Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2014 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

Outcomes of Four Different Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Geriatrik Hastalardaki İntertrokanterik Femur Kırıklarının Tedavisinde Dört Farklı Operasyon Yönteminin Sonuçları

Pages
256–261
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In HA group, walking with double support duration was shorter (p=0.028).Conclusion: Elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures should be operated as soon as possible in order to prevent eventual complications preferably by regional anesthesia and internal fixation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the suicide and intoxication cases between April 2011 and April 2013.Methods: One hundred eighty-two patients operated due to intertrochanteric femur fracture in our clinic were divided into four groups: hemiarthroplasty (HA), proximal femoral nail (PFN), sliding hip screw (SHC), and external fixator (EF) groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Time to surgery, comorbidities, anesthesia techniques, postoperative ambulation time, mortality rates and daily activity levels were compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In HA group, walking with double support duration was shorter (p=0.028).Conclusion: Elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures should be operated as soon as possible in order to prevent eventual complications preferably by regional anesthesia and internal fixation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the suicide and intoxication cases between April 2011 and April 2013.Methods: One hundred eighty-two patients operated due to intertrochanteric femur fracture in our clinic were divided into four groups: hemiarthroplasty (HA), proximal femoral nail (PFN), sliding hip screw (SHC), and external fixator (EF) groups. Time to surgery, comorbidities, anesthesia techniques, postoperative ambulation time, mortality rates and daily activity levels were compared. The patients were evaluated via outpatient follow-up and telephone interview. The Barthel index of activities of daily living was used for evaluation. Results: Patient distribution was: HA: 17 patients, PFN: 26 patients, SHC: 71 patients, and EF: 68 patients. The gender distribution (F/M) and the mean age were: HA: 11/6, 83.4 years, PFN: 18/8, 81.2 years, SHC: 48/23, 82.1 years, and EF: 44/24, 84.5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in gender, comorbidities, anesthesia techniques, mean follow-up period, and Barthel index scores. In HA group, walking with double support duration was shorter (p=0.028).Conclusion: Elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures should be operated as soon as possible in order to prevent eventual complications preferably by regional anesthesia and internal fixation.

Özet

Amaç: Geriatrik intertrokanterik femur kırıklarında sıklıkla kullanılan dört farklı yöntemin fonksiyonel sonuçları ve sağ kalım oranları açısından karşılaştırılması.Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde intertrokanterik femur fraktürü nedeniyle tedavi edilmiş olan 182 hasta dört alt gruba (parsiyel kalça protezi (PKP), proksimal femur çivisi (PFÇ), kayıcı kalça çivisi (KKÇ) ve eksternal fiksatör (EF)) bölünerek ameliyat öncesi özellikler (bekleme süresi ve eşlik eden hastalıklar), anestezi tekniği, ameliyat sonrası harekete başlama zamanı, ölüm oranları ve günlük aktivite düzeyleri açılarından karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar poliklinik kontrolleri ve telefonla anket şeklinde değerlendirildi. Günlük aktivite değerlendirmesi Barthel aktivite indeksi kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Değerlendirmeye alınan 182 hastanın dağılımı; PKP: 17, PFÇ: 26, KKÇ: 71 ve EF: 68 şeklindeydi. Hastaların cinsiyet dağılımı (Kadın/Erkek) ve ortalama yaşları ise; PKP: 11/6, 83,4, PFÇ: 18/8, 81,2, KKÇ: 48/23, 82,1 ve EF: 44/24, 84,5 olarak bulundu. Grupların cinsiyet, eşlik eden hastalıklar, anestezi tekniği, ortalama takip süreleri ve Barthel skorları açısından yapılan karşılaştırmalarında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir sonuç elde edilmedi. PKP grubunun çift destekle yürüme süresinin daha kısa olduğu tespit edildi (p=0,028).Sonuç: Geriatrik hasta grubundaki intertrokanterik femur kırıkları olası komplikasyonların önüne geçebilmek için mümkün olan en kısa sürede ve tercihen bölgesel anestezi ve internal/eksternal tespit yöntemleriyle tedavi edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURAMAZ, A., SARI, C., BİLGİLİ, M. G., ERÇİN, E., KURAL, C., AVKAN, M. C. (2014). Outcomes of Four Different Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 256–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/267888

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:285-9
  2. Farahmand BY, Michaelsson K, Ahlbom A, Ljunghall S, Baron JA. Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group. Survival after hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int 2005;16:1583-90
  3. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Has mortality after a hip fracture increased? J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:1720-6
  4. Schürch MA, Rizzoli R, Mermillod B, et al. A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1935-42
  5. Kesmezacar H, Öğüt T, Bilgili MG, Gökay S, Tenekecioğlu Y. Yaşlılarda intertrokanterik femur kırıklarının tedavisi:İnternal tespit mi, hemiartroplasti mi? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2005;39:287-94
  6. Şen C, Akman Ş, Boynuk B, Aşık M, Tözün R. 70 yaş üzerindeki femur boyun kırıklı hastalarda düz saplı (straight stem) parsiyel protez uygulamalarımız. Ulusal Travma Dergisi 2000;6:160-5
  7. Atıcı T, Şahin N, Öztürk A, Yaray O. İleri yaşlı (>=65 yaş) yüksek riskli olgularda gelişen intertrokanterik femur kırıklarının eksternal fiksatörle tedavisi Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2010;16:413-20
  8. Kesmezacar H, Ayhan E, Unlu MC, Seker A, Karaca S. Predictors of Mortality in Elderly Patients With an Intertrochanteric or a Femoral Neck Fracture. J Trauma 2010;68:153-8
  9. Audigé L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF. Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 2003;27:197-203
  10. Masson M, Parker MJ, Fleischer S. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;2:CD001708. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD001708
  11. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, et al. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1673-81
  12. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-5
  13. Sexson SB, Lehner JR. Factors affecting hip fracture mortality. J Orthop Trauma 1987;1:298-305
  14. White BL, Fisher WD, Laurin CA. Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980's. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:1335-40
  15. Karagiannis A, Papakitsou E, Dretakis K, et al. Mortality rates of patients with a hip fracture in a southwestern district of Gre