Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2010 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the effects of oral midazolam, ketamine and tramadol on postoperative agitation related to sevoflurane in children

Çocuklarda peroral midazolam, ketamin ve tramadolün, sevoflurana bağlı postoperatif ajitasyon üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
146–152
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the frequency of postoperative agitation-delirium is not different among these three agents. (The Medical Bulletin of Haseki 2010; 48: 146-52)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of oral midazolam, ketamine and tramadol, which have been administered as premedication in pediatric patients, on sedation quality, postoperative agitation and pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Sixty pediatric patients (aged 2-12 years) with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications I and II were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the frequency of postoperative agitation-delirium is not different among these three agents. (The Medical Bulletin of Haseki 2010; 48: 146-52)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of oral midazolam, ketamine and tramadol, which have been administered as premedication in pediatric patients, on sedation quality, postoperative agitation and pain. Methods: Sixty pediatric patients (aged 2-12 years) with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications I and II were included in the study. Group M was administered 0.5 mg kg-1 midazolam, Group K 6 mg kg-1 ketamine and Group T 2 mg kg-1 tramadol orally. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rates (HR), Ramsey sedation scores (Rss) and sedation agitation scores (Sas) were recorded before and at 10 and 30 min after drug administration, before induction and 5,10, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after operation in all patients. Anesthesia induction was performed with lidocaine, propofol and rocuronium. Maintenance of anaesthesia was provided with sevoflurane, N2O and O2. Recovery times, Alderete scores and facial pain scores (FPS) were recorded. Results: There were no differences between the groups according to demographic data. HR was significantly lower in Group T. Group M was determined to be more agitated 30 and 45 min after the operation. Also, Alderete scores were lower in Goup K. The FPS scores of Group T were lower (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to frequency of postoperative agitation and delirium. Conclusion: Although ketamine may reduce the postoperative sedation-agitation scores, it also may reduce the recovery scores in pediatric patients. Tramadol does not provide adequate sedation in premedication, but it reduces postoperative pain scores. However, the frequency of postoperative agitation-delirium is not different among these three agents. (The Medical Bulletin of Haseki 2010; 48: 146-52)

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, coçuk hastalara premedikasyon amacıyla verilen oral midazolam, ketamin ve tramadolün, sedasyon kalitesi, postoperatif ajitasyon ve ağrı üzerine etkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: 2-12 yaş arası, Amerikan Anestezistler Derneği (ASA) I-II risk grubunda, 60 olgu çalışmaya dahil edildi. Operasyondan 30 dk. önce; Grup M’ye (n=20) 0,5 mg kg-1 midazolam, Grup K’ya (n=20) 6 mg kg-1 ketamin ve Grup T’ye (n=20) 2 mg kg-1 tramadol damla; 0,4 ml kg-1 vişne suyu içinde, toplam 10 ml volümü geçmeyecek şekilde oral olarak verildi. Tüm hastalarda ortalama arteriyel kan basınçları (OAB), kalp atım hızı (KAH), Ramsey sedasyon skoru (Rss) ve Sedasyon ajitasyon skoru (Sas), ilaç öncesi ve ilaç sonrası 10 ve 30. dakikalarda, indüksiyon öncesi, operasyon sonrası 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, ve 90. dakikalarda kaydedildi. Anestezi indüksiyonu lidokain, propofol ve rokuronyum ile yapıldı. Anestezi idamesi sevofluran, N2O ve O2 ile sağlandı. Ekstübasyon zamanı, yeterli spontan solunum zamanı, Alderete skorları ve derlenme süresi kayıt edildi. Postoperatif ağrının değerlendirilmesinde, fasiyal ağrı skoru (FPS) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında demografik veriler açısından fark yoktu. KAH Grup T’de, anlamlı olarak düşük bulundu. Operasyon sonrası 30 ve 45. dakikalarda Grup M’nin daha ajite olduğu saptandı. Grup K’da Aldrete skorları daha düşüktü. Grup T’de FPS değeri daha düşüktü (p<0,05). Gruplar arasında postoperatif izlem sırasında ajitasyon sıklığı açısından fark bulunamadı. Sonuç: Ketamin pediatrik hastalarda postoperatif sedasyon ajitasyon skorlarını düşürebilmekle birlikte, derlenme skorlarını da düşürebilir. Tramadol premedikasyonunda yeterli sedasyon sağlamamakla birlikte postoperatif ağrı skorlarını düşürmektedir. Ancak her üç ajan arasında ajitasyon-deliryum sıklığı açısından fark bulunmamaktadır. (Haseki Tıp Bülteni 2010; 48: 146-52)

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAYAZILI, R., ÖZKOÇAK, I., AYOĞLU, H., YURTLU, S., OKYAY, R. D., HANCI, V. (2010). Comparison of the effects of oral midazolam, ketamine and tramadol on postoperative agitation related to sevoflurane in children. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4, 146–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/268031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Karl HW, Rosenberger JL, Larach MG, Ruffle JM. Transmucoral administration of midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients. Anesthesiology 1993
  2. [Abstract] / [PDF] 2. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, O'Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV. Preoperative anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996
  3. [Abstract] / [PDF] 3. Harput A, Özcengiz D, Özbek H, Ünlügenç H, Işık G. Çocuklarda halotan ile sevofluranın anestezi indüksiyonu ve uyanma üzerine etkilerinin karflılafltırılması. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuası 1999
  4. Kern C, Erb T, Frei FJ. Haemodynamic responses to sevoflurane compared with halothane during inhalational induction in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1997
  5. [Abstract] 5. Cole JW, Murray DJ, McAllister JD, Hirshberg GE. Emergence behavior in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2002
  6. [Abstract] / [Full Text] / [PDF] 6. Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttimann UE, Callan CM. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg 1996
  7. [Abstract] / [PDF] 7. Hancı V, Erbay H, Tomatır E, Atalay H, Tekelioğlu U. Çocuklarda preemptif farklı tramadol dozlarının postoperatif ağrıya etkisi. Haydarpafla Numune Eğitim ve Arafltırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi 2007
  8. Wilton NC, Leigh J, Rosen DR, Pandit UA. Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children using intranasal midazolam. Anesthesiology 1988
  9. [Abstract] / [PDF] 9. Malinovsky JM, Populaire C, Cozian A, Lepage JY, Lejus C, Pinaud M. Premedication with midazolam in children. Effect of intranasal, rectal and oral routes on plasma midazolam concentrations. Anaesthesia 1995
  10. [Abstract] 10. Karl HW, Keifer AT, Rosenberger JL, Larach MG, Ruffle JM. Comparison of safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam or sufentanil for preinduction of anesthesia in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology 1992
  11. [Abstract] / [PDF] 11. Breschan C, Platzer M, Jost R, Stettner H, Likar R. Midazolam does not reduce emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2007
  12. [Abstract] 12. Lapin SL, Auden SM, Goldsmith LJ, Reynolds AM. Effects of sevoflurane anaesthesia on recovery in children: a comparison with halothane. Paediatr Anaesth 1999
  13. [Abstract] / [Full Text] / [PDF] 13. Cohen IT, Drewsen S, Hannallah RS. Propofol or midazolam do