SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Short-Term Results of Shoulder Instability Surgery

Omuz İnstabilite Cerrahisinin Kısa Dönem Sonuçları

Erhan BAYRAM
Ahmet Kamil ERTÜRK
Cem YILDIRIM
Doğan ATLIHAN
Mahmut Ercan ÇETİNUS
Murat YILMAZ
Pages
147–152
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cem Yıldırım, Doğan Atlıhan, Mahmut Ercan Çetinus*, Murat Yılmaz

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, we aimed to discuss the result of arthroscopic surgery for shoulder instability and we planned to show the value of instability tests for determining success of surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Patients, who were operated for shoulder instability between 2008 and 2013, were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cem Yıldırım, Doğan Atlıhan, Mahmut Ercan Çetinus*, Murat Yılmaz
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to discuss the result of arthroscopic surgery for shoulder instability and we planned to show the value of instability tests for determining success of surgery. Methods: Patients, who were operated for shoulder instability between 2008 and 2013, were included in this study. Visual analogue scale, Rowe and Oxford shoulder scores of the patients were recorded preoperatively and at the final follow-up visit. Physical examination finding were noted at the final follow-up visit. Results were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Twenty one patients were included in this study. Redislocation was detected in two patients. There was no re-dislocation in patients with an osseous Bankart lesion. All clinical scores improved in all patients, however those with a negative apprehension test had better clinical scores. Conclusion: Arthroscopic Bankart repair is an effective procedure for the treatment of shoulder instability. Presence of osseous Bankart lesion plays an important role in the prognosis. Apprehension test is useful for assessing shoulder stability in the postoperative follow-up. Cem Yıldırım, Doğan Atlıhan, Mahmut Ercan Çetinus*, Murat Yılmaz

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, omuz instabilitesi için artroskopik cerrahinin sonuçlarını tartışmayı amaçladık ve cerrahinin başarısını belirlemek için instabilite testlerinin değerini göstermeyi planladık. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya 2008-2013 yılları arasında omuz instabilitesi nedeniyle opere edilen hastalar dahil edildi. Visual analog skala, Rowe ve Oxford skorları preoperatif ve son takipte kaydedildi. Son muayenedeki fizik muayene bulguları kaydedildi. Sonuçlar SPSS ile analiz edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 21 hasta dahil edildi. İki hastada redislokasyon görüldü. Kemik Bankart lezyonu bulunmayan hastalarda redislokasyon gözlenmedi. Tüm klinik skorlar anlamlı derecede iyileşti. Korkutma testi negatif olanlarda klinik skorlar daha iyi idi. Sonuç: Artroskopik Bankart onarımı, omuz instabilitesinin tedavisinde etkili bir yöntemdir. Osseöz Bankart lezyonun varlığı cerrahi prognoz için çok önemli bir faktördür. Korkutma testi postoperatif takiplerde kullanışlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAM, E., ERTÜRK, A. K., YILDIRIM, C., ATLIHAN, D., ÇETİNUS, M. E., YILMAZ, M. (2018). Short-Term Results of Shoulder Instability Surgery. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 147–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/267802

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Schrumpf MA, Maak TG, Delos D, et al. The management of anterior glenohumeral instability with and without bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:e12. Romeo AA, Cohen BS, Carreira DS. Traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Orthop Clin North Am 2001;32:399-409.
  2. Smith GC, Chesser TJ, Packham IN, Crowther MA. First time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a review of current management. Injury 2013;44:406-8.
  3. Arciero RA, Wheeler JH, Ryan JB, McBride JT. Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus nonoperative treatment for acute, initial anterior shoulder dislocations. Am J Sports Med 1994;22:589- 94. Jakobsen BW, Johannsen HV, Suder P. Primary repair versus conservative treatment of first-time traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder: A randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2007;23:118-23.
  4. Rowe CR, Patel D, Southmayd WW. The Bankart procedure: a long term end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:1- 16. Akpinar S, Demirhan M, Kilicoglu O. Modification of Bankart reconstruction with lateral capsulotomy and selective anatomic repair using suture anchors. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2000;59:88-93.
  5. Petrera M, Patella V, Patella S, Theodoropoulos J. A metaanalysis of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:1742-7.
  6. Maynou C, Cassagnaud X, Mestdagh H. Function of subscapularis after surgical treatment for recurrent instability of the shoulder using a bone-block procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1096-101.
  7. Sachs RA, Williams B, Stone ML, Paxton L, Kuney M. Open Bankart repair: correlation of results with postoperative subscapularis function. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:1458-62.
  8. Rhee YG, Lim CT, Cho NS. Muscle Strength After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Arthroscopic Versus Open Bankart Repair 2007;11:1859-64.
  9. Kim SH, Ha KI. Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: open versus arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopy 2002;18:755-63.
  10. Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, Fadda S, Ziranu F, Mulas PD. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 2004;20:456-62.
  11. Bottoni CR, Smith EL, Berkowitz MJ, Towle RB, Moore JH. Arthroscopic versus open shoulder stabilization for recurrent anterior instability: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1730-7.
  12. Hobby J, Griffin D, Dunbar M, Boileau P. Is arthroscopic surgery for stabilization of chronic shoulder instability as effective as open surger