients [30 male (69.7%), 13 female (30.2%)] were included in the study. The minimum postoperative follow-up period was 6 months. The mean age of the patients was 42.4 years, ranging from 11 to 86 years. 30 (69.7%) had painless swelling, 10 (23.2%) had painful swelling after eating, and three (6.9%) patients had infections frequently with pus spilling into the mouth. According to the histopathological results, 39 benign and four malign materials were excised and, sialadenitis was the most frequent benign pathology. As complications of the surgery; marginal mandibular nerve injury was seen in 4 patients (1 patient with persistent and three patients with transient nerve damage) and 2 patients had hematoma after surgery.Conclusion:­The distribution of submandibular gland materials according to the histopathological types was similar to that in the literature. Although marginal facial nerve injury is the most common complication of submandibular gland excision, it was observed in our cases that only one patient experienced permanent nerve damage. Therefore, we assume that submandibular gland excision is a safe surgical procedure.

Özet

Amaç: Submandibuler bez eksizyonu endikasyonlarını, histopatolojik sonuçlarını komplikasyonlarını retrospektif olarak değerlendirmek.Yöntemler:­Hastanemizde 2008-2012 yılları arasında submandibular bez eksizyonu yapılan 43 olgu çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların endikasyonları, yaş ve cinsiyet dağılımı, histopatolojik sonuçları ve cerrahinin komplikasyonları değerlendirildi.Bulgular: 2008-2012 yılları arasında cerrahi sonrasında minimum altı ay takipli 43 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların yaşları 11 yıl ile 86 yıl (ortalama 42,4) arasında değişen 30'u (%69,7) erkek, 13'ü (%30,2) kadın 43 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların 30'unda (%69,7) ağrısız şişlik, 10'unda (%23,2) yemek sonrası ağrılı şişlik, üçünde ise (%6,9) sık enfeksiyon ve ağız içine akıntı şikayetleri mevcuttu. Histopatolojik olarak 39'u benign, dördü malign idi. Olgularda en sık rastlanan benign patoloji siyaloadenit idi. Cerrahinin kompikasyonları bir olguda kalıcı, üç olguda geçici olmak üzere dört olguda marjinal mandibular sinir hasarı ve iki olguda hematom görüldü.Sonuç: Submandibuler bez histopatolojik sonuçlarımızın yüzdelik dağılımının literatür ile uyumlu olduğunu gördük. Marjinal mandibuler sinir hasarı, submandibuler bez eksizyonunun en sık görülen komplikasyonlarından biri olsa da, bizim olgularımızda bir hastada kalıcı olarak gelişmiştir, dolayısıyla submandibular bez eksizyonu güvenilir bir operasyondur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AÇIKALIN, R. M., ÖZBAY, İ., VEYSELLER, B., DİKMEN, B., ACAR, G., ALP, A., TOPTAŞ, M. (2014). Submandibular Gland Excision: Analysis of 43 Cases. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 199–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/268310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Witt RL, Maygarden SJ. Benign tumors, cyst, and tumor-like condition of the salivary glands. İn: Witt R.L,editor. Salivary gland diseases. Surgical and medical management. New York. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2005;114. Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, İstanbul,
  2. Türkiye Stanley MW, Bardales RH, Beneke J, Korourian S, Stern SJ. Stanley MW, Bardales RH, Beneke J, Korourian S, Stern SJ. Sialolithiasis. Differential diagnostic problems in fine-needle aspiration cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:229-33.
  3. Leung AK, Choi MC, Wagner GA. Multiple sialoliths and a sialolith of unusual size in the submandibular duct: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:331-3. Siddiqui SJ. Sialolithiasis: an unusually large submandibular salivary stone. Br Dent J 2002;193:89-91.
  4. Work WP, Hecht DW. Inflammatory diseases of the major salivary glands In: Papparella MM, Shumrick DF, editors. Otolaryngology Philadelphia. WB Saunders; 1980; p. 2235- 43. Baurmash HD. Submandibular salivary stones: current management modalities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:369- 78. Paul D, Chauhan SR. Salivary megalith with a sialo-cutaneous and a sialo-oral fistula: a case report. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:767-9.
  5. Berçin S, Kutluhan A, Yurttaş V, Kanmaz A. Submandibuler sialolityazise yaklaşımımız. Yeni Tıp Dergisi 2009;26:16-9.
  6. Cohen EG, Patel SG, Lin O, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland lesions in a selected patient population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:773-8. Weissmann JL. Imaging of the salivary glands. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1995;16:546-68. Zbären P, Schär C, Hotz MA, Loosli H. Value of fine-needle aspiration cytology of parotid gland masses. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1989-92.
  7. Hughes JH, Volk EE, Wilbur DC; Cytopathology Resource Committee, College of American Pathologists. Hughes JH, Volk EE, Wilbur DC; Cytopathology Resource Committee, College of American Pathologists. Pitfalls in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cytology: lessons from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:26- 31. Postema RJ, van Velthuysen ML, van den Brekel MW, Balm AJ, PHaseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiyeeterse JL. Postema RJ, vanVelthuysen ML, van den Brekel MW, Balm AJ, Peterse JL. Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions in the Netherlands Cancer In