Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2012 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3

Effectiveness of selective Non-operative treatment in penetrating abdominal injuries

Penetran batın yaralanmalarında seçici Non-operatif tedavinin etkinliği

Pages
81–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: SNOT of penetrating abdominal injuries has a high success rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: As a result of improvements in resuscitation and surgical techniques, advances in antibiotic treatment and development of monitoring equipments, selective non-operative treatment (SNOT) has emerged as an important development in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: During the study period, hemodynamically stable 133 patients with penetrating injuries to the anterior and posterior abdomen and without indication for laparotomy were followed and treated with SNOT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: SNOT of penetrating abdominal injuries has a high success rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: As a result of improvements in resuscitation and surgical techniques, advances in antibiotic treatment and development of monitoring equipments, selective non-operative treatment (SNOT) has emerged as an important development in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries. If patients do not need the operation, the ability to treat them without surgical intervention is not only scientifically correct but also necessary in terms of ethics. Methods: During the study period, hemodynamically stable 133 patients with penetrating injuries to the anterior and posterior abdomen and without indication for laparotomy were followed and treated with SNOT. Results: There were 122 men and 11 women. The mean age was 28,9 years (range: 14-60 years). Based on clinical observation, laparotomy was performed in 16 patients (12%). The remaining patients were clinically monitored without any surgical intervention. Mortality and major complication rate was zero in all groups. Patients treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay (1.8 days) than patients treated operatively (5,2 days) (p=0.0003). In one case, we found no significant organ injury during surgery in the laparotomy group. Conclusion: SNOT of penetrating abdominal injuries has a high success rate.

Özet

Amaç: Resüsitasyon ve cerrahi tekniklerin iyileştirilmesi, antibiyotik tedavisindeki ilerlemeler ve monitörizasyon ekipmanlarının geliştirilmesi sonucu, penetran batın yaralanmalarında seçici nonoperatif tedavi (SNOT) yöntemleri önemli bir gelişme olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Operasyon gereksinimi olmayan hastaları, operasyonsuz olarak emniyetle ve güvenle tedavi edebilme becerisi yalnızca bilimsel açıdan değil etik açıdan da doğrudur. Yöntem: Çalışmanın yapıldığı süre içinde, anterior ve posteriordan batına penetran delici kesici yaralanması olan, ancak laparotomi için belirgin bir endikasyonu bulunmayan ve hemodinamik açıdan stabil hastalar bu çalışma için aday olarak seçildi. Bulgular: Hastaların, 122’si erkek, 11’i kadın olup, yaş ortalaması 29 (14-60) idi. Hastaların %12’sine (16 hasta) yapılan klinik takip sonucu laparotomi uygulanmış, geri kalanı operasyon uygulamaksızın takip edilmiştir. Tüm hasta grupları içinde mortalite ve major morbidite oranı sıfır idi. Hastaların ortalama hastanede kalış süresi tüm gruplar için 2,45 gün olup, nonoperatif grupta bu süre ortalama 1,8 gün, opere edilenlerde ise 5,2 gün bulundu (p=0.0003). Sonuç: Penetran batın yaralanmalarında dikkatle uygulanacak SNOT, hayli yüksek bir başarıya sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARŞIDAĞ, T., TÜZÜN, S. (2012). Effectiveness of selective Non-operative treatment in penetrating abdominal injuries. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3, 81–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/268253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. 1 Maynard A. Oropeza G. Mandatory operation for penetrating wounds of the abdomen Am J Surg 1968
  2. Forde KA Ganepola GA. Is mandatory exploration for penetrating abdominal trauma extinct? The morbidity and mortality of negative exploration in a large municipal hospital. J Trauma 1974
  3. Garland JB. Stab-wounds and other penetrating injuries of the abdomen and thorax. Postgrad Med J 1968
  4. Hopson WB. Sherman RT. Sanders JW. Stab wounds of the abdomen: a 5-year review of 297 cases. Am Surg 1966
  5. Wilson H, Sherman R. Civilian penetrating wounds of the abdomen. I. factors in mortality and differences from military wounds in 494 cases. Ann Surg 1961
  6. Aragon GE, Eiseman B. Abdominal stab wounds: evaluation of sinograpy. J Trauma 1976
  7. Cornell WP, Ebert PA, Greenfield LJ, Zuidema GD. A new nonoperative thecnique for the diagnosis of penetrating injuries to the abdomen. J Trauma 1967
  8. McAlvanah MJ. Shaftan GW. Selective conservatism in penetrating abdominal wounds: a continuing reappraisal. J Trauma 1978
  9. Moss LK, Schmidt FE, Creech O Jr. Analysis of 550 stab wounds of the abdomen. Am Surg 1962
  10. McNabney WK, McCause A. Management of stab wounds of the abdomen. Am J Surg 1968
  11. Nance FC, Cohn J. Surgical judgement in the management of stab wounds of the abdomen: A retrospective and prospective analysis based on a study of 600 stabbed patients. Ann Surg 1969
  12. Nance FC, Wennar MH, Johnson LW, Ingram JC Jr, Cohn I Jr. Surgical judgement in the management of penetrating wounds of the abdomen. Experience with 2212 patients. Ann Surg 1974
  13. Richter RM, Zaki MH. Selective conservative management of penetrating abdominal wounds. Ann Surg 1967
  14. Printen KJ, Freeark RJ, Shoemaker WC. Conservative management of penetrating abdominal wounds. Arch Surg 1968
  15. Cinel A, Çiçek R, Küçüktulu U ve ark. Künt ve penetran karın travmaları. Çağdaş Cerrahi Derg 2000
  16. Kaplan L. Abdominal Trauma, penetrating. eMedicine Journal 2001
  17. Rosemurgy AS 2nd, Albrink MH, Olson SM, et al. Abdominal stab wound protocol: prospective study documents applicability for widespread use. Am Surg 1995
  18. Shaftan GW. Indications for operation in abdominal trauma. Am J Surg 1960
  19. Komar AR. Abdominal Trauma, penetrating. Medicine Journal 2001
  20. Ivatury RR, Simon RJ, Stahl WM. A c